Cutaneous expression of growth-associated protein 43 is not a compelling marker for human nerve regeneration in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Growth-associated protein 43 (GAP-43) has long been used as a marker for nerve regeneration following nerve injury, with numerous in vitro and animal studies showing its upregulation in regenerating neurons. In humans, expression of GAP-43 has predominantly been examined in skin biopsies from patien...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liam Carroll, Oliver Sandy-Hindmarch, Georgios Baskozos, Guan Cheng Zhu, Julia McCarthy, Annina Schmid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277133
_version_ 1797959519561580544
author Liam Carroll
Oliver Sandy-Hindmarch
Georgios Baskozos
Guan Cheng Zhu
Julia McCarthy
Annina Schmid
author_facet Liam Carroll
Oliver Sandy-Hindmarch
Georgios Baskozos
Guan Cheng Zhu
Julia McCarthy
Annina Schmid
author_sort Liam Carroll
collection DOAJ
description Growth-associated protein 43 (GAP-43) has long been used as a marker for nerve regeneration following nerve injury, with numerous in vitro and animal studies showing its upregulation in regenerating neurons. In humans, expression of GAP-43 has predominantly been examined in skin biopsies from patients with peripheral neuropathies; with several studies showing a reduction in GAP-43 immunoreactive cutaneous nerve fibres. However, it remains elusive whether cutaneous GAP-43 is a valid marker for human nerve regeneration. Here, we present a cohort of 22 patients with electrodiagnostically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), used as a model system for focal nerve injury and neural regeneration after decompression surgery. We evaluate GAP-43 immunoreactivity and RNA expression levels in finger skin biopsies taken before and 6 months after surgery, relative to healthy controls. We further classify patients as 'regenerators' or 'non-regenerators' based on post-surgical epidermal re-innervation. We demonstrate that patients with CTS have lower GAP-43 positive intra-epidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) before surgery than healthy controls. However, this difference disappears when normalising for total IENFD. Of note, we found surgery did not change GAP-43 expression in IENF, with no differences both in patients who were classified as regenerators and non-regenerators. We also did not identify pre-post surgical differences in cutaneous GAP-43 gene expression or associations with regeneration. These findings suggest cutaneous GAP-43 may not be a compelling marker for nerve regeneration in humans.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T00:33:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9ae8c39fa852484896383ae691cbe7e1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T00:33:58Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-9ae8c39fa852484896383ae691cbe7e12023-01-07T05:31:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-011711e027713310.1371/journal.pone.0277133Cutaneous expression of growth-associated protein 43 is not a compelling marker for human nerve regeneration in carpal tunnel syndrome.Liam CarrollOliver Sandy-HindmarchGeorgios BaskozosGuan Cheng ZhuJulia McCarthyAnnina SchmidGrowth-associated protein 43 (GAP-43) has long been used as a marker for nerve regeneration following nerve injury, with numerous in vitro and animal studies showing its upregulation in regenerating neurons. In humans, expression of GAP-43 has predominantly been examined in skin biopsies from patients with peripheral neuropathies; with several studies showing a reduction in GAP-43 immunoreactive cutaneous nerve fibres. However, it remains elusive whether cutaneous GAP-43 is a valid marker for human nerve regeneration. Here, we present a cohort of 22 patients with electrodiagnostically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), used as a model system for focal nerve injury and neural regeneration after decompression surgery. We evaluate GAP-43 immunoreactivity and RNA expression levels in finger skin biopsies taken before and 6 months after surgery, relative to healthy controls. We further classify patients as 'regenerators' or 'non-regenerators' based on post-surgical epidermal re-innervation. We demonstrate that patients with CTS have lower GAP-43 positive intra-epidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) before surgery than healthy controls. However, this difference disappears when normalising for total IENFD. Of note, we found surgery did not change GAP-43 expression in IENF, with no differences both in patients who were classified as regenerators and non-regenerators. We also did not identify pre-post surgical differences in cutaneous GAP-43 gene expression or associations with regeneration. These findings suggest cutaneous GAP-43 may not be a compelling marker for nerve regeneration in humans.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277133
spellingShingle Liam Carroll
Oliver Sandy-Hindmarch
Georgios Baskozos
Guan Cheng Zhu
Julia McCarthy
Annina Schmid
Cutaneous expression of growth-associated protein 43 is not a compelling marker for human nerve regeneration in carpal tunnel syndrome.
PLoS ONE
title Cutaneous expression of growth-associated protein 43 is not a compelling marker for human nerve regeneration in carpal tunnel syndrome.
title_full Cutaneous expression of growth-associated protein 43 is not a compelling marker for human nerve regeneration in carpal tunnel syndrome.
title_fullStr Cutaneous expression of growth-associated protein 43 is not a compelling marker for human nerve regeneration in carpal tunnel syndrome.
title_full_unstemmed Cutaneous expression of growth-associated protein 43 is not a compelling marker for human nerve regeneration in carpal tunnel syndrome.
title_short Cutaneous expression of growth-associated protein 43 is not a compelling marker for human nerve regeneration in carpal tunnel syndrome.
title_sort cutaneous expression of growth associated protein 43 is not a compelling marker for human nerve regeneration in carpal tunnel syndrome
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277133
work_keys_str_mv AT liamcarroll cutaneousexpressionofgrowthassociatedprotein43isnotacompellingmarkerforhumannerveregenerationincarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT oliversandyhindmarch cutaneousexpressionofgrowthassociatedprotein43isnotacompellingmarkerforhumannerveregenerationincarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT georgiosbaskozos cutaneousexpressionofgrowthassociatedprotein43isnotacompellingmarkerforhumannerveregenerationincarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT guanchengzhu cutaneousexpressionofgrowthassociatedprotein43isnotacompellingmarkerforhumannerveregenerationincarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT juliamccarthy cutaneousexpressionofgrowthassociatedprotein43isnotacompellingmarkerforhumannerveregenerationincarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT anninaschmid cutaneousexpressionofgrowthassociatedprotein43isnotacompellingmarkerforhumannerveregenerationincarpaltunnelsyndrome