Comparison of Two Energy Management Strategies Considering Power System Durability for PEMFC-LIB Hybrid Logistics Vehicle

For commercial applications, the durability and economy of the fuel cell hybrid system have become obstacles to be overcome, which are not only affected by the performance of core materials and components, but also closely related to the energy management strategy (EMS). This paper takes the 7.9 t f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jianying Liang, Yankun Li, Wenya Jia, Weikang Lin, Tiancai Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3262
_version_ 1797531597137772544
author Jianying Liang
Yankun Li
Wenya Jia
Weikang Lin
Tiancai Ma
author_facet Jianying Liang
Yankun Li
Wenya Jia
Weikang Lin
Tiancai Ma
author_sort Jianying Liang
collection DOAJ
description For commercial applications, the durability and economy of the fuel cell hybrid system have become obstacles to be overcome, which are not only affected by the performance of core materials and components, but also closely related to the energy management strategy (EMS). This paper takes the 7.9 t fuel cell logistics vehicle as the research object, and designed the EMS from two levels of qualitative and quantitative analysis, which are the composite fuzzy control strategy optimized by genetic algorithm and Pontryagin’s minimum principle (PMP) optimized by objective function, respectively. The cost function was constructed and used as the optimization objective to prolong the life of the power system as much as possible on the premise of ensuring the fuel economy. The results indicate that the optimized PMP showed a comprehensive optimal performance, the hydrogen consumption was 3.481 kg/100 km, and the cost was 13.042 $/h. The major contribution lies in that this paper presents a method to evaluate the effect of different strategies on vehicle performance including fuel economy and durability of the fuel cell and battery. The comparison between the two totally different strategies helps to find a better and effective solution to reduce the lifetime cost.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T10:46:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9ab78e04bbc34cb69b5a3056d93a370e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T10:46:03Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-9ab78e04bbc34cb69b5a3056d93a370e2023-11-21T22:34:57ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-06-011411326210.3390/en14113262Comparison of Two Energy Management Strategies Considering Power System Durability for PEMFC-LIB Hybrid Logistics VehicleJianying Liang0Yankun Li1Wenya Jia2Weikang Lin3Tiancai Ma4CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co. Ltd., Qingdao 266111, ChinaCRRC Qingdao Sifang Co. Ltd., Qingdao 266111, ChinaSchool of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, ChinaSchool of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, ChinaSchool of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, ChinaFor commercial applications, the durability and economy of the fuel cell hybrid system have become obstacles to be overcome, which are not only affected by the performance of core materials and components, but also closely related to the energy management strategy (EMS). This paper takes the 7.9 t fuel cell logistics vehicle as the research object, and designed the EMS from two levels of qualitative and quantitative analysis, which are the composite fuzzy control strategy optimized by genetic algorithm and Pontryagin’s minimum principle (PMP) optimized by objective function, respectively. The cost function was constructed and used as the optimization objective to prolong the life of the power system as much as possible on the premise of ensuring the fuel economy. The results indicate that the optimized PMP showed a comprehensive optimal performance, the hydrogen consumption was 3.481 kg/100 km, and the cost was 13.042 $/h. The major contribution lies in that this paper presents a method to evaluate the effect of different strategies on vehicle performance including fuel economy and durability of the fuel cell and battery. The comparison between the two totally different strategies helps to find a better and effective solution to reduce the lifetime cost.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3262proton exchange membrane fuel cellenergy management strategyfuzzy controlPontryagin’s minimum principlemulti-objective optimization
spellingShingle Jianying Liang
Yankun Li
Wenya Jia
Weikang Lin
Tiancai Ma
Comparison of Two Energy Management Strategies Considering Power System Durability for PEMFC-LIB Hybrid Logistics Vehicle
Energies
proton exchange membrane fuel cell
energy management strategy
fuzzy control
Pontryagin’s minimum principle
multi-objective optimization
title Comparison of Two Energy Management Strategies Considering Power System Durability for PEMFC-LIB Hybrid Logistics Vehicle
title_full Comparison of Two Energy Management Strategies Considering Power System Durability for PEMFC-LIB Hybrid Logistics Vehicle
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Energy Management Strategies Considering Power System Durability for PEMFC-LIB Hybrid Logistics Vehicle
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Energy Management Strategies Considering Power System Durability for PEMFC-LIB Hybrid Logistics Vehicle
title_short Comparison of Two Energy Management Strategies Considering Power System Durability for PEMFC-LIB Hybrid Logistics Vehicle
title_sort comparison of two energy management strategies considering power system durability for pemfc lib hybrid logistics vehicle
topic proton exchange membrane fuel cell
energy management strategy
fuzzy control
Pontryagin’s minimum principle
multi-objective optimization
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3262
work_keys_str_mv AT jianyingliang comparisonoftwoenergymanagementstrategiesconsideringpowersystemdurabilityforpemfclibhybridlogisticsvehicle
AT yankunli comparisonoftwoenergymanagementstrategiesconsideringpowersystemdurabilityforpemfclibhybridlogisticsvehicle
AT wenyajia comparisonoftwoenergymanagementstrategiesconsideringpowersystemdurabilityforpemfclibhybridlogisticsvehicle
AT weikanglin comparisonoftwoenergymanagementstrategiesconsideringpowersystemdurabilityforpemfclibhybridlogisticsvehicle
AT tiancaima comparisonoftwoenergymanagementstrategiesconsideringpowersystemdurabilityforpemfclibhybridlogisticsvehicle