Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot

Objective Evaluate the diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical test (FIT), identify risk factors for FIT-interval colorectal cancers (FIT-IC) and describe long-term outcomes of participants with colorectal cancers (CRC) in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot (BSP).Design From 2012 to 2017,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul Frankish, Ian Bissett, Susan Parry, Kai Sheng Saw, Kerry Sexton, Mike Hulme-Moir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2023-11-01
Series:BMJ Open Gastroenterology
Online Access:https://bmjopengastro.bmj.com/content/10/1/e001233.full
_version_ 1797371507887833088
author Paul Frankish
Ian Bissett
Susan Parry
Kai Sheng Saw
Kerry Sexton
Mike Hulme-Moir
author_facet Paul Frankish
Ian Bissett
Susan Parry
Kai Sheng Saw
Kerry Sexton
Mike Hulme-Moir
author_sort Paul Frankish
collection DOAJ
description Objective Evaluate the diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical test (FIT), identify risk factors for FIT-interval colorectal cancers (FIT-IC) and describe long-term outcomes of participants with colorectal cancers (CRC) in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot (BSP).Design From 2012 to 2017, the BSP offered eligible individuals, aged 50–74 years, biennial screening using a quantitative FIT with positivity threshold of 15 µg haemoglobin (Hb)/g faeces. Retrospective review of prospectively maintained data extracted from the BSP Register and New Zealand Cancer Registry identified any CRC reported in participants who returned a definitive FIT result. Further details were obtained from hospital records. FIT-ICs were primary CRC diagnosed within 24 months of a negative FIT. Factors associated with FIT-ICs were identified using logistic regression.Results Of 387 215 individuals invited, 57.4% participated with 6.1% returning positive FIT results. Final analysis included 520 CRC, of which 111 (21.3%) met FIT-IC definition. Overall FIT sensitivity for CRC was 78.7% (95% CI=74.9% to 82.1%), specificity was 94.1% (95% CI=94.0% to 94.2%). In 78 (70.3%) participants with FIT-IC, faecal Hb was reported as undetectable. There were no significant associations between FIT-IC and age, sex, ethnicity and deprivation. FIT-ICs were significantly associated with proximal tumour location, late stage at diagnosis, high-grade tumour differentiation and subsequent round screens. Median follow-up time was 74 (2–124) months. FIT-IC had significantly poorer overall survival.Conclusion FIT sensitivity in BSP compared favourably to published data. FIT-ICs were more likely to be proximal tumours with poor long-term outcomes. Further lowering of FIT threshold would have minimal impact on FIT-IC.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T18:21:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-99dfa56f517d40479eeda073d80a956c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2054-4774
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T18:21:07Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open Gastroenterology
spelling doaj.art-99dfa56f517d40479eeda073d80a956c2023-12-30T21:55:07ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Gastroenterology2054-47742023-11-0110110.1136/bmjgast-2023-001233Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in the New Zealand Bowel Screening PilotPaul Frankish0Ian Bissett1Susan Parry2Kai Sheng Saw3Kerry Sexton4Mike Hulme-Moir5Department of Gastroenterology, Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand Waitemata, Takapuna, New ZealandDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandNational Screening Unit, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Wellington, New ZealandDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandNational Screening Unit, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Wellington, New ZealandDepartment of Surgery, Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand Waitemata, Takapuna, New ZealandObjective Evaluate the diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical test (FIT), identify risk factors for FIT-interval colorectal cancers (FIT-IC) and describe long-term outcomes of participants with colorectal cancers (CRC) in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot (BSP).Design From 2012 to 2017, the BSP offered eligible individuals, aged 50–74 years, biennial screening using a quantitative FIT with positivity threshold of 15 µg haemoglobin (Hb)/g faeces. Retrospective review of prospectively maintained data extracted from the BSP Register and New Zealand Cancer Registry identified any CRC reported in participants who returned a definitive FIT result. Further details were obtained from hospital records. FIT-ICs were primary CRC diagnosed within 24 months of a negative FIT. Factors associated with FIT-ICs were identified using logistic regression.Results Of 387 215 individuals invited, 57.4% participated with 6.1% returning positive FIT results. Final analysis included 520 CRC, of which 111 (21.3%) met FIT-IC definition. Overall FIT sensitivity for CRC was 78.7% (95% CI=74.9% to 82.1%), specificity was 94.1% (95% CI=94.0% to 94.2%). In 78 (70.3%) participants with FIT-IC, faecal Hb was reported as undetectable. There were no significant associations between FIT-IC and age, sex, ethnicity and deprivation. FIT-ICs were significantly associated with proximal tumour location, late stage at diagnosis, high-grade tumour differentiation and subsequent round screens. Median follow-up time was 74 (2–124) months. FIT-IC had significantly poorer overall survival.Conclusion FIT sensitivity in BSP compared favourably to published data. FIT-ICs were more likely to be proximal tumours with poor long-term outcomes. Further lowering of FIT threshold would have minimal impact on FIT-IC.https://bmjopengastro.bmj.com/content/10/1/e001233.full
spellingShingle Paul Frankish
Ian Bissett
Susan Parry
Kai Sheng Saw
Kerry Sexton
Mike Hulme-Moir
Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
title Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot
title_full Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot
title_fullStr Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot
title_full_unstemmed Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot
title_short Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot
title_sort interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in the new zealand bowel screening pilot
url https://bmjopengastro.bmj.com/content/10/1/e001233.full
work_keys_str_mv AT paulfrankish intervalcolorectalcancersafternegativefaecalimmunochemicaltestinthenewzealandbowelscreeningpilot
AT ianbissett intervalcolorectalcancersafternegativefaecalimmunochemicaltestinthenewzealandbowelscreeningpilot
AT susanparry intervalcolorectalcancersafternegativefaecalimmunochemicaltestinthenewzealandbowelscreeningpilot
AT kaishengsaw intervalcolorectalcancersafternegativefaecalimmunochemicaltestinthenewzealandbowelscreeningpilot
AT kerrysexton intervalcolorectalcancersafternegativefaecalimmunochemicaltestinthenewzealandbowelscreeningpilot
AT mikehulmemoir intervalcolorectalcancersafternegativefaecalimmunochemicaltestinthenewzealandbowelscreeningpilot