Effect of atmospheric gases, surface albedo and cloud overlap on the absorbed solar radiation

Recent studies have provided new evidence that models may systematically underestimate cloud solar absorption compared to observations. This study extends previous work on this "absorption anomaly'' by using observational data together with solar radiative transfer parameteris...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. Sinha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 1996-03-01
Series:Annales Geophysicae
Online Access:https://www.ann-geophys.net/14/329/1996/angeo-14-329-1996.pdf
_version_ 1818617424234151936
author A. Sinha
author_facet A. Sinha
author_sort A. Sinha
collection DOAJ
description Recent studies have provided new evidence that models may systematically underestimate cloud solar absorption compared to observations. This study extends previous work on this &quot;absorption anomaly'' by using observational data together with solar radiative transfer parameterisations to calculate <i>f</i><sub>s</sub> (the ratio of surface and top of the atmosphere net cloud forcings) and its latitudinal variation for a range of cloud types. Principally, it is found that (a) the zonal mean behaviour of <i>f</i><sub>s</sub> varies substantially with cloud type, with the highest values obtained for low clouds; (b) gaseous absorption and scattering can radically alter the pattern of the variation of <i>f</i><sub>s</sub> with latitude, but gaseous effects cannot in general raise <i>f</i><sub>s</sub> to the level of around 1.5 as recently determined; (c) the importance of the gaseous contribution to the atmospheric ASR is such that whilst <i>f</i><sub>s</sub> rises with surface albedo, the net cloud contribution to the atmospheric ASR falls; (d) the assumed form of the degree of cloud overlap in the model can substantially affect the cloud contribution to the atmospheric ASR whilst leaving the parameter <i>f</i><sub>s</sub> largely unaffected; (e) even large uncertainties in the observed optical depths alone cannot account for discrepancies apparent between modelled and newly observed cloud solar absorption. It is concluded that the main source of the anomaly may derive from the considerable uncertainties regarding impure droplet microphysics rather than, or together with, uncertainties in macroscopic quantities. Further, variable surface albedos and gaseous effects may limit the use of contemporaneous satellite and ground-based measurements to infer the cloud solar absorption from the parameter <i>f</i><sub>s</sub>.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T17:05:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9a46e1e425d04146921038ce417c8d33
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0992-7689
1432-0576
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T17:05:28Z
publishDate 1996-03-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Annales Geophysicae
spelling doaj.art-9a46e1e425d04146921038ce417c8d332022-12-21T22:23:35ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05761996-03-011432933510.1007/s00585-996-0329-7Effect of atmospheric gases, surface albedo and cloud overlap on the absorbed solar radiationA. SinhaRecent studies have provided new evidence that models may systematically underestimate cloud solar absorption compared to observations. This study extends previous work on this &quot;absorption anomaly'' by using observational data together with solar radiative transfer parameterisations to calculate <i>f</i><sub>s</sub> (the ratio of surface and top of the atmosphere net cloud forcings) and its latitudinal variation for a range of cloud types. Principally, it is found that (a) the zonal mean behaviour of <i>f</i><sub>s</sub> varies substantially with cloud type, with the highest values obtained for low clouds; (b) gaseous absorption and scattering can radically alter the pattern of the variation of <i>f</i><sub>s</sub> with latitude, but gaseous effects cannot in general raise <i>f</i><sub>s</sub> to the level of around 1.5 as recently determined; (c) the importance of the gaseous contribution to the atmospheric ASR is such that whilst <i>f</i><sub>s</sub> rises with surface albedo, the net cloud contribution to the atmospheric ASR falls; (d) the assumed form of the degree of cloud overlap in the model can substantially affect the cloud contribution to the atmospheric ASR whilst leaving the parameter <i>f</i><sub>s</sub> largely unaffected; (e) even large uncertainties in the observed optical depths alone cannot account for discrepancies apparent between modelled and newly observed cloud solar absorption. It is concluded that the main source of the anomaly may derive from the considerable uncertainties regarding impure droplet microphysics rather than, or together with, uncertainties in macroscopic quantities. Further, variable surface albedos and gaseous effects may limit the use of contemporaneous satellite and ground-based measurements to infer the cloud solar absorption from the parameter <i>f</i><sub>s</sub>.https://www.ann-geophys.net/14/329/1996/angeo-14-329-1996.pdf
spellingShingle A. Sinha
Effect of atmospheric gases, surface albedo and cloud overlap on the absorbed solar radiation
Annales Geophysicae
title Effect of atmospheric gases, surface albedo and cloud overlap on the absorbed solar radiation
title_full Effect of atmospheric gases, surface albedo and cloud overlap on the absorbed solar radiation
title_fullStr Effect of atmospheric gases, surface albedo and cloud overlap on the absorbed solar radiation
title_full_unstemmed Effect of atmospheric gases, surface albedo and cloud overlap on the absorbed solar radiation
title_short Effect of atmospheric gases, surface albedo and cloud overlap on the absorbed solar radiation
title_sort effect of atmospheric gases surface albedo and cloud overlap on the absorbed solar radiation
url https://www.ann-geophys.net/14/329/1996/angeo-14-329-1996.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT asinha effectofatmosphericgasessurfacealbedoandcloudoverlapontheabsorbedsolarradiation