The prevalence and impact of lysogeny among oral isolates of Enterococcus faecalis

Bacterial phenotypic properties are frequently influenced by the uptake of extrachromosomal genetic elements, such as plasmids and bacteriophage genomes. Such modifications can result in enhanced pathogenicity due to toxin production, increased toxin release, altered antigenicity, and resistance to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roy H. Stevens, Hongming Zhang, Christine Sedgley, Adam Bergman, Anil Reddy Manda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Oral Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2019.1643207
_version_ 1819052220761505792
author Roy H. Stevens
Hongming Zhang
Christine Sedgley
Adam Bergman
Anil Reddy Manda
author_facet Roy H. Stevens
Hongming Zhang
Christine Sedgley
Adam Bergman
Anil Reddy Manda
author_sort Roy H. Stevens
collection DOAJ
description Bacterial phenotypic properties are frequently influenced by the uptake of extrachromosomal genetic elements, such as plasmids and bacteriophage genomes. Such modifications can result in enhanced pathogenicity due to toxin production, increased toxin release, altered antigenicity, and resistance to antibiotics. In the case of bacteriophages, the phage genome can stably integrate into the bacterial chromosome as a prophage, to produce a lysogenic cell. Oral enterococcal strains have been isolated from subgingival plaque and the root canals of endodontically-treated teeth that have failed to heal. Previously, we isolated a bacteriophage, phage ɸEf11, induced from a lysogenic Enterococcus faecalis strain recovered from the root canal of a failed endodontic case. PCR analysis using phage ɸEf11-specific oligonucleotide primers, disclosed that lysogens containing ɸEf11 prophages were commonly found among oral E. faecalis strains, being detected in 19 of 61 (31%) strains examined. Furthermore, in comparison to an isogenic cured strain, cultures of a lysogen harboring an ɸEf11 prophage exhibited altered phenotypic characteristics, such as increased persistence at high density, enhanced biofilm formation, and resistance to a bacteriophage lytic enzyme. From these results we conclude that lysogeny is common among oral E. faecalis strains, and that it alters properties of the lysogenic cell.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T12:16:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-99a37b99974840bfaab2d7cbc103cc23
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2000-2297
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T12:16:23Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Oral Microbiology
spelling doaj.art-99a37b99974840bfaab2d7cbc103cc232022-12-21T19:04:26ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Oral Microbiology2000-22972019-01-0111110.1080/20002297.2019.16432071643207The prevalence and impact of lysogeny among oral isolates of Enterococcus faecalisRoy H. Stevens0Hongming Zhang1Christine Sedgley2Adam Bergman3Anil Reddy Manda4Temple UniversityTemple UniversityOregon Health and Science UniversityTemple UniversityTemple UniversityBacterial phenotypic properties are frequently influenced by the uptake of extrachromosomal genetic elements, such as plasmids and bacteriophage genomes. Such modifications can result in enhanced pathogenicity due to toxin production, increased toxin release, altered antigenicity, and resistance to antibiotics. In the case of bacteriophages, the phage genome can stably integrate into the bacterial chromosome as a prophage, to produce a lysogenic cell. Oral enterococcal strains have been isolated from subgingival plaque and the root canals of endodontically-treated teeth that have failed to heal. Previously, we isolated a bacteriophage, phage ɸEf11, induced from a lysogenic Enterococcus faecalis strain recovered from the root canal of a failed endodontic case. PCR analysis using phage ɸEf11-specific oligonucleotide primers, disclosed that lysogens containing ɸEf11 prophages were commonly found among oral E. faecalis strains, being detected in 19 of 61 (31%) strains examined. Furthermore, in comparison to an isogenic cured strain, cultures of a lysogen harboring an ɸEf11 prophage exhibited altered phenotypic characteristics, such as increased persistence at high density, enhanced biofilm formation, and resistance to a bacteriophage lytic enzyme. From these results we conclude that lysogeny is common among oral E. faecalis strains, and that it alters properties of the lysogenic cell.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2019.1643207enterococcus faecalisbacteriophageprophagelysogenyphage φef11
spellingShingle Roy H. Stevens
Hongming Zhang
Christine Sedgley
Adam Bergman
Anil Reddy Manda
The prevalence and impact of lysogeny among oral isolates of Enterococcus faecalis
Journal of Oral Microbiology
enterococcus faecalis
bacteriophage
prophage
lysogeny
phage φef11
title The prevalence and impact of lysogeny among oral isolates of Enterococcus faecalis
title_full The prevalence and impact of lysogeny among oral isolates of Enterococcus faecalis
title_fullStr The prevalence and impact of lysogeny among oral isolates of Enterococcus faecalis
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence and impact of lysogeny among oral isolates of Enterococcus faecalis
title_short The prevalence and impact of lysogeny among oral isolates of Enterococcus faecalis
title_sort prevalence and impact of lysogeny among oral isolates of enterococcus faecalis
topic enterococcus faecalis
bacteriophage
prophage
lysogeny
phage φef11
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2019.1643207
work_keys_str_mv AT royhstevens theprevalenceandimpactoflysogenyamongoralisolatesofenterococcusfaecalis
AT hongmingzhang theprevalenceandimpactoflysogenyamongoralisolatesofenterococcusfaecalis
AT christinesedgley theprevalenceandimpactoflysogenyamongoralisolatesofenterococcusfaecalis
AT adambergman theprevalenceandimpactoflysogenyamongoralisolatesofenterococcusfaecalis
AT anilreddymanda theprevalenceandimpactoflysogenyamongoralisolatesofenterococcusfaecalis
AT royhstevens prevalenceandimpactoflysogenyamongoralisolatesofenterococcusfaecalis
AT hongmingzhang prevalenceandimpactoflysogenyamongoralisolatesofenterococcusfaecalis
AT christinesedgley prevalenceandimpactoflysogenyamongoralisolatesofenterococcusfaecalis
AT adambergman prevalenceandimpactoflysogenyamongoralisolatesofenterococcusfaecalis
AT anilreddymanda prevalenceandimpactoflysogenyamongoralisolatesofenterococcusfaecalis