Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?

The calcitic lenses in the eyes of Palaeozoic trilobites are unique in the animal kingdom, although the use of calcite would have conveyed great advantages for vision in aquatic systems. Calcite lenses are transparent, and due to their high refractive index they would facilitate the focusing of ligh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brigitte Schoenemann, Euan N.K. Clarkson, Gábor Horváth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2015-12-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/1492.pdf
_version_ 1797419789426098176
author Brigitte Schoenemann
Euan N.K. Clarkson
Gábor Horváth
author_facet Brigitte Schoenemann
Euan N.K. Clarkson
Gábor Horváth
author_sort Brigitte Schoenemann
collection DOAJ
description The calcitic lenses in the eyes of Palaeozoic trilobites are unique in the animal kingdom, although the use of calcite would have conveyed great advantages for vision in aquatic systems. Calcite lenses are transparent, and due to their high refractive index they would facilitate the focusing of light. In some respects, however, calcite lenses bear evident disadvantages. Birefringence would cause double images at different depths, but this is not a problem for trilobites since the difference in the paths of the ordinary and extraordinary rays is less than the diameter of the receptor cells. Another point, not discussed hitherto, is that calcite fluoresces when illuminated with UV-A. Here we show experimentally that calcite lenses fluoresce, and we discuss why fluorescence does not diminish the optical quality of these lenses and the image formed by them. In the environments in which the trilobites lived, UV-A would not have been a relevant factor, and thus fluorescence would not have disturbed or confused their visual system. We also argue that whatever the reason that calcite was never again used successfully in the visual systems of aquatic arthropods, it was not fluorescence.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T06:53:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9ae204f27d8c4f0c92797b35da9f2b74
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T06:53:22Z
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-9ae204f27d8c4f0c92797b35da9f2b742023-12-03T10:16:23ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592015-12-013e149210.7717/peerj.1492Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?Brigitte Schoenemann0Euan N.K. Clarkson1Gábor Horváth2Department of Animal Physiology and Institute of Biology Education (Zoology),University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyGrant Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomEnvironmental Optics Laboratory, Department of Biological Physics, Physical Institute,Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, HungaryThe calcitic lenses in the eyes of Palaeozoic trilobites are unique in the animal kingdom, although the use of calcite would have conveyed great advantages for vision in aquatic systems. Calcite lenses are transparent, and due to their high refractive index they would facilitate the focusing of light. In some respects, however, calcite lenses bear evident disadvantages. Birefringence would cause double images at different depths, but this is not a problem for trilobites since the difference in the paths of the ordinary and extraordinary rays is less than the diameter of the receptor cells. Another point, not discussed hitherto, is that calcite fluoresces when illuminated with UV-A. Here we show experimentally that calcite lenses fluoresce, and we discuss why fluorescence does not diminish the optical quality of these lenses and the image formed by them. In the environments in which the trilobites lived, UV-A would not have been a relevant factor, and thus fluorescence would not have disturbed or confused their visual system. We also argue that whatever the reason that calcite was never again used successfully in the visual systems of aquatic arthropods, it was not fluorescence.https://peerj.com/articles/1492.pdfVisionTrilobiteArthropodUV-radiationLuminesceneOptics
spellingShingle Brigitte Schoenemann
Euan N.K. Clarkson
Gábor Horváth
Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?
PeerJ
Vision
Trilobite
Arthropod
UV-radiation
Luminescene
Optics
title Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?
title_full Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?
title_fullStr Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?
title_full_unstemmed Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?
title_short Why did the UV-A-induced photoluminescent blue–green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites?
title_sort why did the uv a induced photoluminescent blue green glow in trilobite eyes and exoskeletons not cause problems for trilobites
topic Vision
Trilobite
Arthropod
UV-radiation
Luminescene
Optics
url https://peerj.com/articles/1492.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT brigitteschoenemann whydidtheuvainducedphotoluminescentbluegreenglowintrilobiteeyesandexoskeletonsnotcauseproblemsfortrilobites
AT euannkclarkson whydidtheuvainducedphotoluminescentbluegreenglowintrilobiteeyesandexoskeletonsnotcauseproblemsfortrilobites
AT gaborhorvath whydidtheuvainducedphotoluminescentbluegreenglowintrilobiteeyesandexoskeletonsnotcauseproblemsfortrilobites