Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group report

Introduction:: Potential consequences of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) need evaluation for patients considering urinary tract reconstruction for benign disease. A working group was formed by the International Continence Society, which considered urinary tract reconstruction in IBD. Methods:: Nomi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Sihra, A. Williams, A. Emmanuel, N. Zarate Lopez, A. Sahai, R. Hamid, L. Neshatian, I. Paquette, G.A. Santoro, F.L. Heldwein, N. Thakare, A. Higazy, E. Aytac, L. Mansell, L. Thomas, M.J. Drake, R. Barratt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-03-01
Series:Continence
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973722000091
_version_ 1818859553417068544
author N. Sihra
A. Williams
A. Emmanuel
N. Zarate Lopez
A. Sahai
R. Hamid
L. Neshatian
I. Paquette
G.A. Santoro
F.L. Heldwein
N. Thakare
A. Higazy
E. Aytac
L. Mansell
L. Thomas
M.J. Drake
R. Barratt
author_facet N. Sihra
A. Williams
A. Emmanuel
N. Zarate Lopez
A. Sahai
R. Hamid
L. Neshatian
I. Paquette
G.A. Santoro
F.L. Heldwein
N. Thakare
A. Higazy
E. Aytac
L. Mansell
L. Thomas
M.J. Drake
R. Barratt
author_sort N. Sihra
collection DOAJ
description Introduction:: Potential consequences of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) need evaluation for patients considering urinary tract reconstruction for benign disease. A working group was formed by the International Continence Society, which considered urinary tract reconstruction in IBD. Methods:: Nominal group technique was used to derive consensus. Principal aspects of IBD assessment and surgery decision-making were agreed. A questionnaire was used to facilitate the generation of statements by a core focus group of experts, which were modified and ratified by the wider working group. This was followed by final voting by the full working group. Results:: General considerations included identifying the importance of the specialist IBD multi-disciplinary team. Peri-operative considerations recommended avoiding pre-operative fasting from midnight, and using an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Selection of bowel segment, pre-operative optimisation and post-operative issues were considered for both Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease. UC is not an absolute contraindication to urinary tract reconstruction using small or large bowel. Elective reconstructive surgery should wait at least three months following resolution of any acute UC flare-up to correct all abnormalities. Crohn’s disease is a high-risk disease for urinary tract reconstruction, even if in remission. In Crohn’s, reconstructive surgical options are limited by the location and extent of gastrointestinal segment(s) affected and the phenotype of disease. Conclusion:: The consensus opinion indicates that urinary tract reconstruction using bowel segments is feasible in carefully selected and optimised patients with IBD lacking alternative management options, provided there is access to appropriate multidisciplinary skills. UC is relatively low risk for surgical procedures, whereas Crohn’s has considerably increased risk of morbidity. The potential risks must be properly discussed with patients considering reconstructive urological procedures. Outcomes should be carefully monitored and published to identify the safety and efficacy of reconstructive surgery in IBD, including full description of the disease status.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T09:14:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9a9c237f3471404ea33a18db26e17c70
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2772-9737
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T09:14:01Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Continence
spelling doaj.art-9a9c237f3471404ea33a18db26e17c702022-12-21T20:28:08ZengElsevierContinence2772-97372022-03-011100018Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group reportN. Sihra0A. Williams1A. Emmanuel2N. Zarate Lopez3A. Sahai4R. Hamid5L. Neshatian6I. Paquette7G.A. Santoro8F.L. Heldwein9N. Thakare10A. Higazy11E. Aytac12L. Mansell13L. Thomas14M.J. Drake15R. Barratt16Department of Urology, Guy’s & St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKDepartment of Colourectal Surgery, Guy’s & St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKDepartment of Urology, Guy’s & St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKDepartment of Urology, University College Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, USADepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati OH, USADepartment of General and Colourectal Surgery, AULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, University of Padua, Treviso, ItalyDepartment of Urology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, BrazilDepartment of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, UKDepartment of Urology, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, EgyptDepartment of General Surgery, Acibadem University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of Pelvic Floor Physiotherapy, Governors State University, University Park, IL, USABristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UKBristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK; Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Corresponding author at: Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.Department of Urology, University College Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKIntroduction:: Potential consequences of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) need evaluation for patients considering urinary tract reconstruction for benign disease. A working group was formed by the International Continence Society, which considered urinary tract reconstruction in IBD. Methods:: Nominal group technique was used to derive consensus. Principal aspects of IBD assessment and surgery decision-making were agreed. A questionnaire was used to facilitate the generation of statements by a core focus group of experts, which were modified and ratified by the wider working group. This was followed by final voting by the full working group. Results:: General considerations included identifying the importance of the specialist IBD multi-disciplinary team. Peri-operative considerations recommended avoiding pre-operative fasting from midnight, and using an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Selection of bowel segment, pre-operative optimisation and post-operative issues were considered for both Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease. UC is not an absolute contraindication to urinary tract reconstruction using small or large bowel. Elective reconstructive surgery should wait at least three months following resolution of any acute UC flare-up to correct all abnormalities. Crohn’s disease is a high-risk disease for urinary tract reconstruction, even if in remission. In Crohn’s, reconstructive surgical options are limited by the location and extent of gastrointestinal segment(s) affected and the phenotype of disease. Conclusion:: The consensus opinion indicates that urinary tract reconstruction using bowel segments is feasible in carefully selected and optimised patients with IBD lacking alternative management options, provided there is access to appropriate multidisciplinary skills. UC is relatively low risk for surgical procedures, whereas Crohn’s has considerably increased risk of morbidity. The potential risks must be properly discussed with patients considering reconstructive urological procedures. Outcomes should be carefully monitored and published to identify the safety and efficacy of reconstructive surgery in IBD, including full description of the disease status.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973722000091Urinary tract reconstructionUrinary diversionCystectomyInflammatory bowel diseaseCrohn’s diseaseUlcerative colitis
spellingShingle N. Sihra
A. Williams
A. Emmanuel
N. Zarate Lopez
A. Sahai
R. Hamid
L. Neshatian
I. Paquette
G.A. Santoro
F.L. Heldwein
N. Thakare
A. Higazy
E. Aytac
L. Mansell
L. Thomas
M.J. Drake
R. Barratt
Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group report
Continence
Urinary tract reconstruction
Urinary diversion
Cystectomy
Inflammatory bowel disease
Crohn’s disease
Ulcerative colitis
title Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group report
title_full Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group report
title_fullStr Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group report
title_full_unstemmed Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group report
title_short Implications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease for reconstructive surgery in non-malignant urinary tract dysfunction: An International Continence Society working group report
title_sort implications of inflammatory bowel disease for reconstructive surgery in non malignant urinary tract dysfunction an international continence society working group report
topic Urinary tract reconstruction
Urinary diversion
Cystectomy
Inflammatory bowel disease
Crohn’s disease
Ulcerative colitis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973722000091
work_keys_str_mv AT nsihra implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT awilliams implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT aemmanuel implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT nzaratelopez implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT asahai implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT rhamid implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT lneshatian implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT ipaquette implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT gasantoro implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT flheldwein implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT nthakare implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT ahigazy implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT eaytac implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT lmansell implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT lthomas implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT mjdrake implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport
AT rbarratt implicationsofinflammatoryboweldiseaseforreconstructivesurgeryinnonmalignanturinarytractdysfunctionaninternationalcontinencesocietyworkinggroupreport