Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners: evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries

Mark F Harris,1 Jenny Advocat,2 Benjamin F Crabtree,3 Jean-Frederic Levesque,1,4 William L Miller,5 Jane M Gunn,6 William Hogg,7 Cathie M Scott,8 Sabrina M Chase,9 Lisa Halma,10 Grant M Russell11 1Center for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2Southern Academ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harris MF, Advocat J, Crabtree BF, Levesque JF, Miller WL, Gunn JM, Hogg W, Scott CM, Chase SM, Halma L, Russell GM
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/interprofessional-teamwork-innovations-for-primary-health-care-practic-peer-reviewed-article-JMDH
_version_ 1818656422655688704
author Harris MF
Advocat J
Crabtree BF
Levesque JF
Miller WL
Gunn JM
Hogg W
Scott CM
Chase SM
Halma L
Russell GM
author_facet Harris MF
Advocat J
Crabtree BF
Levesque JF
Miller WL
Gunn JM
Hogg W
Scott CM
Chase SM
Halma L
Russell GM
author_sort Harris MF
collection DOAJ
description Mark F Harris,1 Jenny Advocat,2 Benjamin F Crabtree,3 Jean-Frederic Levesque,1,4 William L Miller,5 Jane M Gunn,6 William Hogg,7 Cathie M Scott,8 Sabrina M Chase,9 Lisa Halma,10 Grant M Russell11 1Center for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2Southern Academic Primary Care Research Unit, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia; 3Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; 4Bureau of Health Information, NSW Government, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 5Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA; 6Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 7The CT Lamont Primary Care Research Center, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, 8Alberta Centre for Child, Family, and Community Research, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; 9Rutgers University, Rutgers School of Nursing, Rutgers, NJ, USA; 10Alberta Health Services, Lethbridge, AB, Canada; 11School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia Context: A key aim of reforms to primary health care (PHC) in many countries has been to enhance interprofessional teamwork. However, the impact of these changes on practitioners has not been well understood.Objective: To assess the impact of reform policies and interventions that have aimed to create or enhance teamwork on professional communication relationships, roles, and work satisfaction in PHC practices.Design: Collaborative synthesis of 12 mixed methods studies.Setting: Primary care practices undergoing transformational change in three countries: Australia, Canada, and the USA, including three Canadian provinces (Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec).Methods: We conducted a synthesis and secondary analysis of 12 qualitative and quantitative studies conducted by the authors in order to understand the impacts and how they were influenced by local context.Results: There was a diverse range of complex reforms seeking to foster interprofessional teamwork in the care of patients with chronic disease. The impact on communication and relationships between different professional groups, the roles of nursing and allied health services, and the expressed satisfaction of PHC providers with their work varied more within than between jurisdictions. These variations were associated with local contextual factors such as the size, power dynamics, leadership, and physical environment of the practice. Unintended consequences included deterioration of the work satisfaction of some team members and conflict between medical and nonmedical professional groups.Conclusion: The variation in impacts can be understood to have arisen from the complexity of interprofessional dynamics at the practice level. The same characteristic could have both positive and negative influence on different aspects (eg, larger practice may have less capacity for adoption but more capacity to support interprofessional practice). Thus, the impacts are not entirely predictable and need to be monitored, and so that interventions can be adapted at the local level.Keywords: interprofessional care, primary health care, teamwork, research synthesis
first_indexed 2024-12-17T03:25:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9ac57433dbbd4bc08a1e98614eeb1d5d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-2390
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T03:25:20Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
spelling doaj.art-9ac57433dbbd4bc08a1e98614eeb1d5d2022-12-21T22:05:25ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare1178-23902016-01-012016Issue 1354625434Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners: evidence from a comparison of reform in three countriesHarris MFAdvocat JCrabtree BFLevesque JFMiller WLGunn JMHogg WScott CMChase SMHalma LRussell GMMark F Harris,1 Jenny Advocat,2 Benjamin F Crabtree,3 Jean-Frederic Levesque,1,4 William L Miller,5 Jane M Gunn,6 William Hogg,7 Cathie M Scott,8 Sabrina M Chase,9 Lisa Halma,10 Grant M Russell11 1Center for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2Southern Academic Primary Care Research Unit, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia; 3Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; 4Bureau of Health Information, NSW Government, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 5Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA; 6Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 7The CT Lamont Primary Care Research Center, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, 8Alberta Centre for Child, Family, and Community Research, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; 9Rutgers University, Rutgers School of Nursing, Rutgers, NJ, USA; 10Alberta Health Services, Lethbridge, AB, Canada; 11School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia Context: A key aim of reforms to primary health care (PHC) in many countries has been to enhance interprofessional teamwork. However, the impact of these changes on practitioners has not been well understood.Objective: To assess the impact of reform policies and interventions that have aimed to create or enhance teamwork on professional communication relationships, roles, and work satisfaction in PHC practices.Design: Collaborative synthesis of 12 mixed methods studies.Setting: Primary care practices undergoing transformational change in three countries: Australia, Canada, and the USA, including three Canadian provinces (Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec).Methods: We conducted a synthesis and secondary analysis of 12 qualitative and quantitative studies conducted by the authors in order to understand the impacts and how they were influenced by local context.Results: There was a diverse range of complex reforms seeking to foster interprofessional teamwork in the care of patients with chronic disease. The impact on communication and relationships between different professional groups, the roles of nursing and allied health services, and the expressed satisfaction of PHC providers with their work varied more within than between jurisdictions. These variations were associated with local contextual factors such as the size, power dynamics, leadership, and physical environment of the practice. Unintended consequences included deterioration of the work satisfaction of some team members and conflict between medical and nonmedical professional groups.Conclusion: The variation in impacts can be understood to have arisen from the complexity of interprofessional dynamics at the practice level. The same characteristic could have both positive and negative influence on different aspects (eg, larger practice may have less capacity for adoption but more capacity to support interprofessional practice). Thus, the impacts are not entirely predictable and need to be monitored, and so that interventions can be adapted at the local level.Keywords: interprofessional care, primary health care, teamwork, research synthesishttps://www.dovepress.com/interprofessional-teamwork-innovations-for-primary-health-care-practic-peer-reviewed-article-JMDHInter-professional careprimary careteamworkresearch synthesis
spellingShingle Harris MF
Advocat J
Crabtree BF
Levesque JF
Miller WL
Gunn JM
Hogg W
Scott CM
Chase SM
Halma L
Russell GM
Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners: evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Inter-professional care
primary care
teamwork
research synthesis
title Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners: evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries
title_full Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners: evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries
title_fullStr Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners: evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries
title_full_unstemmed Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners: evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries
title_short Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners: evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries
title_sort interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries
topic Inter-professional care
primary care
teamwork
research synthesis
url https://www.dovepress.com/interprofessional-teamwork-innovations-for-primary-health-care-practic-peer-reviewed-article-JMDH
work_keys_str_mv AT harrismf interprofessionalteamworkinnovationsforprimaryhealthcarepracticesandpractitionersevidencefromacomparisonofreforminthreecountries
AT advocatj interprofessionalteamworkinnovationsforprimaryhealthcarepracticesandpractitionersevidencefromacomparisonofreforminthreecountries
AT crabtreebf interprofessionalteamworkinnovationsforprimaryhealthcarepracticesandpractitionersevidencefromacomparisonofreforminthreecountries
AT levesquejf interprofessionalteamworkinnovationsforprimaryhealthcarepracticesandpractitionersevidencefromacomparisonofreforminthreecountries
AT millerwl interprofessionalteamworkinnovationsforprimaryhealthcarepracticesandpractitionersevidencefromacomparisonofreforminthreecountries
AT gunnjm interprofessionalteamworkinnovationsforprimaryhealthcarepracticesandpractitionersevidencefromacomparisonofreforminthreecountries
AT hoggw interprofessionalteamworkinnovationsforprimaryhealthcarepracticesandpractitionersevidencefromacomparisonofreforminthreecountries
AT scottcm interprofessionalteamworkinnovationsforprimaryhealthcarepracticesandpractitionersevidencefromacomparisonofreforminthreecountries
AT chasesm interprofessionalteamworkinnovationsforprimaryhealthcarepracticesandpractitionersevidencefromacomparisonofreforminthreecountries
AT halmal interprofessionalteamworkinnovationsforprimaryhealthcarepracticesandpractitionersevidencefromacomparisonofreforminthreecountries
AT russellgm interprofessionalteamworkinnovationsforprimaryhealthcarepracticesandpractitionersevidencefromacomparisonofreforminthreecountries