Scalar implicatures: working memory and a comparison with `only'.
A Scalar Implicature (SI) arises when the use of a weaker expression (e.g., some politicians are corrupt) implies the denial of an alternative sentence (e.g., not all politicians are corrupt). The cognitive effort associated with the processing of SIs involves central memory resources (De Neys &...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013-07-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00403/full |
| _version_ | 1818291769332203520 |
|---|---|
| author | Paul Pierre Marty Emmanuel eChemla |
| author_facet | Paul Pierre Marty Emmanuel eChemla |
| author_sort | Paul Pierre Marty |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | A Scalar Implicature (SI) arises when the use of a weaker expression (e.g., some politicians are corrupt) implies the denial of an alternative sentence (e.g., not all politicians are corrupt). The cognitive effort associated with the processing of SIs involves central memory resources (De Neys & Schaeken 2007, Dieussaert et al. 2011, Marty et al. 2013). The goal of this study is to locate this previous result within the current psycholinguistic debate, and to understand at which level of SI processing these resources are specifically involved. Using a dual-task approach, we show that (i) tapping participant's memory resources interferes with the derivation of SIs, whereas (ii) it does not affect the interpretation of sentences with `only' involving similar mechanisms (e.g., only some politicians are corrupt). We explain how these findings suggest that the central memory resources are not involved in the core process at the source of SIs, and discuss how this new difference between SIs and `only' bears on recent linguistic debates on the division of labour between grammar and pragmatics. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T02:49:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-99945d43f71b4eb286de3e4d71f70ee5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1664-1078 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T02:49:20Z |
| publishDate | 2013-07-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Psychology |
| spelling | doaj.art-99945d43f71b4eb286de3e4d71f70ee52022-12-22T00:02:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782013-07-01410.3389/fpsyg.2013.0040351438Scalar implicatures: working memory and a comparison with `only'.Paul Pierre Marty0Emmanuel eChemla1Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyEcole Normale SupérieureA Scalar Implicature (SI) arises when the use of a weaker expression (e.g., some politicians are corrupt) implies the denial of an alternative sentence (e.g., not all politicians are corrupt). The cognitive effort associated with the processing of SIs involves central memory resources (De Neys & Schaeken 2007, Dieussaert et al. 2011, Marty et al. 2013). The goal of this study is to locate this previous result within the current psycholinguistic debate, and to understand at which level of SI processing these resources are specifically involved. Using a dual-task approach, we show that (i) tapping participant's memory resources interferes with the derivation of SIs, whereas (ii) it does not affect the interpretation of sentences with `only' involving similar mechanisms (e.g., only some politicians are corrupt). We explain how these findings suggest that the central memory resources are not involved in the core process at the source of SIs, and discuss how this new difference between SIs and `only' bears on recent linguistic debates on the division of labour between grammar and pragmatics.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00403/fullworking memorypragmaticsgrammarscalar implicatureslanguage processing. |
| spellingShingle | Paul Pierre Marty Emmanuel eChemla Scalar implicatures: working memory and a comparison with `only'. Frontiers in Psychology working memory pragmatics grammar scalar implicatures language processing. |
| title | Scalar implicatures: working memory and a comparison with `only'. |
| title_full | Scalar implicatures: working memory and a comparison with `only'. |
| title_fullStr | Scalar implicatures: working memory and a comparison with `only'. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Scalar implicatures: working memory and a comparison with `only'. |
| title_short | Scalar implicatures: working memory and a comparison with `only'. |
| title_sort | scalar implicatures working memory and a comparison with only 39 |
| topic | working memory pragmatics grammar scalar implicatures language processing. |
| url | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00403/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT paulpierremarty scalarimplicaturesworkingmemoryandacomparisonwithonly39 AT emmanuelechemla scalarimplicaturesworkingmemoryandacomparisonwithonly39 |