Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in Cattle
Cattle are susceptible to heat stress, especially those kept on high levels of nutrition for the purpose of maximising growth rates, which leads to a significant heat increment in their bodies. Consequences include compromised health and productivity and mortalities during extreme events, as well as...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Animals |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/1/71 |
_version_ | 1797542545871339520 |
---|---|
author | Musadiq Idris Jashim Uddin Megan Sullivan David M. McNeill Clive J. C. Phillips |
author_facet | Musadiq Idris Jashim Uddin Megan Sullivan David M. McNeill Clive J. C. Phillips |
author_sort | Musadiq Idris |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Cattle are susceptible to heat stress, especially those kept on high levels of nutrition for the purpose of maximising growth rates, which leads to a significant heat increment in their bodies. Consequences include compromised health and productivity and mortalities during extreme events, as well as serious economic loss. Some measures of heat stress, such as plasma cortisol and temperature in the rectum, vagina, or rumen, are invasive and therefore unlikely to be used on farms. These may cause additional stress to the animal due to handling, and that stress in itself can confound the measure. Consequently, it is desirable to find non-invasive alternatives. Panting score (PS), cortisol metabolites in faeces, milk, or hair, and the infrared temperature of external body surfaces are all potentially useful. Respiratory indicators are difficult and time consuming to record accurately, and cortisol metabolites are expensive and technically difficult to analyse. Infrared temperature appears to offer the best solution but requires further research to determine the thresholds that define when corrective actions are required to ensure optimal health and productivity. Research in this area has the potential to ultimately improve the welfare and profitability of cattle farming. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T13:33:06Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9a269a84f7a64842b59d8d432b0c0e80 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-2615 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T13:33:06Z |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Animals |
spelling | doaj.art-9a269a84f7a64842b59d8d432b0c0e802023-11-21T07:47:06ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-01-011117110.3390/ani11010071Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in CattleMusadiq Idris0Jashim Uddin1Megan Sullivan2David M. McNeill3Clive J. C. Phillips4Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab 63100, PakistanCentre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, Gatton Campus, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, AustraliaSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, AustraliaCentre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, Gatton Campus, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, AustraliaCurtin University Sustainable Policy Institute, Kent St., Bentley, Perth, WA 6102, AustraliaCattle are susceptible to heat stress, especially those kept on high levels of nutrition for the purpose of maximising growth rates, which leads to a significant heat increment in their bodies. Consequences include compromised health and productivity and mortalities during extreme events, as well as serious economic loss. Some measures of heat stress, such as plasma cortisol and temperature in the rectum, vagina, or rumen, are invasive and therefore unlikely to be used on farms. These may cause additional stress to the animal due to handling, and that stress in itself can confound the measure. Consequently, it is desirable to find non-invasive alternatives. Panting score (PS), cortisol metabolites in faeces, milk, or hair, and the infrared temperature of external body surfaces are all potentially useful. Respiratory indicators are difficult and time consuming to record accurately, and cortisol metabolites are expensive and technically difficult to analyse. Infrared temperature appears to offer the best solution but requires further research to determine the thresholds that define when corrective actions are required to ensure optimal health and productivity. Research in this area has the potential to ultimately improve the welfare and profitability of cattle farming.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/1/71body temperatureheat stresshyperthermiafaecal corticosteroidinfrared thermography |
spellingShingle | Musadiq Idris Jashim Uddin Megan Sullivan David M. McNeill Clive J. C. Phillips Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in Cattle Animals body temperature heat stress hyperthermia faecal corticosteroid infrared thermography |
title | Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in Cattle |
title_full | Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in Cattle |
title_fullStr | Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in Cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in Cattle |
title_short | Non-Invasive Physiological Indicators of Heat Stress in Cattle |
title_sort | non invasive physiological indicators of heat stress in cattle |
topic | body temperature heat stress hyperthermia faecal corticosteroid infrared thermography |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/1/71 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT musadiqidris noninvasivephysiologicalindicatorsofheatstressincattle AT jashimuddin noninvasivephysiologicalindicatorsofheatstressincattle AT megansullivan noninvasivephysiologicalindicatorsofheatstressincattle AT davidmmcneill noninvasivephysiologicalindicatorsofheatstressincattle AT clivejcphillips noninvasivephysiologicalindicatorsofheatstressincattle |