Improving accountability in vaccine decision-making
Introduction: Healthcare decisions, in particular those affecting entire populations, should be evidence-based and taken by decision-makers sharing broad alignment with affected stakeholders. However, criteria, priorities and procedures for decision-making are sometimes non-transparent, frequently v...
Main Authors: | James Kenneth Timmis, Steven Black, Rino Rappuoli |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2017-11-01
|
Series: | Expert Review of Vaccines |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2017.1382358 |
Similar Items
-
National Immunization Program Decision Making Using the CAPACITI Decision-Support Tool: User Feedback from Indonesia and Ethiopia
by: Maarten Jansen, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Utilization of multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support healthcare decision-making FIFARMA, 2016
by: Julia I. Drake, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and health policy making: a narrative review
by: Anuji Upekshika Gamage, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Transparency and accountability in AI systems: safeguarding wellbeing in the age of algorithmic decision-making
by: Ben Chester Cheong, et al.
Published: (2024-07-01) -
Parental Decision-Making on Childhood Vaccination
by: Kaja Damnjanović, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)