Abundance of spring‐ and winter‐active arthropods declines with warming

Abstract Because ectotherm activity and metabolism are sensitive to temperature, terrestrial arthropods may be especially responsive to ongoing climatic warming. Here, we quantified responses of arthropod abundance to two years of warming in an outdoor temperature manipulation experiment at Duke For...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacquelyn L. Fitzgerald, Katharine L. Stuble, Lauren M. Nichols, Sarah E. Diamond, Thomas R. Wentworth, Shannon L. Pelini, Nicholas J. Gotelli, Nathan J. Sanders, Robert R. Dunn, Clint A. Penick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-04-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3473
_version_ 1818837334584459264
author Jacquelyn L. Fitzgerald
Katharine L. Stuble
Lauren M. Nichols
Sarah E. Diamond
Thomas R. Wentworth
Shannon L. Pelini
Nicholas J. Gotelli
Nathan J. Sanders
Robert R. Dunn
Clint A. Penick
author_facet Jacquelyn L. Fitzgerald
Katharine L. Stuble
Lauren M. Nichols
Sarah E. Diamond
Thomas R. Wentworth
Shannon L. Pelini
Nicholas J. Gotelli
Nathan J. Sanders
Robert R. Dunn
Clint A. Penick
author_sort Jacquelyn L. Fitzgerald
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Because ectotherm activity and metabolism are sensitive to temperature, terrestrial arthropods may be especially responsive to ongoing climatic warming. Here, we quantified responses of arthropod abundance to two years of warming in an outdoor temperature manipulation experiment at Duke Forest, North Carolina, USA. Nine open‐top chambers were individually heated year‐round from 1.5° to 5.5°C above ambient temperature. From two years of monthly pitfall trapping, we collected and identified 4,468 arthropods representing 24 orders. We initially predicted that arthropods would experience the greatest negative effects of experimental warming during the summer months, when temperatures reach their yearly maximum and arthropods may be close to their maximum thermal tolerance limits. Instead, we found that the strongest negative effects on arthropod abundance occurred during the winter and spring, when ambient temperatures are relatively cooler, whereas the effects of experimental warming on abundance were not significant during the summer or fall. During the spring of 2012, the warmest spring on record for the southeastern USA, total arthropod abundance declined 20% per °C of experimental warming. Abundance declines were driven largely by flies (Diptera), which were the most abundant insect order, representing approximately a third of all arthropods collected. The most abundant arthropod family, Mycetophilidae (fungus gnats), declined 64% per °C of warming during the spring of 2012. Although previous research on climatic warming has focused on the impact of maximum yearly temperatures on organismal performance, our results are more consistent with the cool‐season sensitivity hypothesis, which posits that arthropods adapted for cooler conditions are likely to face the strongest negative effects of warming during the cooler seasons.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T03:20:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9ac1309ebcb84570b279edfdffd5544b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2150-8925
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T03:20:51Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecosphere
spelling doaj.art-9ac1309ebcb84570b279edfdffd5544b2022-12-21T20:37:46ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252021-04-01124n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.3473Abundance of spring‐ and winter‐active arthropods declines with warmingJacquelyn L. Fitzgerald0Katharine L. Stuble1Lauren M. Nichols2Sarah E. Diamond3Thomas R. Wentworth4Shannon L. Pelini5Nicholas J. Gotelli6Nathan J. Sanders7Robert R. Dunn8Clint A. Penick9Plant Biology and Conservation Northwestern University Evanston Illinois60201USAThe Holden Arboretum Kirtland Ohio44094USADepartment of Applied Ecology North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina27695USADepartment of Biology Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio44106USADepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina27695USADepartment of Biological Sciences Bowling Green State University Bowling Green Ohio43403USADepartment of Biology University of Vermont Burlington Vermont05405USAEnvironmental Program Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources University of Vermont Burlington Vermont05405USADepartment of Applied Ecology North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina27695USADepartment of Ecology, Evolution & Organismal Biology Kennesaw State University Kennesaw Georgia30144USAAbstract Because ectotherm activity and metabolism are sensitive to temperature, terrestrial arthropods may be especially responsive to ongoing climatic warming. Here, we quantified responses of arthropod abundance to two years of warming in an outdoor temperature manipulation experiment at Duke Forest, North Carolina, USA. Nine open‐top chambers were individually heated year‐round from 1.5° to 5.5°C above ambient temperature. From two years of monthly pitfall trapping, we collected and identified 4,468 arthropods representing 24 orders. We initially predicted that arthropods would experience the greatest negative effects of experimental warming during the summer months, when temperatures reach their yearly maximum and arthropods may be close to their maximum thermal tolerance limits. Instead, we found that the strongest negative effects on arthropod abundance occurred during the winter and spring, when ambient temperatures are relatively cooler, whereas the effects of experimental warming on abundance were not significant during the summer or fall. During the spring of 2012, the warmest spring on record for the southeastern USA, total arthropod abundance declined 20% per °C of experimental warming. Abundance declines were driven largely by flies (Diptera), which were the most abundant insect order, representing approximately a third of all arthropods collected. The most abundant arthropod family, Mycetophilidae (fungus gnats), declined 64% per °C of warming during the spring of 2012. Although previous research on climatic warming has focused on the impact of maximum yearly temperatures on organismal performance, our results are more consistent with the cool‐season sensitivity hypothesis, which posits that arthropods adapted for cooler conditions are likely to face the strongest negative effects of warming during the cooler seasons.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3473abundance declinesarthropodsclimate changeglobal warminginsectsseasonality
spellingShingle Jacquelyn L. Fitzgerald
Katharine L. Stuble
Lauren M. Nichols
Sarah E. Diamond
Thomas R. Wentworth
Shannon L. Pelini
Nicholas J. Gotelli
Nathan J. Sanders
Robert R. Dunn
Clint A. Penick
Abundance of spring‐ and winter‐active arthropods declines with warming
Ecosphere
abundance declines
arthropods
climate change
global warming
insects
seasonality
title Abundance of spring‐ and winter‐active arthropods declines with warming
title_full Abundance of spring‐ and winter‐active arthropods declines with warming
title_fullStr Abundance of spring‐ and winter‐active arthropods declines with warming
title_full_unstemmed Abundance of spring‐ and winter‐active arthropods declines with warming
title_short Abundance of spring‐ and winter‐active arthropods declines with warming
title_sort abundance of spring and winter active arthropods declines with warming
topic abundance declines
arthropods
climate change
global warming
insects
seasonality
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3473
work_keys_str_mv AT jacquelynlfitzgerald abundanceofspringandwinteractivearthropodsdeclineswithwarming
AT katharinelstuble abundanceofspringandwinteractivearthropodsdeclineswithwarming
AT laurenmnichols abundanceofspringandwinteractivearthropodsdeclineswithwarming
AT sarahediamond abundanceofspringandwinteractivearthropodsdeclineswithwarming
AT thomasrwentworth abundanceofspringandwinteractivearthropodsdeclineswithwarming
AT shannonlpelini abundanceofspringandwinteractivearthropodsdeclineswithwarming
AT nicholasjgotelli abundanceofspringandwinteractivearthropodsdeclineswithwarming
AT nathanjsanders abundanceofspringandwinteractivearthropodsdeclineswithwarming
AT robertrdunn abundanceofspringandwinteractivearthropodsdeclineswithwarming
AT clintapenick abundanceofspringandwinteractivearthropodsdeclineswithwarming