Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
Summary: A small brain and short life allegedly limit cognitive abilities. Our view of invertebrate cognition may also be biased by the choice of experimental stimuli. Here, the stimuli (color) pairs used in the match-to-sample tasks affected the performance of buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrest...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2022-11-01
|
Series: | iScience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222017382 |
_version_ | 1811233110742794240 |
---|---|
author | Pizza Ka Yee Chow Topi K. Lehtonen Ville Näreaho Olli J. Loukola |
author_facet | Pizza Ka Yee Chow Topi K. Lehtonen Ville Näreaho Olli J. Loukola |
author_sort | Pizza Ka Yee Chow |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Summary: A small brain and short life allegedly limit cognitive abilities. Our view of invertebrate cognition may also be biased by the choice of experimental stimuli. Here, the stimuli (color) pairs used in the match-to-sample tasks affected the performance of buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). We trained the bees to roll a tool, a ball, to a goal that matched its color. Bees trained with a yellow-and-orange/red stimuli pair took more training bouts to reach our color-matching criterion than those trained with a blue-and-yellow stimuli pair. When assessing the bees’ concept learning ability in a transfer test with a novel color, the bees trained with blue and yellow (novel color: orange/red) were highly successful, the bees trained with blue and orange/red (novel color: yellow) did not differ from random, and those trained with yellow and orange/red (novel color: blue) failed the test. These results highlight that stimulus salience can affect our conclusions on test subjects’ cognitive ability. Therefore, we encourage paying attention to stimulus salience (among other factors) when assessing the cognition of invertebrates. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T11:14:54Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9af495dac7f040758e9e4c48f4ba4df3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2589-0042 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T11:14:54Z |
publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | iScience |
spelling | doaj.art-9af495dac7f040758e9e4c48f4ba4df32022-12-22T03:35:31ZengElsevieriScience2589-00422022-11-012511105466Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection taskPizza Ka Yee Chow0Topi K. Lehtonen1Ville Näreaho2Olli J. Loukola3Cognitive Ecology Research Group, Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; School of Psychology, University of Chester, Chester, UKCognitive Ecology Research Group, Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Natural Resources Institute Finland, Paavo Havaksen tie 3, 90570 Oulu, FinlandCognitive Ecology Research Group, Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, FinlandCognitive Ecology Research Group, Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Corresponding authorSummary: A small brain and short life allegedly limit cognitive abilities. Our view of invertebrate cognition may also be biased by the choice of experimental stimuli. Here, the stimuli (color) pairs used in the match-to-sample tasks affected the performance of buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). We trained the bees to roll a tool, a ball, to a goal that matched its color. Bees trained with a yellow-and-orange/red stimuli pair took more training bouts to reach our color-matching criterion than those trained with a blue-and-yellow stimuli pair. When assessing the bees’ concept learning ability in a transfer test with a novel color, the bees trained with blue and yellow (novel color: orange/red) were highly successful, the bees trained with blue and orange/red (novel color: yellow) did not differ from random, and those trained with yellow and orange/red (novel color: blue) failed the test. These results highlight that stimulus salience can affect our conclusions on test subjects’ cognitive ability. Therefore, we encourage paying attention to stimulus salience (among other factors) when assessing the cognition of invertebrates.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222017382EntomologyCognitive neuroscience |
spellingShingle | Pizza Ka Yee Chow Topi K. Lehtonen Ville Näreaho Olli J. Loukola Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task iScience Entomology Cognitive neuroscience |
title | Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task |
title_full | Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task |
title_fullStr | Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task |
title_full_unstemmed | Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task |
title_short | Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task |
title_sort | prior associations affect bumblebees generalization performance in a tool selection task |
topic | Entomology Cognitive neuroscience |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222017382 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pizzakayeechow priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask AT topiklehtonen priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask AT villenareaho priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask AT ollijloukola priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask |