Effect of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy on short-term clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background The long-term prognosis of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery for early cervical cancer is controversial. This study mainly discusses the feasibility and effectiveness of the endocutter in radical laparoscopic hysterectomy for early cervical cancer. Methods A single-cent...
Main Authors: | Xin Lv, Bo Ding, JingYun Xu, Yang Shen |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2023-06-01
|
Series: | World Journal of Surgical Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03044-3 |
Similar Items
-
Comparative single-center study between modified laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
by: Xuqing Li, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy
by: Jona Röseler, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy vs. open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer
by: Greg Marchand, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy
by: Cheng Luo, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01) -
Evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for treating cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
by: Zhen Zeng, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)