Improvements of Design for Safety in Construction through Multi-Participants Perception Analysis

For several decades, the number of reported accidents and fatal incidents in the construction industry has remained high compared to those in other industries. Therefore, many studies have been conducted in an effort to reduce accidents and fatal incidents in the construction industry. Recently, con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jayho Soh, Jaewook Jeong, Jaemin Jeong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/13/4550
_version_ 1797563741462593536
author Jayho Soh
Jaewook Jeong
Jaemin Jeong
author_facet Jayho Soh
Jaewook Jeong
Jaemin Jeong
author_sort Jayho Soh
collection DOAJ
description For several decades, the number of reported accidents and fatal incidents in the construction industry has remained high compared to those in other industries. Therefore, many studies have been conducted in an effort to reduce accidents and fatal incidents in the construction industry. Recently, construction safety management has shifted from the construction phase to the pre-construction phase, ultimately to eliminate fatal incidents. In line with this change, South Korea enacted the Design for Safety (DfS) process in 2016. However, the current DfS process remains not well implemented for several reasons. Therefore, this study aims to present eight alternatives to improve the DfS process and suggests DfS improvement priorities by considering construction project participants and career levels using what is known as a fuzzy-analytical hierarchy process (F-AHP) analysis. The results of this study are as follows. First, respondents overall suggested improvements in the area of ‘assignment of responsibility for DfS to the client’ (0.196). Second, improvement priorities were also identified according to construction project participants and career levels. The results of the study can be utilized as basic information for DfS improvements during construction projects.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T18:47:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9a59f62c53ac478fa7e6166b3d7b6bd5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T18:47:41Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-9a59f62c53ac478fa7e6166b3d7b6bd52023-11-20T05:25:13ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-06-011013455010.3390/app10134550Improvements of Design for Safety in Construction through Multi-Participants Perception AnalysisJayho Soh0Jaewook Jeong1Jaemin Jeong2Department of Safety Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 232 Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01811, KoreaDepartment of Safety Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 232 Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01811, KoreaDepartment of Safety Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 232 Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01811, KoreaFor several decades, the number of reported accidents and fatal incidents in the construction industry has remained high compared to those in other industries. Therefore, many studies have been conducted in an effort to reduce accidents and fatal incidents in the construction industry. Recently, construction safety management has shifted from the construction phase to the pre-construction phase, ultimately to eliminate fatal incidents. In line with this change, South Korea enacted the Design for Safety (DfS) process in 2016. However, the current DfS process remains not well implemented for several reasons. Therefore, this study aims to present eight alternatives to improve the DfS process and suggests DfS improvement priorities by considering construction project participants and career levels using what is known as a fuzzy-analytical hierarchy process (F-AHP) analysis. The results of this study are as follows. First, respondents overall suggested improvements in the area of ‘assignment of responsibility for DfS to the client’ (0.196). Second, improvement priorities were also identified according to construction project participants and career levels. The results of the study can be utilized as basic information for DfS improvements during construction projects.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/13/4550Design for Safetyconstruction safetyFuzzy-Analytical Hierarchy ProcessConstruction project participants
spellingShingle Jayho Soh
Jaewook Jeong
Jaemin Jeong
Improvements of Design for Safety in Construction through Multi-Participants Perception Analysis
Applied Sciences
Design for Safety
construction safety
Fuzzy-Analytical Hierarchy Process
Construction project participants
title Improvements of Design for Safety in Construction through Multi-Participants Perception Analysis
title_full Improvements of Design for Safety in Construction through Multi-Participants Perception Analysis
title_fullStr Improvements of Design for Safety in Construction through Multi-Participants Perception Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Improvements of Design for Safety in Construction through Multi-Participants Perception Analysis
title_short Improvements of Design for Safety in Construction through Multi-Participants Perception Analysis
title_sort improvements of design for safety in construction through multi participants perception analysis
topic Design for Safety
construction safety
Fuzzy-Analytical Hierarchy Process
Construction project participants
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/13/4550
work_keys_str_mv AT jayhosoh improvementsofdesignforsafetyinconstructionthroughmultiparticipantsperceptionanalysis
AT jaewookjeong improvementsofdesignforsafetyinconstructionthroughmultiparticipantsperceptionanalysis
AT jaeminjeong improvementsofdesignforsafetyinconstructionthroughmultiparticipantsperceptionanalysis