Non-Neuraxial Chest and Abdominal Wall Regional Anesthesia for Intensive Care Physicians—A Narrative Review

Multi-modal analgesic strategies, including regional anesthesia techniques, have been shown to contribute to a reduction in the use of opioids and associated side effects in the perioperative setting. Consequently, those so-called multi-modal approaches are recommended and have become the state of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sascha Ott, Lukas M. Müller-Wirtz, Gokhan Sertcakacilar, Yasin Tire, Alparslan Turan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-02-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/4/1104
_version_ 1797297881708756992
author Sascha Ott
Lukas M. Müller-Wirtz
Gokhan Sertcakacilar
Yasin Tire
Alparslan Turan
author_facet Sascha Ott
Lukas M. Müller-Wirtz
Gokhan Sertcakacilar
Yasin Tire
Alparslan Turan
author_sort Sascha Ott
collection DOAJ
description Multi-modal analgesic strategies, including regional anesthesia techniques, have been shown to contribute to a reduction in the use of opioids and associated side effects in the perioperative setting. Consequently, those so-called multi-modal approaches are recommended and have become the state of the art in perioperative medicine. In the majority of intensive care units (ICUs), however, mono-modal opioid-based analgesic strategies are still the standard of care. The evidence guiding the application of regional anesthesia in the ICU is scarce because possible complications, especially associated with neuraxial regional anesthesia techniques, are often feared in critically ill patients. However, chest and abdominal wall analgesia in particular is often insufficiently treated by opioid-based analgesic regimes. This review summarizes the available evidence and gives recommendations for peripheral regional analgesia approaches as valuable complements in the repertoire of intensive care physicians’ analgesic portfolios.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:26:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-99a5b2e522ff4320a4a134f782390a72
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:26:51Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-99a5b2e522ff4320a4a134f782390a722024-02-23T15:22:18ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832024-02-01134110410.3390/jcm13041104Non-Neuraxial Chest and Abdominal Wall Regional Anesthesia for Intensive Care Physicians—A Narrative ReviewSascha Ott0Lukas M. Müller-Wirtz1Gokhan Sertcakacilar2Yasin Tire3Alparslan Turan4Department of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USADepartment of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USADepartment of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USADepartment of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USADepartment of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USAMulti-modal analgesic strategies, including regional anesthesia techniques, have been shown to contribute to a reduction in the use of opioids and associated side effects in the perioperative setting. Consequently, those so-called multi-modal approaches are recommended and have become the state of the art in perioperative medicine. In the majority of intensive care units (ICUs), however, mono-modal opioid-based analgesic strategies are still the standard of care. The evidence guiding the application of regional anesthesia in the ICU is scarce because possible complications, especially associated with neuraxial regional anesthesia techniques, are often feared in critically ill patients. However, chest and abdominal wall analgesia in particular is often insufficiently treated by opioid-based analgesic regimes. This review summarizes the available evidence and gives recommendations for peripheral regional analgesia approaches as valuable complements in the repertoire of intensive care physicians’ analgesic portfolios.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/4/1104regional anesthesiaperipheral nerve blockschest wall blocksabdominal wall blocksairway blocksICU
spellingShingle Sascha Ott
Lukas M. Müller-Wirtz
Gokhan Sertcakacilar
Yasin Tire
Alparslan Turan
Non-Neuraxial Chest and Abdominal Wall Regional Anesthesia for Intensive Care Physicians—A Narrative Review
Journal of Clinical Medicine
regional anesthesia
peripheral nerve blocks
chest wall blocks
abdominal wall blocks
airway blocks
ICU
title Non-Neuraxial Chest and Abdominal Wall Regional Anesthesia for Intensive Care Physicians—A Narrative Review
title_full Non-Neuraxial Chest and Abdominal Wall Regional Anesthesia for Intensive Care Physicians—A Narrative Review
title_fullStr Non-Neuraxial Chest and Abdominal Wall Regional Anesthesia for Intensive Care Physicians—A Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Non-Neuraxial Chest and Abdominal Wall Regional Anesthesia for Intensive Care Physicians—A Narrative Review
title_short Non-Neuraxial Chest and Abdominal Wall Regional Anesthesia for Intensive Care Physicians—A Narrative Review
title_sort non neuraxial chest and abdominal wall regional anesthesia for intensive care physicians a narrative review
topic regional anesthesia
peripheral nerve blocks
chest wall blocks
abdominal wall blocks
airway blocks
ICU
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/4/1104
work_keys_str_mv AT saschaott nonneuraxialchestandabdominalwallregionalanesthesiaforintensivecarephysiciansanarrativereview
AT lukasmmullerwirtz nonneuraxialchestandabdominalwallregionalanesthesiaforintensivecarephysiciansanarrativereview
AT gokhansertcakacilar nonneuraxialchestandabdominalwallregionalanesthesiaforintensivecarephysiciansanarrativereview
AT yasintire nonneuraxialchestandabdominalwallregionalanesthesiaforintensivecarephysiciansanarrativereview
AT alparslanturan nonneuraxialchestandabdominalwallregionalanesthesiaforintensivecarephysiciansanarrativereview