Job characteristics and the subjective oral health of Australian workers

Abstract Abstract: The way in which work is structured and organised is associated with the health and well‐being of workers. Objectives: To examine the associations between hours worked, job security, skill maintenance and work and home interference and subjective oral health; and to compare findin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne E. Sanders, A. John Spencer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2004-06-01
Series:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.tb00705.x
_version_ 1827846520938954752
author Anne E. Sanders
A. John Spencer
author_facet Anne E. Sanders
A. John Spencer
author_sort Anne E. Sanders
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Abstract: The way in which work is structured and organised is associated with the health and well‐being of workers. Objectives: To examine the associations between hours worked, job security, skill maintenance and work and home interference and subjective oral health; and to compare findings for different occupational groups. Methods: Data were collected in 1999 from a random stratified sample of households in all Australian States and Territories using a telephone interview and a questionnaire survey. Subjective oral health was evaluated with the short form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP‐14), which assesses the adverse impact of oral conditions on quality of life. Results: Data were obtained for 2,347 dentate adults in the workforce. In the 12 months preceding the survey, 51.9% had experienced oral pain and 31.0% reported psychological discomfort from dental problems. Males, young adults, Australian‐born workers, and those in upper‐white collar occupations reported lower mean OHIP‐14 scores (ANOVA p<0.001). Having controlled for the effects sex, age, country of birth and socio‐economic factors in a linear multiple regression analysis, hours worked, skill maintenance and work and home interference were significantly associated with OHIP‐14 scores for all workers. While part‐time work was associated with higher OHIP‐14 among upper white‐collar workers, working >40 hours a week was associated with higher OHIP‐14 scores for other workers. Conclusions: Aspects of the work environment are associated with the subjective oral health of workers. Because these contexts are subject to only limited control by individual workers, their influence is a public health issue.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T09:16:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9a801ff5fac54028819b84251573c3ab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1326-0200
1753-6405
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T09:16:09Z
publishDate 2004-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
spelling doaj.art-9a801ff5fac54028819b84251573c3ab2023-09-02T14:47:27ZengElsevierAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052004-06-0128325926610.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.tb00705.xJob characteristics and the subjective oral health of Australian workersAnne E. Sanders0A. John Spencer1Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Dental School, University of Adelaide, South AustraliaAustralian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Dental School, University of Adelaide, South AustraliaAbstract Abstract: The way in which work is structured and organised is associated with the health and well‐being of workers. Objectives: To examine the associations between hours worked, job security, skill maintenance and work and home interference and subjective oral health; and to compare findings for different occupational groups. Methods: Data were collected in 1999 from a random stratified sample of households in all Australian States and Territories using a telephone interview and a questionnaire survey. Subjective oral health was evaluated with the short form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP‐14), which assesses the adverse impact of oral conditions on quality of life. Results: Data were obtained for 2,347 dentate adults in the workforce. In the 12 months preceding the survey, 51.9% had experienced oral pain and 31.0% reported psychological discomfort from dental problems. Males, young adults, Australian‐born workers, and those in upper‐white collar occupations reported lower mean OHIP‐14 scores (ANOVA p<0.001). Having controlled for the effects sex, age, country of birth and socio‐economic factors in a linear multiple regression analysis, hours worked, skill maintenance and work and home interference were significantly associated with OHIP‐14 scores for all workers. While part‐time work was associated with higher OHIP‐14 among upper white‐collar workers, working >40 hours a week was associated with higher OHIP‐14 scores for other workers. Conclusions: Aspects of the work environment are associated with the subjective oral health of workers. Because these contexts are subject to only limited control by individual workers, their influence is a public health issue.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.tb00705.x
spellingShingle Anne E. Sanders
A. John Spencer
Job characteristics and the subjective oral health of Australian workers
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
title Job characteristics and the subjective oral health of Australian workers
title_full Job characteristics and the subjective oral health of Australian workers
title_fullStr Job characteristics and the subjective oral health of Australian workers
title_full_unstemmed Job characteristics and the subjective oral health of Australian workers
title_short Job characteristics and the subjective oral health of Australian workers
title_sort job characteristics and the subjective oral health of australian workers
url https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.tb00705.x
work_keys_str_mv AT anneesanders jobcharacteristicsandthesubjectiveoralhealthofaustralianworkers
AT ajohnspencer jobcharacteristicsandthesubjectiveoralhealthofaustralianworkers