The Evolution of Ion Charge States in Coronal Mass Ejections

We model the observed charge states of the elements C, O, Mg, Si, and Fe in the ejecta of coronal mass ejections (CMEs). We concentrate on “halo” CMEs observed in situ by the Advanced Composition Explorer/Solar Wind Ion Composition Spectrometer to measure ion charge states, and also remotely by the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Martin Laming, Elena Provornikova, Yuan-Kuen Ko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2023-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acebc2
_version_ 1827854392187944960
author J. Martin Laming
Elena Provornikova
Yuan-Kuen Ko
author_facet J. Martin Laming
Elena Provornikova
Yuan-Kuen Ko
author_sort J. Martin Laming
collection DOAJ
description We model the observed charge states of the elements C, O, Mg, Si, and Fe in the ejecta of coronal mass ejections (CMEs). We concentrate on “halo” CMEs observed in situ by the Advanced Composition Explorer/Solar Wind Ion Composition Spectrometer to measure ion charge states, and also remotely by the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory when in near quadrature with the Earth, so that the CME expansion can be accurately specified. Within this observed expansion, we integrate equations for the CME ejecta ionization balance, including electron heating parameterized as a fraction of the kinetic and gravitational energy gain of the CME. We also include the effects of non-Maxwellian electron distributions, characterized as a κ function. Focusing first on the 2010 April 3 CME, we find a somewhat better match to the observed charge states with κ close to the theoretical minimum value of κ = 3/2, implying a hard spectrum of nonthermal electrons. Similar but more significant results come from the 2011 February 15 event, although it is quite different in terms of its evolution. We discuss the implications of these values, and of the heating required, in terms of the magnetic reconnection Lundquist number and anomalous resistivity associated with CME evolution close to the Sun.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:22:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9a26b9ec41be4cb08e6428b2782d3759
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1538-4357
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:22:06Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal
spelling doaj.art-9a26b9ec41be4cb08e6428b2782d37592023-09-01T17:19:54ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572023-01-01954214510.3847/1538-4357/acebc2The Evolution of Ion Charge States in Coronal Mass EjectionsJ. Martin Laming0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3362-7040Elena Provornikova1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8875-7478Yuan-Kuen Ko2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8747-4772Space Science Division, Code 7684, Naval Research Laboratory , Washington DC 20375, USA ; j.laming@nrl.navy.milThe Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory , Laurel, MD 20723, USASpace Science Division, Code 7684, Naval Research Laboratory , Washington DC 20375, USA ; j.laming@nrl.navy.milWe model the observed charge states of the elements C, O, Mg, Si, and Fe in the ejecta of coronal mass ejections (CMEs). We concentrate on “halo” CMEs observed in situ by the Advanced Composition Explorer/Solar Wind Ion Composition Spectrometer to measure ion charge states, and also remotely by the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory when in near quadrature with the Earth, so that the CME expansion can be accurately specified. Within this observed expansion, we integrate equations for the CME ejecta ionization balance, including electron heating parameterized as a fraction of the kinetic and gravitational energy gain of the CME. We also include the effects of non-Maxwellian electron distributions, characterized as a κ function. Focusing first on the 2010 April 3 CME, we find a somewhat better match to the observed charge states with κ close to the theoretical minimum value of κ = 3/2, implying a hard spectrum of nonthermal electrons. Similar but more significant results come from the 2011 February 15 event, although it is quite different in terms of its evolution. We discuss the implications of these values, and of the heating required, in terms of the magnetic reconnection Lundquist number and anomalous resistivity associated with CME evolution close to the Sun.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acebc2Solar magnetic reconnectionSolar coronal mass ejectionsEjecta
spellingShingle J. Martin Laming
Elena Provornikova
Yuan-Kuen Ko
The Evolution of Ion Charge States in Coronal Mass Ejections
The Astrophysical Journal
Solar magnetic reconnection
Solar coronal mass ejections
Ejecta
title The Evolution of Ion Charge States in Coronal Mass Ejections
title_full The Evolution of Ion Charge States in Coronal Mass Ejections
title_fullStr The Evolution of Ion Charge States in Coronal Mass Ejections
title_full_unstemmed The Evolution of Ion Charge States in Coronal Mass Ejections
title_short The Evolution of Ion Charge States in Coronal Mass Ejections
title_sort evolution of ion charge states in coronal mass ejections
topic Solar magnetic reconnection
Solar coronal mass ejections
Ejecta
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acebc2
work_keys_str_mv AT jmartinlaming theevolutionofionchargestatesincoronalmassejections
AT elenaprovornikova theevolutionofionchargestatesincoronalmassejections
AT yuankuenko theevolutionofionchargestatesincoronalmassejections
AT jmartinlaming evolutionofionchargestatesincoronalmassejections
AT elenaprovornikova evolutionofionchargestatesincoronalmassejections
AT yuankuenko evolutionofionchargestatesincoronalmassejections