Living with frailty and haemodialysis: a qualitative study

Abstract Background Frailty is highly prevalent in people receiving haemodialysis (HD) and is associated with poor outcomes. Understanding the lived experiences of this group is essential to inform holistic care delivery. Methods Semi-structured interviews with N = 25 prevalent adults receiving HD f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hannah M. L. Young, Nicki Ruddock, Mary Harrison, Samantha Goodliffe, Courtney J. Lightfoot, Juliette Mayes, Andrew C. Nixon, Sharlene A. Greenwood, Simon Conroy, Sally J. Singh, James O. Burton, Alice C. Smith, Helen Eborall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-07-01
Series:BMC Nephrology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02857-w
_version_ 1828259684970135552
author Hannah M. L. Young
Nicki Ruddock
Mary Harrison
Samantha Goodliffe
Courtney J. Lightfoot
Juliette Mayes
Andrew C. Nixon
Sharlene A. Greenwood
Simon Conroy
Sally J. Singh
James O. Burton
Alice C. Smith
Helen Eborall
author_facet Hannah M. L. Young
Nicki Ruddock
Mary Harrison
Samantha Goodliffe
Courtney J. Lightfoot
Juliette Mayes
Andrew C. Nixon
Sharlene A. Greenwood
Simon Conroy
Sally J. Singh
James O. Burton
Alice C. Smith
Helen Eborall
author_sort Hannah M. L. Young
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Frailty is highly prevalent in people receiving haemodialysis (HD) and is associated with poor outcomes. Understanding the lived experiences of this group is essential to inform holistic care delivery. Methods Semi-structured interviews with N = 25 prevalent adults receiving HD from 3 HD units in the UK. Eligibility criteria included a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score of 4–7 and a history of at least one fall in the last 6 months. Sampling began guided by maximum variation sampling to ensure diversity in frailty status; subsequently theoretical sampling enabled exploration of preliminary themes. Analysis was informed by constructivist grounded theory; later we drew upon the socioecological model. Results Participants had a mean age of 69 ± 10 years, 13 were female, and 13 were White British. 14 participants were vulnerable or mildly frail (CFS 4–5), and 11 moderately or severely frail (CFS 6–7). Participants characterised frailty as weight loss, weakness, exhaustion, pain and sleep disturbance arising from multiple long-term conditions. Participants’ accounts revealed: the consequences of frailty (variable function and psychological ill-health at the individual level; increasing reliance upon family at the interpersonal level; burdensome health and social care interactions at the organisational level; reduced participation at the community level; challenges with financial support at the societal level); coping strategies (avoidance, vigilance, and resignation); and unmet needs (overprotection from family and healthcare professionals, transactional health and social care exchanges). Conclusions The implementation of a holistic needs assessment, person-centred health and social care systems, greater family support and enhancing opportunities for community participation may all improve outcomes and experience. An approach which encompasses all these strategies, together with wider public health interventions, may have a greater sustained impact. Trial registration ISRCTN12840463 .
first_indexed 2024-04-13T03:12:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9aa796979ba440f9a8ab47f85e73455f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2369
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T03:12:14Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Nephrology
spelling doaj.art-9aa796979ba440f9a8ab47f85e73455f2022-12-22T03:05:00ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692022-07-0123111210.1186/s12882-022-02857-wLiving with frailty and haemodialysis: a qualitative studyHannah M. L. Young0Nicki Ruddock1Mary Harrison2Samantha Goodliffe3Courtney J. Lightfoot4Juliette Mayes5Andrew C. Nixon6Sharlene A. Greenwood7Simon Conroy8Sally J. Singh9James O. Burton10Alice C. Smith11Helen Eborall12Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustJohn Walls Renal Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustLeicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustSchool of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, The Open UniversityDepartment of Health Sciences, University of LeicesterDepartment of Physiotherapy and Renal Medicine, King’s College Hospital and Department of Renal Medicine, King’s College LondonDepartment of Renal Medicine, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of Physiotherapy and Renal Medicine, King’s College Hospital and Department of Renal Medicine, King’s College LondonCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust - MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College LondonCentre for Exercise & Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research CentreDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of LeicesterDepartment of Health Sciences, University of LeicesterUsher Institute, University of EdinburghAbstract Background Frailty is highly prevalent in people receiving haemodialysis (HD) and is associated with poor outcomes. Understanding the lived experiences of this group is essential to inform holistic care delivery. Methods Semi-structured interviews with N = 25 prevalent adults receiving HD from 3 HD units in the UK. Eligibility criteria included a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score of 4–7 and a history of at least one fall in the last 6 months. Sampling began guided by maximum variation sampling to ensure diversity in frailty status; subsequently theoretical sampling enabled exploration of preliminary themes. Analysis was informed by constructivist grounded theory; later we drew upon the socioecological model. Results Participants had a mean age of 69 ± 10 years, 13 were female, and 13 were White British. 14 participants were vulnerable or mildly frail (CFS 4–5), and 11 moderately or severely frail (CFS 6–7). Participants characterised frailty as weight loss, weakness, exhaustion, pain and sleep disturbance arising from multiple long-term conditions. Participants’ accounts revealed: the consequences of frailty (variable function and psychological ill-health at the individual level; increasing reliance upon family at the interpersonal level; burdensome health and social care interactions at the organisational level; reduced participation at the community level; challenges with financial support at the societal level); coping strategies (avoidance, vigilance, and resignation); and unmet needs (overprotection from family and healthcare professionals, transactional health and social care exchanges). Conclusions The implementation of a holistic needs assessment, person-centred health and social care systems, greater family support and enhancing opportunities for community participation may all improve outcomes and experience. An approach which encompasses all these strategies, together with wider public health interventions, may have a greater sustained impact. Trial registration ISRCTN12840463 .https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02857-wHaemodialysisFrailtyDialysisMulti-morbidityQualitativeInterviews
spellingShingle Hannah M. L. Young
Nicki Ruddock
Mary Harrison
Samantha Goodliffe
Courtney J. Lightfoot
Juliette Mayes
Andrew C. Nixon
Sharlene A. Greenwood
Simon Conroy
Sally J. Singh
James O. Burton
Alice C. Smith
Helen Eborall
Living with frailty and haemodialysis: a qualitative study
BMC Nephrology
Haemodialysis
Frailty
Dialysis
Multi-morbidity
Qualitative
Interviews
title Living with frailty and haemodialysis: a qualitative study
title_full Living with frailty and haemodialysis: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Living with frailty and haemodialysis: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Living with frailty and haemodialysis: a qualitative study
title_short Living with frailty and haemodialysis: a qualitative study
title_sort living with frailty and haemodialysis a qualitative study
topic Haemodialysis
Frailty
Dialysis
Multi-morbidity
Qualitative
Interviews
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02857-w
work_keys_str_mv AT hannahmlyoung livingwithfrailtyandhaemodialysisaqualitativestudy
AT nickiruddock livingwithfrailtyandhaemodialysisaqualitativestudy
AT maryharrison livingwithfrailtyandhaemodialysisaqualitativestudy
AT samanthagoodliffe livingwithfrailtyandhaemodialysisaqualitativestudy
AT courtneyjlightfoot livingwithfrailtyandhaemodialysisaqualitativestudy
AT juliettemayes livingwithfrailtyandhaemodialysisaqualitativestudy
AT andrewcnixon livingwithfrailtyandhaemodialysisaqualitativestudy
AT sharleneagreenwood livingwithfrailtyandhaemodialysisaqualitativestudy
AT simonconroy livingwithfrailtyandhaemodialysisaqualitativestudy
AT sallyjsingh livingwithfrailtyandhaemodialysisaqualitativestudy
AT jamesoburton livingwithfrailtyandhaemodialysisaqualitativestudy
AT alicecsmith livingwithfrailtyandhaemodialysisaqualitativestudy
AT heleneborall livingwithfrailtyandhaemodialysisaqualitativestudy