Evaluating vacant middle seats and masks as Coronavirus exposure reduction strategies in aircraft cabins using particle tracer experiments and computational fluid dynamics simulations

Abstract Aircraft cabins have high‐performance ventilation systems, yet typically hold many persons in close proximity for long durations. The current study estimated airborne virus exposure and infection reductions when middle seats are vacant compared to full occupancy and when passengers wear sur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James S. Bennett, Seif Mahmoud, Watts Dietrich, Byron Jones, Mohammad Hosni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-04-01
Series:Engineering Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12582
_version_ 1797854150954844160
author James S. Bennett
Seif Mahmoud
Watts Dietrich
Byron Jones
Mohammad Hosni
author_facet James S. Bennett
Seif Mahmoud
Watts Dietrich
Byron Jones
Mohammad Hosni
author_sort James S. Bennett
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aircraft cabins have high‐performance ventilation systems, yet typically hold many persons in close proximity for long durations. The current study estimated airborne virus exposure and infection reductions when middle seats are vacant compared to full occupancy and when passengers wear surgical masks in aircraft. Tracer particle data reported by U.S. Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) and CFD simulations reported by Boeing were used along with NIOSH data, to build nonlinear regression models with particle exposure and distance from particle source as variables. These models that estimate exposure at given distances from the viral source were applied to evaluate exposure reductions from vacant middle seats. Reductions averaged 54% for the seat row where an infectious passenger is located and 36% for a 24‐row cabin containing one infectious passenger, with middle seats vacant. Analysis of the TRANSCOM data showed that universal masking (surgical masks) reduced exposures by 62% and showed masking and physical distancing provide further reductions when practiced together. For a notional scenario involving 10 infectious passengers, compared with no intervention, masking, distancing, and both would prevent 6.2, 3.8, and 7.6 secondary infections, respectively, using the Wells–Riley equation. These results suggest distancing alone, masking alone, and these practiced together reduce SARS CoV‐2 exposure risk in increasing order of effectiveness, when an infectious passenger is present.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T20:02:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9a9cb63fa06446e0ad45b29199b0731f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2577-8196
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T20:02:15Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Engineering Reports
spelling doaj.art-9a9cb63fa06446e0ad45b29199b0731f2023-04-03T04:20:57ZengWileyEngineering Reports2577-81962023-04-0154n/an/a10.1002/eng2.12582Evaluating vacant middle seats and masks as Coronavirus exposure reduction strategies in aircraft cabins using particle tracer experiments and computational fluid dynamics simulationsJames S. Bennett0Seif Mahmoud1Watts Dietrich2Byron Jones3Mohammad Hosni4Division of Field Studies and Engineering National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC Cincinnati Ohio USADivision of Field Studies and Engineering National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC Cincinnati Ohio USADivision of Field Studies and Engineering National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC Cincinnati Ohio USADepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas USADepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas USAAbstract Aircraft cabins have high‐performance ventilation systems, yet typically hold many persons in close proximity for long durations. The current study estimated airborne virus exposure and infection reductions when middle seats are vacant compared to full occupancy and when passengers wear surgical masks in aircraft. Tracer particle data reported by U.S. Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) and CFD simulations reported by Boeing were used along with NIOSH data, to build nonlinear regression models with particle exposure and distance from particle source as variables. These models that estimate exposure at given distances from the viral source were applied to evaluate exposure reductions from vacant middle seats. Reductions averaged 54% for the seat row where an infectious passenger is located and 36% for a 24‐row cabin containing one infectious passenger, with middle seats vacant. Analysis of the TRANSCOM data showed that universal masking (surgical masks) reduced exposures by 62% and showed masking and physical distancing provide further reductions when practiced together. For a notional scenario involving 10 infectious passengers, compared with no intervention, masking, distancing, and both would prevent 6.2, 3.8, and 7.6 secondary infections, respectively, using the Wells–Riley equation. These results suggest distancing alone, masking alone, and these practiced together reduce SARS CoV‐2 exposure risk in increasing order of effectiveness, when an infectious passenger is present.https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12582aircraft cabinCOVID‐19mask wearingMS2 virustracer particlesvacant middle seat
spellingShingle James S. Bennett
Seif Mahmoud
Watts Dietrich
Byron Jones
Mohammad Hosni
Evaluating vacant middle seats and masks as Coronavirus exposure reduction strategies in aircraft cabins using particle tracer experiments and computational fluid dynamics simulations
Engineering Reports
aircraft cabin
COVID‐19
mask wearing
MS2 virus
tracer particles
vacant middle seat
title Evaluating vacant middle seats and masks as Coronavirus exposure reduction strategies in aircraft cabins using particle tracer experiments and computational fluid dynamics simulations
title_full Evaluating vacant middle seats and masks as Coronavirus exposure reduction strategies in aircraft cabins using particle tracer experiments and computational fluid dynamics simulations
title_fullStr Evaluating vacant middle seats and masks as Coronavirus exposure reduction strategies in aircraft cabins using particle tracer experiments and computational fluid dynamics simulations
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating vacant middle seats and masks as Coronavirus exposure reduction strategies in aircraft cabins using particle tracer experiments and computational fluid dynamics simulations
title_short Evaluating vacant middle seats and masks as Coronavirus exposure reduction strategies in aircraft cabins using particle tracer experiments and computational fluid dynamics simulations
title_sort evaluating vacant middle seats and masks as coronavirus exposure reduction strategies in aircraft cabins using particle tracer experiments and computational fluid dynamics simulations
topic aircraft cabin
COVID‐19
mask wearing
MS2 virus
tracer particles
vacant middle seat
url https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12582
work_keys_str_mv AT jamessbennett evaluatingvacantmiddleseatsandmasksascoronavirusexposurereductionstrategiesinaircraftcabinsusingparticletracerexperimentsandcomputationalfluiddynamicssimulations
AT seifmahmoud evaluatingvacantmiddleseatsandmasksascoronavirusexposurereductionstrategiesinaircraftcabinsusingparticletracerexperimentsandcomputationalfluiddynamicssimulations
AT wattsdietrich evaluatingvacantmiddleseatsandmasksascoronavirusexposurereductionstrategiesinaircraftcabinsusingparticletracerexperimentsandcomputationalfluiddynamicssimulations
AT byronjones evaluatingvacantmiddleseatsandmasksascoronavirusexposurereductionstrategiesinaircraftcabinsusingparticletracerexperimentsandcomputationalfluiddynamicssimulations
AT mohammadhosni evaluatingvacantmiddleseatsandmasksascoronavirusexposurereductionstrategiesinaircraftcabinsusingparticletracerexperimentsandcomputationalfluiddynamicssimulations