Pollen Source Affects Development and Behavioral Preferences in Honey Bees

With the availability of various plants in bloom simultaneously, honey bees prefer to collect some pollen types over others. To better understand pollen’s role as a reward for workers, we compared the digestibility and nutritional value of two pollen diets, namely, pear (<i>Pyrus bretschneider...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jun Lan, Guiling Ding, Weihua Ma, Yusuo Jiang, Jiaxing Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Insects
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/12/2/130
Description
Summary:With the availability of various plants in bloom simultaneously, honey bees prefer to collect some pollen types over others. To better understand pollen’s role as a reward for workers, we compared the digestibility and nutritional value of two pollen diets, namely, pear (<i>Pyrus bretschneideri</i> Rehd.) and apricot (<i>Armeniaca sibirica</i> L.). We investigated the visits, pollen consumption, and pollen extraction efficiency of caged <i>Apis mellifera</i> workers. Newly emerged workers were reared, and the effects of two pollen diets on their physiological status (the development of hypopharyngeal glands and ovaries) were compared. The choice-test experiments indicated a significant preference of <i>A. mellifera</i> workers for apricot pollen diets over pear pollen diets (number of bees landing, 29.5 ± 8.11 and 9.25 ± 5.10, <i>p</i> < 0.001 and pollen consumption, 0.052 ± 0.026 g/day and 0.033 ± 0.013 g/day, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Both pollen diets had comparable extraction efficiencies (67.63% for pear pollen and 67.73% for apricot pollen). Caged workers fed different pollen diets also exhibited similar ovarian development (<i>p</i> > 0.05). However, workers fed apricot pollen had significantly larger hypopharyngeal glands than those fed pear pollen (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Our results indicated that the benefits conferred to honey bees by different pollen diets may influence their foraging preference.
ISSN:2075-4450