Optimal tree architecture for high‐yield yellowhorn (Xanthoceras sorbifolium) management

Abstract Tree architectural attributes demonstrate a significant association with fruit yield. Yellowhorn is the future bioenergy tree in China; however, the species suffers from high reproductive energy and exceedingly low reproductive output. To optimize yellowhorn management and pinpoint priority...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xinrui Wang, Qing Wang, Qiang Jia, Yousry A. El‐Kassaby, Sailesh Ranjitkar, Junjie Wang, Qiuhong Xiang, Kurt vonKleist, Wenbin Guan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-09-01
Series:Food and Energy Security
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.500
_version_ 1797680952903729152
author Xinrui Wang
Qing Wang
Qiang Jia
Yousry A. El‐Kassaby
Sailesh Ranjitkar
Junjie Wang
Qiuhong Xiang
Kurt vonKleist
Wenbin Guan
author_facet Xinrui Wang
Qing Wang
Qiang Jia
Yousry A. El‐Kassaby
Sailesh Ranjitkar
Junjie Wang
Qiuhong Xiang
Kurt vonKleist
Wenbin Guan
author_sort Xinrui Wang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Tree architectural attributes demonstrate a significant association with fruit yield. Yellowhorn is the future bioenergy tree in China; however, the species suffers from high reproductive energy and exceedingly low reproductive output. To optimize yellowhorn management and pinpoint priority trees featuring optimal architecture, we employed machine learning modeling to develop high fruit yielding predictive models using five yield indicators (dependent variables: FrW, SeW, ShW, FrW, and SeN) and five tree characteristics (independent variables: CA, TH, DGL, HLC, and MBN) of yellowhorn. Results showed that trees characterized by a substantial canopy area (>1.70 m2) and a large diameter at ground level (>3.71 cm) have been found to yield a higher fruit production. However, increased tree height does not invariably correlate with an elevated yield. Effective selection of high‐yielding individuals can be accomplished by restricting tree height within the range of 192–232.4 cm. This approach emphasizes the importance of integrating considerations of tree architecture into forestry management practices. Such integration can bolster productivity, thereby contributing to both the sustainability and economic viability of yellowhorn forests.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T23:38:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9aa5fb8f2c304e53a342399c920e5feb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2048-3694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T23:38:13Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Food and Energy Security
spelling doaj.art-9aa5fb8f2c304e53a342399c920e5feb2023-09-19T18:45:42ZengWileyFood and Energy Security2048-36942023-09-01125n/an/a10.1002/fes3.500Optimal tree architecture for high‐yield yellowhorn (Xanthoceras sorbifolium) managementXinrui Wang0Qing Wang1Qiang Jia2Yousry A. El‐Kassaby3Sailesh Ranjitkar4Junjie Wang5Qiuhong Xiang6Kurt vonKleist7Wenbin Guan8School of Ecology and Nature Conservation Beijing Forestry University Beijing ChinaEcological Technical Research Institute (Beijing)CO., Ltd., CIECC Beijing ChinaEcological Technical Research Institute (Beijing)CO., Ltd., CIECC Beijing ChinaDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry The University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia CanadaWorld Agroforestry Centre, East and Central Asia Kunming ChinaEcological Technical Research Institute (Beijing)CO., Ltd., CIECC Beijing ChinaSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation Beijing Forestry University Beijing ChinaTropical Forests and People Research Centre University of the Sunshine Coast Sippy Downs Queensland AustraliaSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation Beijing Forestry University Beijing ChinaAbstract Tree architectural attributes demonstrate a significant association with fruit yield. Yellowhorn is the future bioenergy tree in China; however, the species suffers from high reproductive energy and exceedingly low reproductive output. To optimize yellowhorn management and pinpoint priority trees featuring optimal architecture, we employed machine learning modeling to develop high fruit yielding predictive models using five yield indicators (dependent variables: FrW, SeW, ShW, FrW, and SeN) and five tree characteristics (independent variables: CA, TH, DGL, HLC, and MBN) of yellowhorn. Results showed that trees characterized by a substantial canopy area (>1.70 m2) and a large diameter at ground level (>3.71 cm) have been found to yield a higher fruit production. However, increased tree height does not invariably correlate with an elevated yield. Effective selection of high‐yielding individuals can be accomplished by restricting tree height within the range of 192–232.4 cm. This approach emphasizes the importance of integrating considerations of tree architecture into forestry management practices. Such integration can bolster productivity, thereby contributing to both the sustainability and economic viability of yellowhorn forests.https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.500fruit traithigh yieldtree architectureWoody oil speciesYellowhorn
spellingShingle Xinrui Wang
Qing Wang
Qiang Jia
Yousry A. El‐Kassaby
Sailesh Ranjitkar
Junjie Wang
Qiuhong Xiang
Kurt vonKleist
Wenbin Guan
Optimal tree architecture for high‐yield yellowhorn (Xanthoceras sorbifolium) management
Food and Energy Security
fruit trait
high yield
tree architecture
Woody oil species
Yellowhorn
title Optimal tree architecture for high‐yield yellowhorn (Xanthoceras sorbifolium) management
title_full Optimal tree architecture for high‐yield yellowhorn (Xanthoceras sorbifolium) management
title_fullStr Optimal tree architecture for high‐yield yellowhorn (Xanthoceras sorbifolium) management
title_full_unstemmed Optimal tree architecture for high‐yield yellowhorn (Xanthoceras sorbifolium) management
title_short Optimal tree architecture for high‐yield yellowhorn (Xanthoceras sorbifolium) management
title_sort optimal tree architecture for high yield yellowhorn xanthoceras sorbifolium management
topic fruit trait
high yield
tree architecture
Woody oil species
Yellowhorn
url https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.500
work_keys_str_mv AT xinruiwang optimaltreearchitectureforhighyieldyellowhornxanthocerassorbifoliummanagement
AT qingwang optimaltreearchitectureforhighyieldyellowhornxanthocerassorbifoliummanagement
AT qiangjia optimaltreearchitectureforhighyieldyellowhornxanthocerassorbifoliummanagement
AT yousryaelkassaby optimaltreearchitectureforhighyieldyellowhornxanthocerassorbifoliummanagement
AT saileshranjitkar optimaltreearchitectureforhighyieldyellowhornxanthocerassorbifoliummanagement
AT junjiewang optimaltreearchitectureforhighyieldyellowhornxanthocerassorbifoliummanagement
AT qiuhongxiang optimaltreearchitectureforhighyieldyellowhornxanthocerassorbifoliummanagement
AT kurtvonkleist optimaltreearchitectureforhighyieldyellowhornxanthocerassorbifoliummanagement
AT wenbinguan optimaltreearchitectureforhighyieldyellowhornxanthocerassorbifoliummanagement