Quality assuring “Plan of the day” selection in a multicentre adaptive bladder trial: Implementation of a pre-accrual IGRT guidance and assessment module

Background and purpose: Hypofractionated bladder RT with or without image guided adaptive planning (HYBRID) is a multicentre clinical trial investigating “Plan of the Day” (PoD) adaptive radiotherapy for bladder cancer. To ensure correct PoD selection a pre-accrual guidance and assessment module was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma Patel, Yat Tsang, Angela Baker, Jenny Callender, Shaista Hafeez, Emma Hall, Vibeke Nordmark Hansen, Rebecca Lewis, Helen McNair, Elizabeth Miles, Robert Huddart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-11-01
Series:Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630819300023
_version_ 1818672967823917056
author Emma Patel
Yat Tsang
Angela Baker
Jenny Callender
Shaista Hafeez
Emma Hall
Vibeke Nordmark Hansen
Rebecca Lewis
Helen McNair
Elizabeth Miles
Robert Huddart
author_facet Emma Patel
Yat Tsang
Angela Baker
Jenny Callender
Shaista Hafeez
Emma Hall
Vibeke Nordmark Hansen
Rebecca Lewis
Helen McNair
Elizabeth Miles
Robert Huddart
author_sort Emma Patel
collection DOAJ
description Background and purpose: Hypofractionated bladder RT with or without image guided adaptive planning (HYBRID) is a multicentre clinical trial investigating “Plan of the Day” (PoD) adaptive radiotherapy for bladder cancer. To ensure correct PoD selection a pre-accrual guidance and assessment module was developed as part of an image guided radiotherapy quality assurance (IGRT QA) credentialing programme. This study aimed to evaluate its feasibility and effectiveness across multiple recruiting centres. Materials and methods: Individuals from participating centres remotely accessed an image database in order to complete the PoD module. An assessment score of ≥83% was required in order to receive QA approval. A questionnaire was used to gather user feedback on the module. PoD decisions for the first patient at each recruiting centre were retrospectively reviewed for protocol adherence. Results: 71 radiation therapists (RTTs) from 10 centres completed the PoD module. The median assessment score was 92% (Range: 58–100%) with 79% of RTTs passing the assessment on first attempt. All questionnaire respondents reported that the PoD module prepared them for plan selection. In 51/60 of on-trial treatments reviewed, the PoD selected by the centre agreed with QA reviewers. Conclusions: The PoD QA module was successfully implemented in a multicentre trial and enabled pre-accrual assessment of protocol understanding. This increased operator confidence and resulted in appropriate PoD selection on-trial. Keywords: IGRT, Adaptive, Bladder, Radiotherapy, Trial QA
first_indexed 2024-12-17T07:48:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9a71aebad6584338922ccab287ba8b16
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-6308
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T07:48:19Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj.art-9a71aebad6584338922ccab287ba8b162022-12-21T21:57:55ZengElsevierClinical and Translational Radiation Oncology2405-63082019-11-01192732Quality assuring “Plan of the day” selection in a multicentre adaptive bladder trial: Implementation of a pre-accrual IGRT guidance and assessment moduleEmma Patel0Yat Tsang1Angela Baker2Jenny Callender3Shaista Hafeez4Emma Hall5Vibeke Nordmark Hansen6Rebecca Lewis7Helen McNair8Elizabeth Miles9Robert Huddart10Radiotherapy Physics Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomNational Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom; Corresponding author at: National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood HA6 2RN, United Kingdom.Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United KingdomUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, United KingdomDepartment of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research & The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United KingdomDepartment of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research & The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United KingdomDepartment of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research & The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomNational Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United KingdomDepartment of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research & The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomBackground and purpose: Hypofractionated bladder RT with or without image guided adaptive planning (HYBRID) is a multicentre clinical trial investigating “Plan of the Day” (PoD) adaptive radiotherapy for bladder cancer. To ensure correct PoD selection a pre-accrual guidance and assessment module was developed as part of an image guided radiotherapy quality assurance (IGRT QA) credentialing programme. This study aimed to evaluate its feasibility and effectiveness across multiple recruiting centres. Materials and methods: Individuals from participating centres remotely accessed an image database in order to complete the PoD module. An assessment score of ≥83% was required in order to receive QA approval. A questionnaire was used to gather user feedback on the module. PoD decisions for the first patient at each recruiting centre were retrospectively reviewed for protocol adherence. Results: 71 radiation therapists (RTTs) from 10 centres completed the PoD module. The median assessment score was 92% (Range: 58–100%) with 79% of RTTs passing the assessment on first attempt. All questionnaire respondents reported that the PoD module prepared them for plan selection. In 51/60 of on-trial treatments reviewed, the PoD selected by the centre agreed with QA reviewers. Conclusions: The PoD QA module was successfully implemented in a multicentre trial and enabled pre-accrual assessment of protocol understanding. This increased operator confidence and resulted in appropriate PoD selection on-trial. Keywords: IGRT, Adaptive, Bladder, Radiotherapy, Trial QAhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630819300023
spellingShingle Emma Patel
Yat Tsang
Angela Baker
Jenny Callender
Shaista Hafeez
Emma Hall
Vibeke Nordmark Hansen
Rebecca Lewis
Helen McNair
Elizabeth Miles
Robert Huddart
Quality assuring “Plan of the day” selection in a multicentre adaptive bladder trial: Implementation of a pre-accrual IGRT guidance and assessment module
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
title Quality assuring “Plan of the day” selection in a multicentre adaptive bladder trial: Implementation of a pre-accrual IGRT guidance and assessment module
title_full Quality assuring “Plan of the day” selection in a multicentre adaptive bladder trial: Implementation of a pre-accrual IGRT guidance and assessment module
title_fullStr Quality assuring “Plan of the day” selection in a multicentre adaptive bladder trial: Implementation of a pre-accrual IGRT guidance and assessment module
title_full_unstemmed Quality assuring “Plan of the day” selection in a multicentre adaptive bladder trial: Implementation of a pre-accrual IGRT guidance and assessment module
title_short Quality assuring “Plan of the day” selection in a multicentre adaptive bladder trial: Implementation of a pre-accrual IGRT guidance and assessment module
title_sort quality assuring plan of the day selection in a multicentre adaptive bladder trial implementation of a pre accrual igrt guidance and assessment module
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630819300023
work_keys_str_mv AT emmapatel qualityassuringplanofthedayselectioninamulticentreadaptivebladdertrialimplementationofapreaccrualigrtguidanceandassessmentmodule
AT yattsang qualityassuringplanofthedayselectioninamulticentreadaptivebladdertrialimplementationofapreaccrualigrtguidanceandassessmentmodule
AT angelabaker qualityassuringplanofthedayselectioninamulticentreadaptivebladdertrialimplementationofapreaccrualigrtguidanceandassessmentmodule
AT jennycallender qualityassuringplanofthedayselectioninamulticentreadaptivebladdertrialimplementationofapreaccrualigrtguidanceandassessmentmodule
AT shaistahafeez qualityassuringplanofthedayselectioninamulticentreadaptivebladdertrialimplementationofapreaccrualigrtguidanceandassessmentmodule
AT emmahall qualityassuringplanofthedayselectioninamulticentreadaptivebladdertrialimplementationofapreaccrualigrtguidanceandassessmentmodule
AT vibekenordmarkhansen qualityassuringplanofthedayselectioninamulticentreadaptivebladdertrialimplementationofapreaccrualigrtguidanceandassessmentmodule
AT rebeccalewis qualityassuringplanofthedayselectioninamulticentreadaptivebladdertrialimplementationofapreaccrualigrtguidanceandassessmentmodule
AT helenmcnair qualityassuringplanofthedayselectioninamulticentreadaptivebladdertrialimplementationofapreaccrualigrtguidanceandassessmentmodule
AT elizabethmiles qualityassuringplanofthedayselectioninamulticentreadaptivebladdertrialimplementationofapreaccrualigrtguidanceandassessmentmodule
AT roberthuddart qualityassuringplanofthedayselectioninamulticentreadaptivebladdertrialimplementationofapreaccrualigrtguidanceandassessmentmodule