Transcender les différends : une réaction possible aux situations de désaccord profond
Deep disagreement is a situation in which a conflict is so fundamental that there appears to be no underlying shared agreement by the arguers at any level. It is generally held that in such a case productive argument is not possible. Any claim the one party makes can be challenged by the other party...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
University of Tel-Aviv
2012-04-01
|
| Series: | Argumentation et Analyse du Discours |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/aad/1251 |
| _version_ | 1818535204887724032 |
|---|---|
| author | David Zarefsky |
| author_facet | David Zarefsky |
| author_sort | David Zarefsky |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Deep disagreement is a situation in which a conflict is so fundamental that there appears to be no underlying shared agreement by the arguers at any level. It is generally held that in such a case productive argument is not possible. Any claim the one party makes can be challenged by the other party in a potentially infinite regress, because there is no moment at which the interlocutor, by virtue of his or her prior commitments, is obligated to accept any standpoint. Overcoming deep disagreement requires transcending the impasse in the argument, seeing the controversy in a different light. This essay identifies four pairs of strategies that involve rhetorical moves to reset the disagreement and reshape the argument. In addition, two case studies are presented to illustrate these strategies, one a case of successful transcendence and the other a case of failure. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T18:21:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-99b07aca84214e60961a88c0160230da |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1565-8961 |
| language | fra |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T18:21:43Z |
| publishDate | 2012-04-01 |
| publisher | University of Tel-Aviv |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Argumentation et Analyse du Discours |
| spelling | doaj.art-99b07aca84214e60961a88c0160230da2022-12-22T00:55:14ZfraUniversity of Tel-AvivArgumentation et Analyse du Discours1565-89612012-04-01810.4000/aad.1251Transcender les différends : une réaction possible aux situations de désaccord profondDavid ZarefskyDeep disagreement is a situation in which a conflict is so fundamental that there appears to be no underlying shared agreement by the arguers at any level. It is generally held that in such a case productive argument is not possible. Any claim the one party makes can be challenged by the other party in a potentially infinite regress, because there is no moment at which the interlocutor, by virtue of his or her prior commitments, is obligated to accept any standpoint. Overcoming deep disagreement requires transcending the impasse in the argument, seeing the controversy in a different light. This essay identifies four pairs of strategies that involve rhetorical moves to reset the disagreement and reshape the argument. In addition, two case studies are presented to illustrate these strategies, one a case of successful transcendence and the other a case of failure.http://journals.openedition.org/aad/1251abortion controversycircumstantial ad hominemdeep disagreementframingpolarizationtranscendent argument |
| spellingShingle | David Zarefsky Transcender les différends : une réaction possible aux situations de désaccord profond Argumentation et Analyse du Discours abortion controversy circumstantial ad hominem deep disagreement framing polarization transcendent argument |
| title | Transcender les différends : une réaction possible aux situations de désaccord profond |
| title_full | Transcender les différends : une réaction possible aux situations de désaccord profond |
| title_fullStr | Transcender les différends : une réaction possible aux situations de désaccord profond |
| title_full_unstemmed | Transcender les différends : une réaction possible aux situations de désaccord profond |
| title_short | Transcender les différends : une réaction possible aux situations de désaccord profond |
| title_sort | transcender les differends une reaction possible aux situations de desaccord profond |
| topic | abortion controversy circumstantial ad hominem deep disagreement framing polarization transcendent argument |
| url | http://journals.openedition.org/aad/1251 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT davidzarefsky transcenderlesdifferendsunereactionpossibleauxsituationsdedesaccordprofond |