Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in Cattle

Cattle are susceptible to heat stress, especially those kept on high levels of nutrition for the purpose of maximising growth rates, which leads to a significant heat increment in their bodies. Consequences include compromised health and productivity and mortalities during extreme events, as well as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Musadiq Idris, Jashim Uddin, Megan Sullivan, David M. McNeill, Clive J. C. Phillips
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/1/71
_version_ 1797542545871339520
author Musadiq Idris
Jashim Uddin
Megan Sullivan
David M. McNeill
Clive J. C. Phillips
author_facet Musadiq Idris
Jashim Uddin
Megan Sullivan
David M. McNeill
Clive J. C. Phillips
author_sort Musadiq Idris
collection DOAJ
description Cattle are susceptible to heat stress, especially those kept on high levels of nutrition for the purpose of maximising growth rates, which leads to a significant heat increment in their bodies. Consequences include compromised health and productivity and mortalities during extreme events, as well as serious economic loss. Some measures of heat stress, such as plasma cortisol and temperature in the rectum, vagina, or rumen, are invasive and therefore unlikely to be used on farms. These may cause additional stress to the animal due to handling, and that stress in itself can confound the measure. Consequently, it is desirable to find non-invasive alternatives. Panting score (PS), cortisol metabolites in faeces, milk, or hair, and the infrared temperature of external body surfaces are all potentially useful. Respiratory indicators are difficult and time consuming to record accurately, and cortisol metabolites are expensive and technically difficult to analyse. Infrared temperature appears to offer the best solution but requires further research to determine the thresholds that define when corrective actions are required to ensure optimal health and productivity. Research in this area has the potential to ultimately improve the welfare and profitability of cattle farming.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T13:33:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9a269a84f7a64842b59d8d432b0c0e80
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T13:33:06Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-9a269a84f7a64842b59d8d432b0c0e802023-11-21T07:47:06ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-01-011117110.3390/ani11010071Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in CattleMusadiq Idris0Jashim Uddin1Megan Sullivan2David M. McNeill3Clive J. C. Phillips4Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab 63100, PakistanCentre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, Gatton Campus, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, AustraliaSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, AustraliaCentre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, Gatton Campus, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, AustraliaCurtin University Sustainable Policy Institute, Kent St., Bentley, Perth, WA 6102, AustraliaCattle are susceptible to heat stress, especially those kept on high levels of nutrition for the purpose of maximising growth rates, which leads to a significant heat increment in their bodies. Consequences include compromised health and productivity and mortalities during extreme events, as well as serious economic loss. Some measures of heat stress, such as plasma cortisol and temperature in the rectum, vagina, or rumen, are invasive and therefore unlikely to be used on farms. These may cause additional stress to the animal due to handling, and that stress in itself can confound the measure. Consequently, it is desirable to find non-invasive alternatives. Panting score (PS), cortisol metabolites in faeces, milk, or hair, and the infrared temperature of external body surfaces are all potentially useful. Respiratory indicators are difficult and time consuming to record accurately, and cortisol metabolites are expensive and technically difficult to analyse. Infrared temperature appears to offer the best solution but requires further research to determine the thresholds that define when corrective actions are required to ensure optimal health and productivity. Research in this area has the potential to ultimately improve the welfare and profitability of cattle farming.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/1/71body temperatureheat stresshyperthermiafaecal corticosteroidinfrared thermography
spellingShingle Musadiq Idris
Jashim Uddin
Megan Sullivan
David M. McNeill
Clive J. C. Phillips
Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in Cattle
Animals
body temperature
heat stress
hyperthermia
faecal corticosteroid
infrared thermography
title Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in Cattle
title_full Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in Cattle
title_fullStr Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in Cattle
title_full_unstemmed Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in Cattle
title_short Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in Cattle
title_sort non invasive physiological indicators of heat stress in cattle
topic body temperature
heat stress
hyperthermia
faecal corticosteroid
infrared thermography
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/1/71
work_keys_str_mv AT musadiqidris noninvasivephysiologicalindicatorsofheatstressincattle
AT jashimuddin noninvasivephysiologicalindicatorsofheatstressincattle
AT megansullivan noninvasivephysiologicalindicatorsofheatstressincattle
AT davidmmcneill noninvasivephysiologicalindicatorsofheatstressincattle
AT clivejcphillips noninvasivephysiologicalindicatorsofheatstressincattle