Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group report
Introduction:: Potential consequences of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) need evaluation for patients considering urinary tract reconstruction for benign disease. A working group was formed by the International Continence Society, which considered urinary tract reconstruction in IBD. Methods:: Nomi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Continence |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973722000091 |
_version_ | 1818859553417068544 |
---|---|
author | N. Sihra A. Williams A. Emmanuel N. Zarate Lopez A. Sahai R. Hamid L. Neshatian I. Paquette G.A. Santoro F.L. Heldwein N. Thakare A. Higazy E. Aytac L. Mansell L. Thomas M.J. Drake R. Barratt |
author_facet | N. Sihra A. Williams A. Emmanuel N. Zarate Lopez A. Sahai R. Hamid L. Neshatian I. Paquette G.A. Santoro F.L. Heldwein N. Thakare A. Higazy E. Aytac L. Mansell L. Thomas M.J. Drake R. Barratt |
author_sort | N. Sihra |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction:: Potential consequences of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) need evaluation for patients considering urinary tract reconstruction for benign disease. A working group was formed by the International Continence Society, which considered urinary tract reconstruction in IBD. Methods:: Nominal group technique was used to derive consensus. Principal aspects of IBD assessment and surgery decision-making were agreed. A questionnaire was used to facilitate the generation of statements by a core focus group of experts, which were modified and ratified by the wider working group. This was followed by final voting by the full working group. Results:: General considerations included identifying the importance of the specialist IBD multi-disciplinary team. Peri-operative considerations recommended avoiding pre-operative fasting from midnight, and using an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Selection of bowel segment, pre-operative optimisation and post-operative issues were considered for both Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease. UC is not an absolute contraindication to urinary tract reconstruction using small or large bowel. Elective reconstructive surgery should wait at least three months following resolution of any acute UC flare-up to correct all abnormalities. Crohn’s disease is a high-risk disease for urinary tract reconstruction, even if in remission. In Crohn’s, reconstructive surgical options are limited by the location and extent of gastrointestinal segment(s) affected and the phenotype of disease. Conclusion:: The consensus opinion indicates that urinary tract reconstruction using bowel segments is feasible in carefully selected and optimised patients with IBD lacking alternative management options, provided there is access to appropriate multidisciplinary skills. UC is relatively low risk for surgical procedures, whereas Crohn’s has considerably increased risk of morbidity. The potential risks must be properly discussed with patients considering reconstructive urological procedures. Outcomes should be carefully monitored and published to identify the safety and efficacy of reconstructive surgery in IBD, including full description of the disease status. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T09:14:01Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9a9c237f3471404ea33a18db26e17c70 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2772-9737 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-19T09:14:01Z |
publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Continence |
spelling | doaj.art-9a9c237f3471404ea33a18db26e17c702022-12-21T20:28:08ZengElsevierContinence2772-97372022-03-011100018Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group reportN. Sihra0A. Williams1A. Emmanuel2N. Zarate Lopez3A. Sahai4R. Hamid5L. Neshatian6I. Paquette7G.A. Santoro8F.L. Heldwein9N. Thakare10A. Higazy11E. Aytac12L. Mansell13L. Thomas14M.J. Drake15R. Barratt16Department of Urology, Guy’s & St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKDepartment of Colourectal Surgery, Guy’s & St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKDepartment of Urology, Guy’s & St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKDepartment of Urology, University College Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, USADepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati OH, USADepartment of General and Colourectal Surgery, AULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, University of Padua, Treviso, ItalyDepartment of Urology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, BrazilDepartment of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, UKDepartment of Urology, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, EgyptDepartment of General Surgery, Acibadem University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of Pelvic Floor Physiotherapy, Governors State University, University Park, IL, USABristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UKBristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK; Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Corresponding author at: Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.Department of Urology, University College Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKIntroduction:: Potential consequences of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) need evaluation for patients considering urinary tract reconstruction for benign disease. A working group was formed by the International Continence Society, which considered urinary tract reconstruction in IBD. Methods:: Nominal group technique was used to derive consensus. Principal aspects of IBD assessment and surgery decision-making were agreed. A questionnaire was used to facilitate the generation of statements by a core focus group of experts, which were modified and ratified by the wider working group. This was followed by final voting by the full working group. Results:: General considerations included identifying the importance of the specialist IBD multi-disciplinary team. Peri-operative considerations recommended avoiding pre-operative fasting from midnight, and using an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Selection of bowel segment, pre-operative optimisation and post-operative issues were considered for both Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease. UC is not an absolute contraindication to urinary tract reconstruction using small or large bowel. Elective reconstructive surgery should wait at least three months following resolution of any acute UC flare-up to correct all abnormalities. Crohn’s disease is a high-risk disease for urinary tract reconstruction, even if in remission. In Crohn’s, reconstructive surgical options are limited by the location and extent of gastrointestinal segment(s) affected and the phenotype of disease. Conclusion:: The consensus opinion indicates that urinary tract reconstruction using bowel segments is feasible in carefully selected and optimised patients with IBD lacking alternative management options, provided there is access to appropriate multidisciplinary skills. UC is relatively low risk for surgical procedures, whereas Crohn’s has considerably increased risk of morbidity. The potential risks must be properly discussed with patients considering reconstructive urological procedures. Outcomes should be carefully monitored and published to identify the safety and efficacy of reconstructive surgery in IBD, including full description of the disease status.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973722000091Urinary tract reconstructionUrinary diversionCystectomyInflammatory bowel diseaseCrohn’s diseaseUlcerative colitis |
spellingShingle | N. Sihra A. Williams A. Emmanuel N. Zarate Lopez A. Sahai R. Hamid L. Neshatian I. Paquette G.A. Santoro F.L. Heldwein N. Thakare A. Higazy E. Aytac L. Mansell L. Thomas M.J. Drake R. Barratt Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group report Continence Urinary tract reconstruction Urinary diversion Cystectomy Inflammatory bowel disease Crohn’s disease Ulcerative colitis |
title | Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group report |
title_full | Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group report |
title_fullStr | Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group report |
title_full_unstemmed | Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group report |
title_short | Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group report |
title_sort | implications of inflammatory bowel disease for reconstructive surgery in non malignant urinary tract dysfunction an international continence society working group report |
topic | Urinary tract reconstruction Urinary diversion Cystectomy Inflammatory bowel disease Crohn’s disease Ulcerative colitis |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973722000091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nsihra implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT awilliams implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT aemmanuel implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT nzaratelopez implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT asahai implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT rhamid implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT lneshatian implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT ipaquette implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT gasantoro implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT flheldwein implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT nthakare implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT ahigazy implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT eaytac implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT lmansell implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT lthomas implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT mjdrake implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport AT rbarratt implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport |