Amide Proton Transfer Weighted and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Rectal Adenocarcinoma

ObjectivesTo analyze the value of amide proton transfer (APT) weighted and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging in evaluation of prognostic factors for rectal adenocarcinoma, compared with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI).Materials and MethodsPreoperative pelvic MRI data of 110 patients with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juan Li, Liangjie Lin, Xuemei Gao, Shenglei Li, Jingliang Cheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.783544/full
_version_ 1819099063924031488
author Juan Li
Liangjie Lin
Xuemei Gao
Shenglei Li
Jingliang Cheng
author_facet Juan Li
Liangjie Lin
Xuemei Gao
Shenglei Li
Jingliang Cheng
author_sort Juan Li
collection DOAJ
description ObjectivesTo analyze the value of amide proton transfer (APT) weighted and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging in evaluation of prognostic factors for rectal adenocarcinoma, compared with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI).Materials and MethodsPreoperative pelvic MRI data of 110 patients with surgical pathologically confirmed diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent high-resolution T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), APT, IVIM, and DWI. Parameters including APT signal intensity (APT SI), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured in different histopathologic types, grades, stages, and structure invasion statuses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy, and the corresponding area under the curves (AUCs) were calculated.ResultsAPT SI, D and ADC values of rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC) were significantly higher than those of rectal common adenocarcinoma (AC) ([3.192 ± 0.661%] vs. [2.333 ± 0.471%], [1.153 ± 0.238×10-3 mm2/s] vs. [0.792 ± 0.173×10-3 mm2/s], and [1.535 ± 0.203×10-3 mm2/s] vs. [0.986 ± 0.124×10-3 mm2/s], respectively; all P<0.001). In AC group, the APT SI and D values showed significant differences between low- and high-grade tumors ([2.226 ± 0.347%] vs. [2.668 ± 0.638%], and [0.842 ± 0.148×10-3 mm2/s] vs. [0.777 ± 0.178×10-3 mm2/s], respectively, both P<0.05). The D value had significant difference between positive and negative extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) tumors ([0.771 ± 0.175×10-3 mm2/s] vs. [0.858 ± 0.151×10-3 mm2/s], P<0.05). No significant difference of APT SI, D, D*, f or ADC was observed in different T stages, N stages, perineural and lymphovascular invasions (all P>0.05). The ROC curves showed that the AUCs of APT SI, D and ADC values for distinguishing MC from AC were 0.921, 0.893 and 0.995, respectively. The AUCs of APT SI and D values in distinguishing low- from high-grade AC were 0.737 and 0.663, respectively. The AUC of the D value for evaluating EMVI involvement was 0.646.ConclusionAPT and IVIM were helpful to assess the prognostic factors related to rectal adenocarcinoma, including histopathological type, tumor grade and the EMVI status.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T00:40:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9aa971eefd664309a6d475c0877cad9a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T00:40:56Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-9aa971eefd664309a6d475c0877cad9a2022-12-21T18:44:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2022-01-011110.3389/fonc.2021.783544783544Amide Proton Transfer Weighted and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Rectal AdenocarcinomaJuan Li0Liangjie Lin1Xuemei Gao2Shenglei Li3Jingliang Cheng4Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaAdvanced Technical Support, Philips Healthcare, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaObjectivesTo analyze the value of amide proton transfer (APT) weighted and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging in evaluation of prognostic factors for rectal adenocarcinoma, compared with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI).Materials and MethodsPreoperative pelvic MRI data of 110 patients with surgical pathologically confirmed diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent high-resolution T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), APT, IVIM, and DWI. Parameters including APT signal intensity (APT SI), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured in different histopathologic types, grades, stages, and structure invasion statuses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy, and the corresponding area under the curves (AUCs) were calculated.ResultsAPT SI, D and ADC values of rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC) were significantly higher than those of rectal common adenocarcinoma (AC) ([3.192 ± 0.661%] vs. [2.333 ± 0.471%], [1.153 ± 0.238×10-3 mm2/s] vs. [0.792 ± 0.173×10-3 mm2/s], and [1.535 ± 0.203×10-3 mm2/s] vs. [0.986 ± 0.124×10-3 mm2/s], respectively; all P<0.001). In AC group, the APT SI and D values showed significant differences between low- and high-grade tumors ([2.226 ± 0.347%] vs. [2.668 ± 0.638%], and [0.842 ± 0.148×10-3 mm2/s] vs. [0.777 ± 0.178×10-3 mm2/s], respectively, both P<0.05). The D value had significant difference between positive and negative extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) tumors ([0.771 ± 0.175×10-3 mm2/s] vs. [0.858 ± 0.151×10-3 mm2/s], P<0.05). No significant difference of APT SI, D, D*, f or ADC was observed in different T stages, N stages, perineural and lymphovascular invasions (all P>0.05). The ROC curves showed that the AUCs of APT SI, D and ADC values for distinguishing MC from AC were 0.921, 0.893 and 0.995, respectively. The AUCs of APT SI and D values in distinguishing low- from high-grade AC were 0.737 and 0.663, respectively. The AUC of the D value for evaluating EMVI involvement was 0.646.ConclusionAPT and IVIM were helpful to assess the prognostic factors related to rectal adenocarcinoma, including histopathological type, tumor grade and the EMVI status.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.783544/fullAPTIVIMrectal neoplasmsadenocarcinomamagnetic resonance imaging
spellingShingle Juan Li
Liangjie Lin
Xuemei Gao
Shenglei Li
Jingliang Cheng
Amide Proton Transfer Weighted and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Rectal Adenocarcinoma
Frontiers in Oncology
APT
IVIM
rectal neoplasms
adenocarcinoma
magnetic resonance imaging
title Amide Proton Transfer Weighted and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Rectal Adenocarcinoma
title_full Amide Proton Transfer Weighted and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Rectal Adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Amide Proton Transfer Weighted and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Rectal Adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Amide Proton Transfer Weighted and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Rectal Adenocarcinoma
title_short Amide Proton Transfer Weighted and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Rectal Adenocarcinoma
title_sort amide proton transfer weighted and intravoxel incoherent motion imaging in evaluation of prognostic factors for rectal adenocarcinoma
topic APT
IVIM
rectal neoplasms
adenocarcinoma
magnetic resonance imaging
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.783544/full
work_keys_str_mv AT juanli amideprotontransferweightedandintravoxelincoherentmotionimaginginevaluationofprognosticfactorsforrectaladenocarcinoma
AT liangjielin amideprotontransferweightedandintravoxelincoherentmotionimaginginevaluationofprognosticfactorsforrectaladenocarcinoma
AT xuemeigao amideprotontransferweightedandintravoxelincoherentmotionimaginginevaluationofprognosticfactorsforrectaladenocarcinoma
AT shengleili amideprotontransferweightedandintravoxelincoherentmotionimaginginevaluationofprognosticfactorsforrectaladenocarcinoma
AT jingliangcheng amideprotontransferweightedandintravoxelincoherentmotionimaginginevaluationofprognosticfactorsforrectaladenocarcinoma