Is Routine Gastroscopy/Colonoscopy Reasonable in Patients With Suspected Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of routine preoperative gastroscopy/colonoscopy in patients with suspected ovarian cancer for differential diagnosis and judgment of bowel resection.MethodsAll women diagnosed with suspected ovarian cancer who underwent gastroscopy/colonoscopy before surgery in our cen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guochen Liu, Junping Yan, Shanshan Long, Zhimin Liu, Haifeng Gu, Hua Tu, Jundong Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.608999/full
_version_ 1818602638788263936
author Guochen Liu
Junping Yan
Shanshan Long
Zhimin Liu
Haifeng Gu
Hua Tu
Jundong Li
author_facet Guochen Liu
Junping Yan
Shanshan Long
Zhimin Liu
Haifeng Gu
Hua Tu
Jundong Li
author_sort Guochen Liu
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of routine preoperative gastroscopy/colonoscopy in patients with suspected ovarian cancer for differential diagnosis and judgment of bowel resection.MethodsAll women diagnosed with suspected ovarian cancer who underwent gastroscopy/colonoscopy before surgery in our center were retrospectively identified. Gastroscopy/colonoscopy results and clinical pathology, imaging, and surgical findings were analyzed.Results389 patients were included. Among them, 40 (including 13 gastric and 9 colonic malignancy) were ovarian metastasis. Compared with imaging, gastrointestinal endoscopy showed no statistical advantage in the specificity and sensitivity (99.4% vs. 99.7%, P=1.0; 55.0% vs. 45.2%, P=0.057; respectively). All patients with gastric/colonic cancer metastasize except for one had indicative imaging or tumor marker abnormalities. Three patients with colonic cancer metastases underwent optimal surgery and alive with no recurrence, the other 19 patients experienced palliative chemotherapy. There is no significant difference in the sensitivity of colonoscopy and imaging in predicting intestinal incision (61.5% vs. 43.8%, P=0.804), whereas the latter had higher specificity (87.8% vs. 74.3%, P=0.001).ConclusionsFor patients with suspected ovarian cancer, the incidence of gastrointestinal metastases is low, routine gastroscopy/colonoscopy before treatment is less efficient. Gastroscopy/colonoscopy has limited power to predict the need for gastrointestinal resection before ovarian cancer surgery.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T13:10:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9ab2603ef59d42fabe234893dbb349e0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T13:10:28Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-9ab2603ef59d42fabe234893dbb349e02022-12-21T22:30:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2021-07-011110.3389/fonc.2021.608999608999Is Routine Gastroscopy/Colonoscopy Reasonable in Patients With Suspected Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective StudyGuochen Liu0Junping Yan1Shanshan Long2Zhimin Liu3Haifeng Gu4Hua Tu5Jundong Li6Department of Gynecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, ChinaObjectiveTo evaluate the value of routine preoperative gastroscopy/colonoscopy in patients with suspected ovarian cancer for differential diagnosis and judgment of bowel resection.MethodsAll women diagnosed with suspected ovarian cancer who underwent gastroscopy/colonoscopy before surgery in our center were retrospectively identified. Gastroscopy/colonoscopy results and clinical pathology, imaging, and surgical findings were analyzed.Results389 patients were included. Among them, 40 (including 13 gastric and 9 colonic malignancy) were ovarian metastasis. Compared with imaging, gastrointestinal endoscopy showed no statistical advantage in the specificity and sensitivity (99.4% vs. 99.7%, P=1.0; 55.0% vs. 45.2%, P=0.057; respectively). All patients with gastric/colonic cancer metastasize except for one had indicative imaging or tumor marker abnormalities. Three patients with colonic cancer metastases underwent optimal surgery and alive with no recurrence, the other 19 patients experienced palliative chemotherapy. There is no significant difference in the sensitivity of colonoscopy and imaging in predicting intestinal incision (61.5% vs. 43.8%, P=0.804), whereas the latter had higher specificity (87.8% vs. 74.3%, P=0.001).ConclusionsFor patients with suspected ovarian cancer, the incidence of gastrointestinal metastases is low, routine gastroscopy/colonoscopy before treatment is less efficient. Gastroscopy/colonoscopy has limited power to predict the need for gastrointestinal resection before ovarian cancer surgery.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.608999/fullovarian cancergastroscopycolonoscopyovarian metastasisdifferential diagnosis
spellingShingle Guochen Liu
Junping Yan
Shanshan Long
Zhimin Liu
Haifeng Gu
Hua Tu
Jundong Li
Is Routine Gastroscopy/Colonoscopy Reasonable in Patients With Suspected Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Study
Frontiers in Oncology
ovarian cancer
gastroscopy
colonoscopy
ovarian metastasis
differential diagnosis
title Is Routine Gastroscopy/Colonoscopy Reasonable in Patients With Suspected Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Study
title_full Is Routine Gastroscopy/Colonoscopy Reasonable in Patients With Suspected Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Is Routine Gastroscopy/Colonoscopy Reasonable in Patients With Suspected Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Is Routine Gastroscopy/Colonoscopy Reasonable in Patients With Suspected Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Study
title_short Is Routine Gastroscopy/Colonoscopy Reasonable in Patients With Suspected Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Study
title_sort is routine gastroscopy colonoscopy reasonable in patients with suspected ovarian cancer a retrospective study
topic ovarian cancer
gastroscopy
colonoscopy
ovarian metastasis
differential diagnosis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.608999/full
work_keys_str_mv AT guochenliu isroutinegastroscopycolonoscopyreasonableinpatientswithsuspectedovariancanceraretrospectivestudy
AT junpingyan isroutinegastroscopycolonoscopyreasonableinpatientswithsuspectedovariancanceraretrospectivestudy
AT shanshanlong isroutinegastroscopycolonoscopyreasonableinpatientswithsuspectedovariancanceraretrospectivestudy
AT zhiminliu isroutinegastroscopycolonoscopyreasonableinpatientswithsuspectedovariancanceraretrospectivestudy
AT haifenggu isroutinegastroscopycolonoscopyreasonableinpatientswithsuspectedovariancanceraretrospectivestudy
AT huatu isroutinegastroscopycolonoscopyreasonableinpatientswithsuspectedovariancanceraretrospectivestudy
AT jundongli isroutinegastroscopycolonoscopyreasonableinpatientswithsuspectedovariancanceraretrospectivestudy