Host strain specific sex pheromone variation in <it>Spodoptera frugiperda</it>

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The fall armyworm <it>Spodoptera frugiperda </it>(Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) consists of two distinct strains with different host plant preferences for corn and rice. To assess whether pheromonal-mediated behavioral isolatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Svatos Ales, Lorenz Sybille, Schöfl Gerhard, Marr Melanie, Groot Astrid T, Heckel David G
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Zoology
Online Access:http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/5/1/20
_version_ 1818939118472658944
author Svatos Ales
Lorenz Sybille
Schöfl Gerhard
Marr Melanie
Groot Astrid T
Heckel David G
author_facet Svatos Ales
Lorenz Sybille
Schöfl Gerhard
Marr Melanie
Groot Astrid T
Heckel David G
author_sort Svatos Ales
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The fall armyworm <it>Spodoptera frugiperda </it>(Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) consists of two distinct strains with different host plant preferences for corn and rice. To assess whether pheromonal-mediated behavioral isolation accompanies the habitat isolation on different host plants, we compared the sex pheromone composition among females of the two strains. Pheromone glands were extracted with or without injection of pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide (PBAN). To assess the mode of inheritance of this variation, we also analyzed the pheromone composition of F<sub>1 </sub>hybrid females.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Relative to intra-strain variation, the pheromone composition of the two strains differed significantly. Corn strain females contained significantly more of the second most abundant pheromone compound Z11-16:Ac (m), and significantly less of most other compounds, than rice strain females. When females were injected with PBAN before their glands were extracted, the differences between the strains were less pronounced but still statistically significant. The pheromone composition of hybrid females showed a maternal inheritance of the major component Z9-14:Ac (M) as well as of Z11-16:Ac (m). Most other compounds showed an inheritance indicating genetic dominance of the corn strain. The within-strain phenotypic correlations among the various components were consistent with their hypothesized biosynthetic pathway, and between-strain differences in the correlation structure suggested candidate genes that may explain the pheromone differences between the two strains. These include Δ9- and Δ11 desaturases, and possibly also a Δ7-desaturase, although the latter has not been identified in insects so far.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The two host strains of <it>S. frugiperda </it>produce systematically differing female sex pheromone blends. Previously-documented geographic variation in the sexual communication of this species did not take strain identity into account, and thus may be partly explained by different strain occurrence in different regions. The finding of pheromone differences reinforces the possibility of incipient reproductive isolation among these strains, previously shown to differ in the timing of nocturnal mating activity and host plant use. Finding the genetic basis of the pheromone differences, as well as these other biological traits, will help to elucidate the role of premating isolation in the continuing differentiation of these two strains that may eventually lead to speciation.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-20T06:18:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9a913bf7a2c24ef5b8f55676e1d6958c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1742-9994
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T06:18:40Z
publishDate 2008-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Zoology
spelling doaj.art-9a913bf7a2c24ef5b8f55676e1d6958c2022-12-21T19:50:29ZengBMCFrontiers in Zoology1742-99942008-12-01512010.1186/1742-9994-5-20Host strain specific sex pheromone variation in <it>Spodoptera frugiperda</it>Svatos AlesLorenz SybilleSchöfl GerhardMarr MelanieGroot Astrid THeckel David G<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The fall armyworm <it>Spodoptera frugiperda </it>(Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) consists of two distinct strains with different host plant preferences for corn and rice. To assess whether pheromonal-mediated behavioral isolation accompanies the habitat isolation on different host plants, we compared the sex pheromone composition among females of the two strains. Pheromone glands were extracted with or without injection of pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide (PBAN). To assess the mode of inheritance of this variation, we also analyzed the pheromone composition of F<sub>1 </sub>hybrid females.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Relative to intra-strain variation, the pheromone composition of the two strains differed significantly. Corn strain females contained significantly more of the second most abundant pheromone compound Z11-16:Ac (m), and significantly less of most other compounds, than rice strain females. When females were injected with PBAN before their glands were extracted, the differences between the strains were less pronounced but still statistically significant. The pheromone composition of hybrid females showed a maternal inheritance of the major component Z9-14:Ac (M) as well as of Z11-16:Ac (m). Most other compounds showed an inheritance indicating genetic dominance of the corn strain. The within-strain phenotypic correlations among the various components were consistent with their hypothesized biosynthetic pathway, and between-strain differences in the correlation structure suggested candidate genes that may explain the pheromone differences between the two strains. These include Δ9- and Δ11 desaturases, and possibly also a Δ7-desaturase, although the latter has not been identified in insects so far.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The two host strains of <it>S. frugiperda </it>produce systematically differing female sex pheromone blends. Previously-documented geographic variation in the sexual communication of this species did not take strain identity into account, and thus may be partly explained by different strain occurrence in different regions. The finding of pheromone differences reinforces the possibility of incipient reproductive isolation among these strains, previously shown to differ in the timing of nocturnal mating activity and host plant use. Finding the genetic basis of the pheromone differences, as well as these other biological traits, will help to elucidate the role of premating isolation in the continuing differentiation of these two strains that may eventually lead to speciation.</p>http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/5/1/20
spellingShingle Svatos Ales
Lorenz Sybille
Schöfl Gerhard
Marr Melanie
Groot Astrid T
Heckel David G
Host strain specific sex pheromone variation in <it>Spodoptera frugiperda</it>
Frontiers in Zoology
title Host strain specific sex pheromone variation in <it>Spodoptera frugiperda</it>
title_full Host strain specific sex pheromone variation in <it>Spodoptera frugiperda</it>
title_fullStr Host strain specific sex pheromone variation in <it>Spodoptera frugiperda</it>
title_full_unstemmed Host strain specific sex pheromone variation in <it>Spodoptera frugiperda</it>
title_short Host strain specific sex pheromone variation in <it>Spodoptera frugiperda</it>
title_sort host strain specific sex pheromone variation in it spodoptera frugiperda it
url http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/5/1/20
work_keys_str_mv AT svatosales hoststrainspecificsexpheromonevariationinitspodopterafrugiperdait
AT lorenzsybille hoststrainspecificsexpheromonevariationinitspodopterafrugiperdait
AT schoflgerhard hoststrainspecificsexpheromonevariationinitspodopterafrugiperdait
AT marrmelanie hoststrainspecificsexpheromonevariationinitspodopterafrugiperdait
AT grootastridt hoststrainspecificsexpheromonevariationinitspodopterafrugiperdait
AT heckeldavidg hoststrainspecificsexpheromonevariationinitspodopterafrugiperdait