Comparative economic analysis between drugs available in primary health care and in the Popular Pharmacy Program of Brazil in a Brazilian capital

Objective: To compare public expenditures on medications distributed in Primary Health Care through the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) with those provided by the PFPB in the city of Porto Alegre, RS. Methods: A cross-sectional economic analysis was conducted by examining the items available t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leonel Augusto ALMEIDA, Graziele Pereira PEDRAZZA, Natália Merico BELTRAMI, Diego GNATTA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde 2023-12-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde
Online Access:https://rbfhss.org.br/sbrafh/article/view/911
_version_ 1797390895333507072
author Leonel Augusto ALMEIDA
Graziele Pereira PEDRAZZA
Natália Merico BELTRAMI
Diego GNATTA
author_facet Leonel Augusto ALMEIDA
Graziele Pereira PEDRAZZA
Natália Merico BELTRAMI
Diego GNATTA
author_sort Leonel Augusto ALMEIDA
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To compare public expenditures on medications distributed in Primary Health Care through the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) with those provided by the PFPB in the city of Porto Alegre, RS. Methods: A cross-sectional economic analysis was conducted by examining the items available through the Municipal List of Essential Medications (REMUME) for the year 2020 and extracting data from the local bidding processes. The calculation factor considered the annual value of committed medications and the annual structural and human resource costs associated with maintaining all stages of pharmaceutical care, from procurement to medication dispensation, as detailed in the municipal management report. PFPB costs, in Brazilian Reais and US Dollars per pharmaceutical unit, for the same items available in the SUS, were determined in accordance with Ministry of Health ordinances No. 2,898 of November 3, 2021, and No. 5 of September 28, 2017. Results: A total of 16 medications were selected, and the overall difference between the costs incurred by the Municipal Government of Porto Alegre (PMPA) and the estimated costs of the PFPB amounted to R$ 6,503,221.20 ($1,245,827.82), approximately 1.77 times the annual cost incurred by the PMPA for all stages of pharmaceutical care, from procurement to medication dispensation. Sodium alendronate 70 mg was found to be the primary contributor to the cost differential among access to medications. In terms of annual expenditures, simvastatin 20 mg was identified as the medication incurring the highest costs for both the PMPA and the PFPB. Conclusion: The study revealed higher medication expenditures through the PFPB. The variance in logistical stages of medication distribution could be redirected towards expanding pharmaceutical services and improving structural aspects in Primary Health Care, thereby contributing to Rational Medication Use. This, in turn, may result in reduced costs associated with the treatment of medication-related morbidities.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T23:25:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9ad117c3d1994198ac01874250764e11
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2179-5924
2316-7750
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T23:25:00Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde
spelling doaj.art-9ad117c3d1994198ac01874250764e112023-12-14T20:35:55ZengSociedade Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de SaúdeRevista Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde2179-59242316-77502023-12-0114491191110.30968/rbfhss.2023.144.09111294Comparative economic analysis between drugs available in primary health care and in the Popular Pharmacy Program of Brazil in a Brazilian capitalLeonel Augusto ALMEIDAhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5713-0410Graziele Pereira PEDRAZZAhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6385-9766Natália Merico BELTRAMIhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4515-8464Diego GNATTAhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1049-8899Objective: To compare public expenditures on medications distributed in Primary Health Care through the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) with those provided by the PFPB in the city of Porto Alegre, RS. Methods: A cross-sectional economic analysis was conducted by examining the items available through the Municipal List of Essential Medications (REMUME) for the year 2020 and extracting data from the local bidding processes. The calculation factor considered the annual value of committed medications and the annual structural and human resource costs associated with maintaining all stages of pharmaceutical care, from procurement to medication dispensation, as detailed in the municipal management report. PFPB costs, in Brazilian Reais and US Dollars per pharmaceutical unit, for the same items available in the SUS, were determined in accordance with Ministry of Health ordinances No. 2,898 of November 3, 2021, and No. 5 of September 28, 2017. Results: A total of 16 medications were selected, and the overall difference between the costs incurred by the Municipal Government of Porto Alegre (PMPA) and the estimated costs of the PFPB amounted to R$ 6,503,221.20 ($1,245,827.82), approximately 1.77 times the annual cost incurred by the PMPA for all stages of pharmaceutical care, from procurement to medication dispensation. Sodium alendronate 70 mg was found to be the primary contributor to the cost differential among access to medications. In terms of annual expenditures, simvastatin 20 mg was identified as the medication incurring the highest costs for both the PMPA and the PFPB. Conclusion: The study revealed higher medication expenditures through the PFPB. The variance in logistical stages of medication distribution could be redirected towards expanding pharmaceutical services and improving structural aspects in Primary Health Care, thereby contributing to Rational Medication Use. This, in turn, may result in reduced costs associated with the treatment of medication-related morbidities.https://rbfhss.org.br/sbrafh/article/view/911
spellingShingle Leonel Augusto ALMEIDA
Graziele Pereira PEDRAZZA
Natália Merico BELTRAMI
Diego GNATTA
Comparative economic analysis between drugs available in primary health care and in the Popular Pharmacy Program of Brazil in a Brazilian capital
Revista Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde
title Comparative economic analysis between drugs available in primary health care and in the Popular Pharmacy Program of Brazil in a Brazilian capital
title_full Comparative economic analysis between drugs available in primary health care and in the Popular Pharmacy Program of Brazil in a Brazilian capital
title_fullStr Comparative economic analysis between drugs available in primary health care and in the Popular Pharmacy Program of Brazil in a Brazilian capital
title_full_unstemmed Comparative economic analysis between drugs available in primary health care and in the Popular Pharmacy Program of Brazil in a Brazilian capital
title_short Comparative economic analysis between drugs available in primary health care and in the Popular Pharmacy Program of Brazil in a Brazilian capital
title_sort comparative economic analysis between drugs available in primary health care and in the popular pharmacy program of brazil in a brazilian capital
url https://rbfhss.org.br/sbrafh/article/view/911
work_keys_str_mv AT leonelaugustoalmeida comparativeeconomicanalysisbetweendrugsavailableinprimaryhealthcareandinthepopularpharmacyprogramofbrazilinabraziliancapital
AT grazielepereirapedrazza comparativeeconomicanalysisbetweendrugsavailableinprimaryhealthcareandinthepopularpharmacyprogramofbrazilinabraziliancapital
AT nataliamericobeltrami comparativeeconomicanalysisbetweendrugsavailableinprimaryhealthcareandinthepopularpharmacyprogramofbrazilinabraziliancapital
AT diegognatta comparativeeconomicanalysisbetweendrugsavailableinprimaryhealthcareandinthepopularpharmacyprogramofbrazilinabraziliancapital