The effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of EFL students: An improvement over previous unfocused designs
The effectiveness of written corrective feedback (WCF) in the improvement of language learners' grammatical accuracy has been a topic of interest in SLA studies for the past couple of decades. The present study reports the findings of a three-month study investigating the effect...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Urmia University
2016-07-01
|
| Series: | Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.urmia.ac.ir/sites/www.urmia.ac.ir/files/1602%20%284%29.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818563881753116672 |
|---|---|
| author | Mobin Khanlarzadeh Majid Nemati |
| author_facet | Mobin Khanlarzadeh Majid Nemati |
| author_sort | Mobin Khanlarzadeh |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The effectiveness of written corrective feedback (WCF) in the improvement of language learners'
grammatical accuracy has been a topic of interest in SLA studies for the past couple of decades. The
present study reports the findings of a three-month study investigating the effect of direct unfocused
WCF on the grammatical accuracy of elementary students in an EFL context. The researchers selected
two intact classes totaling 33 students, and assigned each to a direct feedback group (n = 16) and a
control group (n = 17). The students produced eight pieces of writing (a pretest, three writing tasks
along with their revisions, and a posttest) from which their grammatical accuracy was obtained. The
results indicated that while the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in the
revision of the three writing tasks, no significant difference was found when the two groups produced
a new piece of writing after a one-month interval. The study concludes that accuracy improvement
caused by unfocused WCF during the revision process does not extend to EFL learners' future writing
when no feedback is available, at least at the elementary level. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T01:22:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9a331df1382e4874b6bdaace5e5e3bcd |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2322-1291 2322-1291 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T01:22:08Z |
| publishDate | 2016-07-01 |
| publisher | Urmia University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-9a331df1382e4874b6bdaace5e5e3bcd2022-12-21T23:22:21ZengUrmia UniversityIranian Journal of Language Teaching Research2322-12912322-12912016-07-01425568The effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of EFL students: An improvement over previous unfocused designsMobin Khanlarzadeh0Majid Nemati1Imam Khomeini International UniversityUniversity of TehranThe effectiveness of written corrective feedback (WCF) in the improvement of language learners' grammatical accuracy has been a topic of interest in SLA studies for the past couple of decades. The present study reports the findings of a three-month study investigating the effect of direct unfocused WCF on the grammatical accuracy of elementary students in an EFL context. The researchers selected two intact classes totaling 33 students, and assigned each to a direct feedback group (n = 16) and a control group (n = 17). The students produced eight pieces of writing (a pretest, three writing tasks along with their revisions, and a posttest) from which their grammatical accuracy was obtained. The results indicated that while the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in the revision of the three writing tasks, no significant difference was found when the two groups produced a new piece of writing after a one-month interval. The study concludes that accuracy improvement caused by unfocused WCF during the revision process does not extend to EFL learners' future writing when no feedback is available, at least at the elementary level.http://www.urmia.ac.ir/sites/www.urmia.ac.ir/files/1602%20%284%29.pdferror correctiongrammatical accuracygrammatical errorwritingwritten corrective feedback |
| spellingShingle | Mobin Khanlarzadeh Majid Nemati The effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of EFL students: An improvement over previous unfocused designs Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research error correction grammatical accuracy grammatical error writing written corrective feedback |
| title | The effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of EFL students: An improvement over previous unfocused designs |
| title_full | The effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of EFL students: An improvement over previous unfocused designs |
| title_fullStr | The effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of EFL students: An improvement over previous unfocused designs |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of EFL students: An improvement over previous unfocused designs |
| title_short | The effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of EFL students: An improvement over previous unfocused designs |
| title_sort | effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of efl students an improvement over previous unfocused designs |
| topic | error correction grammatical accuracy grammatical error writing written corrective feedback |
| url | http://www.urmia.ac.ir/sites/www.urmia.ac.ir/files/1602%20%284%29.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mobinkhanlarzadeh theeffectofwrittencorrectivefeedbackongrammaticalaccuracyofeflstudentsanimprovementoverpreviousunfocuseddesigns AT majidnemati theeffectofwrittencorrectivefeedbackongrammaticalaccuracyofeflstudentsanimprovementoverpreviousunfocuseddesigns AT mobinkhanlarzadeh effectofwrittencorrectivefeedbackongrammaticalaccuracyofeflstudentsanimprovementoverpreviousunfocuseddesigns AT majidnemati effectofwrittencorrectivefeedbackongrammaticalaccuracyofeflstudentsanimprovementoverpreviousunfocuseddesigns |