Socio-demographic determinants and effect of structured personal diabetes care: a 19-year follow-up of the randomized controlled study diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP)

Abstract Background We investigated how four aspects of socio-demography influence the effectiveness of an intervention with structured personal diabetes care on long-term outcomes. Methods The Diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP) study is a cluster-randomized trial involving a population-based...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Heltberg, Volkert Siersma, John Sahl Andersen, Christina Ellervik, Henrik Brønnum-Hansen, Jakob Kragstrup, Niels de Fine Olivarius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-12-01
Series:BMC Endocrine Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12902-017-0227-x
_version_ 1818320565363015680
author Andreas Heltberg
Volkert Siersma
John Sahl Andersen
Christina Ellervik
Henrik Brønnum-Hansen
Jakob Kragstrup
Niels de Fine Olivarius
author_facet Andreas Heltberg
Volkert Siersma
John Sahl Andersen
Christina Ellervik
Henrik Brønnum-Hansen
Jakob Kragstrup
Niels de Fine Olivarius
author_sort Andreas Heltberg
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background We investigated how four aspects of socio-demography influence the effectiveness of an intervention with structured personal diabetes care on long-term outcomes. Methods The Diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP) study is a cluster-randomized trial involving a population-based sample of 1381 patients with newly diagnosed type 2-diabetes mellitus. We investigated how education, employment, cohabitation status and residence influenced the effectiveness of 6 years of intervention with structured personal diabetes care, resembling present day recommendations. Outcomes were incidence of any diabetes-related endpoint and death during 19 years after diagnosis, and cardiovascular risk factors, behaviour, attitudes and process-of-care variables 6 years after diagnosis. Results Structured personal care reduced the risk of any diabetes-related endpoint and the effect of the intervention was modified by geographical area (interaction p = 0.034) with HR of 0.71 (95%CI: 0.60–0.85) and of 1.07 (95%CI: 0.77–1.48), for patients in urban and rural areas, respectively. Otherwise, there was no effect modification of education, employment and civil status on the intervention for the final endpoints. There were no noticeable socio-demographic differences in the effect of the intervention on cardiovascular risk factors, behaviour, attitudes, and process-of-care. Conclusion Structured personal care reduced the aggregate outcome of any diabetes-related endpoint and independent of socio-demographic factors similar effect on cardiovascular risk factors, behaviour, attitudes and process of care, but the intervention did not change the existing inequity in mortality and morbidity. Residence modified the uptake of the intervention with patients living in urban areas having more to gain of the intervention than rural patients, further investigations is warranted. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT01074762 (February 24, 2010).
first_indexed 2024-12-13T10:27:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9a502c0c4a5247a887d412b2bc0e6009
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6823
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T10:27:02Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Endocrine Disorders
spelling doaj.art-9a502c0c4a5247a887d412b2bc0e60092022-12-21T23:51:00ZengBMCBMC Endocrine Disorders1472-68232017-12-0117111110.1186/s12902-017-0227-xSocio-demographic determinants and effect of structured personal diabetes care: a 19-year follow-up of the randomized controlled study diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP)Andreas Heltberg0Volkert Siersma1John Sahl Andersen2Christina Ellervik3Henrik Brønnum-Hansen4Jakob Kragstrup5Niels de Fine Olivarius6Section of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health SciencesThe Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of CopenhagenSection of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Production, Research, and InnovationDepartment of Social Medicine, University of CopenhagenSection of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health SciencesThe Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of CopenhagenAbstract Background We investigated how four aspects of socio-demography influence the effectiveness of an intervention with structured personal diabetes care on long-term outcomes. Methods The Diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP) study is a cluster-randomized trial involving a population-based sample of 1381 patients with newly diagnosed type 2-diabetes mellitus. We investigated how education, employment, cohabitation status and residence influenced the effectiveness of 6 years of intervention with structured personal diabetes care, resembling present day recommendations. Outcomes were incidence of any diabetes-related endpoint and death during 19 years after diagnosis, and cardiovascular risk factors, behaviour, attitudes and process-of-care variables 6 years after diagnosis. Results Structured personal care reduced the risk of any diabetes-related endpoint and the effect of the intervention was modified by geographical area (interaction p = 0.034) with HR of 0.71 (95%CI: 0.60–0.85) and of 1.07 (95%CI: 0.77–1.48), for patients in urban and rural areas, respectively. Otherwise, there was no effect modification of education, employment and civil status on the intervention for the final endpoints. There were no noticeable socio-demographic differences in the effect of the intervention on cardiovascular risk factors, behaviour, attitudes, and process-of-care. Conclusion Structured personal care reduced the aggregate outcome of any diabetes-related endpoint and independent of socio-demographic factors similar effect on cardiovascular risk factors, behaviour, attitudes and process of care, but the intervention did not change the existing inequity in mortality and morbidity. Residence modified the uptake of the intervention with patients living in urban areas having more to gain of the intervention than rural patients, further investigations is warranted. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT01074762 (February 24, 2010).http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12902-017-0227-xType 2 diabetes mellitusSocial inequalitiesInterventionClinical outcomes
spellingShingle Andreas Heltberg
Volkert Siersma
John Sahl Andersen
Christina Ellervik
Henrik Brønnum-Hansen
Jakob Kragstrup
Niels de Fine Olivarius
Socio-demographic determinants and effect of structured personal diabetes care: a 19-year follow-up of the randomized controlled study diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP)
BMC Endocrine Disorders
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Social inequalities
Intervention
Clinical outcomes
title Socio-demographic determinants and effect of structured personal diabetes care: a 19-year follow-up of the randomized controlled study diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP)
title_full Socio-demographic determinants and effect of structured personal diabetes care: a 19-year follow-up of the randomized controlled study diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP)
title_fullStr Socio-demographic determinants and effect of structured personal diabetes care: a 19-year follow-up of the randomized controlled study diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP)
title_full_unstemmed Socio-demographic determinants and effect of structured personal diabetes care: a 19-year follow-up of the randomized controlled study diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP)
title_short Socio-demographic determinants and effect of structured personal diabetes care: a 19-year follow-up of the randomized controlled study diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP)
title_sort socio demographic determinants and effect of structured personal diabetes care a 19 year follow up of the randomized controlled study diabetes care in general practice dcgp
topic Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Social inequalities
Intervention
Clinical outcomes
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12902-017-0227-x
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasheltberg sociodemographicdeterminantsandeffectofstructuredpersonaldiabetescarea19yearfollowupoftherandomizedcontrolledstudydiabetescareingeneralpracticedcgp
AT volkertsiersma sociodemographicdeterminantsandeffectofstructuredpersonaldiabetescarea19yearfollowupoftherandomizedcontrolledstudydiabetescareingeneralpracticedcgp
AT johnsahlandersen sociodemographicdeterminantsandeffectofstructuredpersonaldiabetescarea19yearfollowupoftherandomizedcontrolledstudydiabetescareingeneralpracticedcgp
AT christinaellervik sociodemographicdeterminantsandeffectofstructuredpersonaldiabetescarea19yearfollowupoftherandomizedcontrolledstudydiabetescareingeneralpracticedcgp
AT henrikbrønnumhansen sociodemographicdeterminantsandeffectofstructuredpersonaldiabetescarea19yearfollowupoftherandomizedcontrolledstudydiabetescareingeneralpracticedcgp
AT jakobkragstrup sociodemographicdeterminantsandeffectofstructuredpersonaldiabetescarea19yearfollowupoftherandomizedcontrolledstudydiabetescareingeneralpracticedcgp
AT nielsdefineolivarius sociodemographicdeterminantsandeffectofstructuredpersonaldiabetescarea19yearfollowupoftherandomizedcontrolledstudydiabetescareingeneralpracticedcgp