A Natural Human-Drone Embodied Interface: Empirical Comparison With a Traditional Interface

Despite the importance of usability in human-machine interaction (HMI), most commonly used devices are not usable by all potential users. In particular, users with low or null technological experience, or with special needs, require carefully designed systems and easy-to-use interfaces supporting re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marina Di Vincenzo, Francesco Palini, Maria De Marsico, Anna M. Borghi, Gianluca Baldassarre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurorobotics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbot.2022.898859/full
_version_ 1811181905471602688
author Marina Di Vincenzo
Francesco Palini
Maria De Marsico
Anna M. Borghi
Anna M. Borghi
Gianluca Baldassarre
Gianluca Baldassarre
author_facet Marina Di Vincenzo
Francesco Palini
Maria De Marsico
Anna M. Borghi
Anna M. Borghi
Gianluca Baldassarre
Gianluca Baldassarre
author_sort Marina Di Vincenzo
collection DOAJ
description Despite the importance of usability in human-machine interaction (HMI), most commonly used devices are not usable by all potential users. In particular, users with low or null technological experience, or with special needs, require carefully designed systems and easy-to-use interfaces supporting recognition over recall. To this purpose, Natural User Interfaces (NUIs) represent an effective strategy as the user's learning is facilitated by features of the interface that mimic the human “natural” sensorimotor embodied interactions with the environment. This paper compares the usability of a new NUI (based on an eye-tracker and hand gesture recognition) with a traditional interface (keyboard) for the distal control of a simulated drone flying in a virtual environment. The whole interface relies on “dAIsy”, a new software allowing the flexible use of different input devices and the control of different robotic platforms. The 59 users involved in the study were required to complete two tasks with each interface, while their performance was recorded: (a) exploration: detecting trees embedded in an urban environment; (b) accuracy: guiding the drone as accurately and fast as possible along a predefined track. Then they were administered questionnaires regarding the user's background, the perceived embodiment of the device, and the perceived quality of the virtual experience while either using the NUI or the traditional interface. The results appear controversial and call for further investigation: (a) contrary to our hypothesis, the specific NUI used led to lower performance than the traditional interface; (b) however, the NUI was evaluated as more natural and embodied. The final part of the paper discusses the possible causes underlying these results that suggest possible future improvements of the NUI.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T09:24:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9ad8414364f14cf89b10a135d8f2dc4c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5218
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T09:24:50Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurorobotics
spelling doaj.art-9ad8414364f14cf89b10a135d8f2dc4c2022-12-22T04:32:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurorobotics1662-52182022-10-011610.3389/fnbot.2022.898859898859A Natural Human-Drone Embodied Interface: Empirical Comparison With a Traditional InterfaceMarina Di Vincenzo0Francesco Palini1Maria De Marsico2Anna M. Borghi3Anna M. Borghi4Gianluca Baldassarre5Gianluca Baldassarre6AS-AI - Advanced School of AI, Rome, ItalyAS-AI - Advanced School of AI, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Computer Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, ItalyInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome, ItalyInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome, ItalyAI2Life Srl Innovative Startup, Spin-Off of ISTC-CNR, Rome, ItalyDespite the importance of usability in human-machine interaction (HMI), most commonly used devices are not usable by all potential users. In particular, users with low or null technological experience, or with special needs, require carefully designed systems and easy-to-use interfaces supporting recognition over recall. To this purpose, Natural User Interfaces (NUIs) represent an effective strategy as the user's learning is facilitated by features of the interface that mimic the human “natural” sensorimotor embodied interactions with the environment. This paper compares the usability of a new NUI (based on an eye-tracker and hand gesture recognition) with a traditional interface (keyboard) for the distal control of a simulated drone flying in a virtual environment. The whole interface relies on “dAIsy”, a new software allowing the flexible use of different input devices and the control of different robotic platforms. The 59 users involved in the study were required to complete two tasks with each interface, while their performance was recorded: (a) exploration: detecting trees embedded in an urban environment; (b) accuracy: guiding the drone as accurately and fast as possible along a predefined track. Then they were administered questionnaires regarding the user's background, the perceived embodiment of the device, and the perceived quality of the virtual experience while either using the NUI or the traditional interface. The results appear controversial and call for further investigation: (a) contrary to our hypothesis, the specific NUI used led to lower performance than the traditional interface; (b) however, the NUI was evaluated as more natural and embodied. The final part of the paper discusses the possible causes underlying these results that suggest possible future improvements of the NUI.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbot.2022.898859/fullhuman-drone interfacehuman-machine interfaceflexible software dAIsyhuman performanceexploration and accuracy tasksembodiment and virtual experience questionnaires
spellingShingle Marina Di Vincenzo
Francesco Palini
Maria De Marsico
Anna M. Borghi
Anna M. Borghi
Gianluca Baldassarre
Gianluca Baldassarre
A Natural Human-Drone Embodied Interface: Empirical Comparison With a Traditional Interface
Frontiers in Neurorobotics
human-drone interface
human-machine interface
flexible software dAIsy
human performance
exploration and accuracy tasks
embodiment and virtual experience questionnaires
title A Natural Human-Drone Embodied Interface: Empirical Comparison With a Traditional Interface
title_full A Natural Human-Drone Embodied Interface: Empirical Comparison With a Traditional Interface
title_fullStr A Natural Human-Drone Embodied Interface: Empirical Comparison With a Traditional Interface
title_full_unstemmed A Natural Human-Drone Embodied Interface: Empirical Comparison With a Traditional Interface
title_short A Natural Human-Drone Embodied Interface: Empirical Comparison With a Traditional Interface
title_sort natural human drone embodied interface empirical comparison with a traditional interface
topic human-drone interface
human-machine interface
flexible software dAIsy
human performance
exploration and accuracy tasks
embodiment and virtual experience questionnaires
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbot.2022.898859/full
work_keys_str_mv AT marinadivincenzo anaturalhumandroneembodiedinterfaceempiricalcomparisonwithatraditionalinterface
AT francescopalini anaturalhumandroneembodiedinterfaceempiricalcomparisonwithatraditionalinterface
AT mariademarsico anaturalhumandroneembodiedinterfaceempiricalcomparisonwithatraditionalinterface
AT annamborghi anaturalhumandroneembodiedinterfaceempiricalcomparisonwithatraditionalinterface
AT annamborghi anaturalhumandroneembodiedinterfaceempiricalcomparisonwithatraditionalinterface
AT gianlucabaldassarre anaturalhumandroneembodiedinterfaceempiricalcomparisonwithatraditionalinterface
AT gianlucabaldassarre anaturalhumandroneembodiedinterfaceempiricalcomparisonwithatraditionalinterface
AT marinadivincenzo naturalhumandroneembodiedinterfaceempiricalcomparisonwithatraditionalinterface
AT francescopalini naturalhumandroneembodiedinterfaceempiricalcomparisonwithatraditionalinterface
AT mariademarsico naturalhumandroneembodiedinterfaceempiricalcomparisonwithatraditionalinterface
AT annamborghi naturalhumandroneembodiedinterfaceempiricalcomparisonwithatraditionalinterface
AT annamborghi naturalhumandroneembodiedinterfaceempiricalcomparisonwithatraditionalinterface
AT gianlucabaldassarre naturalhumandroneembodiedinterfaceempiricalcomparisonwithatraditionalinterface
AT gianlucabaldassarre naturalhumandroneembodiedinterfaceempiricalcomparisonwithatraditionalinterface