Impact of using chirp spread spectrum physical layer and request‐to‐send/clear‐to‐send combined with frame concatenation in the IEEE 802.15.4 non‐beacon enabled mode performance
Abstract This paper studies the performance improvement of the IEEE 802.15.4 non‐beacon‐enabled mode originated by the inclusion of the Request‐To‐Send/Clear‐To‐Send (RTS/CTS) handshake mechanism resulting in frame concatenation. Under IEEE 802.15.4 employing RTS/CTS, the backoff procedure is not re...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-02-01
|
| Series: | IET Wireless Sensor Systems |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1049/wss2.12045 |
| _version_ | 1828014758238879744 |
|---|---|
| author | Norberto Barroca Luís M. Borges Periklis Chatzimisios Fernando J. Velez |
| author_facet | Norberto Barroca Luís M. Borges Periklis Chatzimisios Fernando J. Velez |
| author_sort | Norberto Barroca |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract This paper studies the performance improvement of the IEEE 802.15.4 non‐beacon‐enabled mode originated by the inclusion of the Request‐To‐Send/Clear‐To‐Send (RTS/CTS) handshake mechanism resulting in frame concatenation. Under IEEE 802.15.4 employing RTS/CTS, the backoff procedure is not repeated for each data frame sent but only for each RTS/CTS set. The maximum throughput and minimum delay performance are mathematically derived for both the Chirp Spread Spectrum and Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum Physical layers for the 2.4 GHz band. Results show that the utilisation of RTS/CTS significantly enhances the performance of IEEE 802.15.4 applied to healthcare in terms of bandwidth efficiency. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T10:05:54Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-99c5e05c904745af8fe5eb21493c1a84 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2043-6386 2043-6394 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T10:05:54Z |
| publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | IET Wireless Sensor Systems |
| spelling | doaj.art-99c5e05c904745af8fe5eb21493c1a842023-02-15T17:50:28ZengWileyIET Wireless Sensor Systems2043-63862043-63942023-02-011311810.1049/wss2.12045Impact of using chirp spread spectrum physical layer and request‐to‐send/clear‐to‐send combined with frame concatenation in the IEEE 802.15.4 non‐beacon enabled mode performanceNorberto Barroca0Luís M. Borges1Periklis Chatzimisios2Fernando J. Velez3Instituto de Telecomunicações and Departamento de Engenharia Eletromecânica Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade da Beira Interior Covilhã PortugalInstituto de Telecomunicações and Departamento de Engenharia Eletromecânica Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade da Beira Interior Covilhã PortugalDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico USAInstituto de Telecomunicações and Departamento de Engenharia Eletromecânica Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade da Beira Interior Covilhã PortugalAbstract This paper studies the performance improvement of the IEEE 802.15.4 non‐beacon‐enabled mode originated by the inclusion of the Request‐To‐Send/Clear‐To‐Send (RTS/CTS) handshake mechanism resulting in frame concatenation. Under IEEE 802.15.4 employing RTS/CTS, the backoff procedure is not repeated for each data frame sent but only for each RTS/CTS set. The maximum throughput and minimum delay performance are mathematically derived for both the Chirp Spread Spectrum and Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum Physical layers for the 2.4 GHz band. Results show that the utilisation of RTS/CTS significantly enhances the performance of IEEE 802.15.4 applied to healthcare in terms of bandwidth efficiency.https://doi.org/10.1049/wss2.12045 |
| spellingShingle | Norberto Barroca Luís M. Borges Periklis Chatzimisios Fernando J. Velez Impact of using chirp spread spectrum physical layer and request‐to‐send/clear‐to‐send combined with frame concatenation in the IEEE 802.15.4 non‐beacon enabled mode performance IET Wireless Sensor Systems |
| title | Impact of using chirp spread spectrum physical layer and request‐to‐send/clear‐to‐send combined with frame concatenation in the IEEE 802.15.4 non‐beacon enabled mode performance |
| title_full | Impact of using chirp spread spectrum physical layer and request‐to‐send/clear‐to‐send combined with frame concatenation in the IEEE 802.15.4 non‐beacon enabled mode performance |
| title_fullStr | Impact of using chirp spread spectrum physical layer and request‐to‐send/clear‐to‐send combined with frame concatenation in the IEEE 802.15.4 non‐beacon enabled mode performance |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impact of using chirp spread spectrum physical layer and request‐to‐send/clear‐to‐send combined with frame concatenation in the IEEE 802.15.4 non‐beacon enabled mode performance |
| title_short | Impact of using chirp spread spectrum physical layer and request‐to‐send/clear‐to‐send combined with frame concatenation in the IEEE 802.15.4 non‐beacon enabled mode performance |
| title_sort | impact of using chirp spread spectrum physical layer and request to send clear to send combined with frame concatenation in the ieee 802 15 4 non beacon enabled mode performance |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1049/wss2.12045 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT norbertobarroca impactofusingchirpspreadspectrumphysicallayerandrequesttosendcleartosendcombinedwithframeconcatenationintheieee802154nonbeaconenabledmodeperformance AT luismborges impactofusingchirpspreadspectrumphysicallayerandrequesttosendcleartosendcombinedwithframeconcatenationintheieee802154nonbeaconenabledmodeperformance AT periklischatzimisios impactofusingchirpspreadspectrumphysicallayerandrequesttosendcleartosendcombinedwithframeconcatenationintheieee802154nonbeaconenabledmodeperformance AT fernandojvelez impactofusingchirpspreadspectrumphysicallayerandrequesttosendcleartosendcombinedwithframeconcatenationintheieee802154nonbeaconenabledmodeperformance |