Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters

Abstract Background Stepped wedge trials are an appealing and potentially powerful cluster randomized trial design. However, they are frequently implemented with a small number of clusters. Standard analysis methods for these trials such as a linear mixed model with estimation via maximum likelihood...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kelsey L. Grantham, Jessica Kasza, Stephane Heritier, John B. Carlin, Andrew B. Forbes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-04-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01550-8
_version_ 1828405471673843712
author Kelsey L. Grantham
Jessica Kasza
Stephane Heritier
John B. Carlin
Andrew B. Forbes
author_facet Kelsey L. Grantham
Jessica Kasza
Stephane Heritier
John B. Carlin
Andrew B. Forbes
author_sort Kelsey L. Grantham
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Stepped wedge trials are an appealing and potentially powerful cluster randomized trial design. However, they are frequently implemented with a small number of clusters. Standard analysis methods for these trials such as a linear mixed model with estimation via maximum likelihood or restricted maximum likelihood (REML) rely on asymptotic properties and have been shown to yield inflated type I error when applied to studies with a small number of clusters. Small-sample methods such as the Kenward-Roger approximation in combination with REML can potentially improve estimation of the fixed effects such as the treatment effect. A Bayesian approach may also be promising for such multilevel models but has not yet seen much application in cluster randomized trials. Methods We conducted a simulation study comparing the performance of REML with and without a Kenward-Roger approximation to a Bayesian approach using weakly informative prior distributions on the intracluster correlation parameters. We considered a continuous outcome and a range of stepped wedge trial configurations with between 4 and 40 clusters. To assess method performance we calculated bias and mean squared error for the treatment effect and correlation parameters and the coverage of 95% confidence/credible intervals and relative percent error in model-based standard error for the treatment effect. Results Both REML with a Kenward-Roger standard error and degrees of freedom correction and the Bayesian method performed similarly well for the estimation of the treatment effect, while intracluster correlation parameter estimates obtained via the Bayesian method were less variable than REML estimates with different relative levels of bias. Conclusions The use of REML with a Kenward-Roger approximation may be sufficient for the analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters. However, a Bayesian approach with weakly informative prior distributions on the intracluster correlation parameters offers a viable alternative, particularly when there is interest in the probability-based inferences permitted within this paradigm.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T10:53:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9aafa8b91ba44d3abcb9969d7c5019dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2288
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T10:53:54Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj.art-9aafa8b91ba44d3abcb9969d7c5019dd2022-12-22T01:51:56ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882022-04-0122111810.1186/s12874-022-01550-8Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clustersKelsey L. Grantham0Jessica Kasza1Stephane Heritier2John B. Carlin3Andrew B. Forbes4School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash UniversitySchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash UniversitySchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash UniversityClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children’s Research InstituteSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash UniversityAbstract Background Stepped wedge trials are an appealing and potentially powerful cluster randomized trial design. However, they are frequently implemented with a small number of clusters. Standard analysis methods for these trials such as a linear mixed model with estimation via maximum likelihood or restricted maximum likelihood (REML) rely on asymptotic properties and have been shown to yield inflated type I error when applied to studies with a small number of clusters. Small-sample methods such as the Kenward-Roger approximation in combination with REML can potentially improve estimation of the fixed effects such as the treatment effect. A Bayesian approach may also be promising for such multilevel models but has not yet seen much application in cluster randomized trials. Methods We conducted a simulation study comparing the performance of REML with and without a Kenward-Roger approximation to a Bayesian approach using weakly informative prior distributions on the intracluster correlation parameters. We considered a continuous outcome and a range of stepped wedge trial configurations with between 4 and 40 clusters. To assess method performance we calculated bias and mean squared error for the treatment effect and correlation parameters and the coverage of 95% confidence/credible intervals and relative percent error in model-based standard error for the treatment effect. Results Both REML with a Kenward-Roger standard error and degrees of freedom correction and the Bayesian method performed similarly well for the estimation of the treatment effect, while intracluster correlation parameter estimates obtained via the Bayesian method were less variable than REML estimates with different relative levels of bias. Conclusions The use of REML with a Kenward-Roger approximation may be sufficient for the analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters. However, a Bayesian approach with weakly informative prior distributions on the intracluster correlation parameters offers a viable alternative, particularly when there is interest in the probability-based inferences permitted within this paradigm.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01550-8Bayesian inferenceCluster randomized trialIntracluster correlationRestricted maximum likelihoodSimulation studyStepped wedge
spellingShingle Kelsey L. Grantham
Jessica Kasza
Stephane Heritier
John B. Carlin
Andrew B. Forbes
Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Bayesian inference
Cluster randomized trial
Intracluster correlation
Restricted maximum likelihood
Simulation study
Stepped wedge
title Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters
title_full Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters
title_fullStr Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters
title_short Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters
title_sort evaluating the performance of bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters
topic Bayesian inference
Cluster randomized trial
Intracluster correlation
Restricted maximum likelihood
Simulation study
Stepped wedge
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01550-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kelseylgrantham evaluatingtheperformanceofbayesianandrestrictedmaximumlikelihoodestimationforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialswithasmallnumberofclusters
AT jessicakasza evaluatingtheperformanceofbayesianandrestrictedmaximumlikelihoodestimationforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialswithasmallnumberofclusters
AT stephaneheritier evaluatingtheperformanceofbayesianandrestrictedmaximumlikelihoodestimationforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialswithasmallnumberofclusters
AT johnbcarlin evaluatingtheperformanceofbayesianandrestrictedmaximumlikelihoodestimationforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialswithasmallnumberofclusters
AT andrewbforbes evaluatingtheperformanceofbayesianandrestrictedmaximumlikelihoodestimationforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialswithasmallnumberofclusters