Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task

Summary: A small brain and short life allegedly limit cognitive abilities. Our view of invertebrate cognition may also be biased by the choice of experimental stimuli. Here, the stimuli (color) pairs used in the match-to-sample tasks affected the performance of buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pizza Ka Yee Chow, Topi K. Lehtonen, Ville Näreaho, Olli J. Loukola
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-11-01
Series:iScience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222017382
_version_ 1811233110742794240
author Pizza Ka Yee Chow
Topi K. Lehtonen
Ville Näreaho
Olli J. Loukola
author_facet Pizza Ka Yee Chow
Topi K. Lehtonen
Ville Näreaho
Olli J. Loukola
author_sort Pizza Ka Yee Chow
collection DOAJ
description Summary: A small brain and short life allegedly limit cognitive abilities. Our view of invertebrate cognition may also be biased by the choice of experimental stimuli. Here, the stimuli (color) pairs used in the match-to-sample tasks affected the performance of buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). We trained the bees to roll a tool, a ball, to a goal that matched its color. Bees trained with a yellow-and-orange/red stimuli pair took more training bouts to reach our color-matching criterion than those trained with a blue-and-yellow stimuli pair. When assessing the bees’ concept learning ability in a transfer test with a novel color, the bees trained with blue and yellow (novel color: orange/red) were highly successful, the bees trained with blue and orange/red (novel color: yellow) did not differ from random, and those trained with yellow and orange/red (novel color: blue) failed the test. These results highlight that stimulus salience can affect our conclusions on test subjects’ cognitive ability. Therefore, we encourage paying attention to stimulus salience (among other factors) when assessing the cognition of invertebrates.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T11:14:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9af495dac7f040758e9e4c48f4ba4df3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2589-0042
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T11:14:54Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series iScience
spelling doaj.art-9af495dac7f040758e9e4c48f4ba4df32022-12-22T03:35:31ZengElsevieriScience2589-00422022-11-012511105466Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection taskPizza Ka Yee Chow0Topi K. Lehtonen1Ville Näreaho2Olli J. Loukola3Cognitive Ecology Research Group, Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; School of Psychology, University of Chester, Chester, UKCognitive Ecology Research Group, Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Natural Resources Institute Finland, Paavo Havaksen tie 3, 90570 Oulu, FinlandCognitive Ecology Research Group, Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, FinlandCognitive Ecology Research Group, Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Corresponding authorSummary: A small brain and short life allegedly limit cognitive abilities. Our view of invertebrate cognition may also be biased by the choice of experimental stimuli. Here, the stimuli (color) pairs used in the match-to-sample tasks affected the performance of buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). We trained the bees to roll a tool, a ball, to a goal that matched its color. Bees trained with a yellow-and-orange/red stimuli pair took more training bouts to reach our color-matching criterion than those trained with a blue-and-yellow stimuli pair. When assessing the bees’ concept learning ability in a transfer test with a novel color, the bees trained with blue and yellow (novel color: orange/red) were highly successful, the bees trained with blue and orange/red (novel color: yellow) did not differ from random, and those trained with yellow and orange/red (novel color: blue) failed the test. These results highlight that stimulus salience can affect our conclusions on test subjects’ cognitive ability. Therefore, we encourage paying attention to stimulus salience (among other factors) when assessing the cognition of invertebrates.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222017382EntomologyCognitive neuroscience
spellingShingle Pizza Ka Yee Chow
Topi K. Lehtonen
Ville Näreaho
Olli J. Loukola
Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
iScience
Entomology
Cognitive neuroscience
title Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
title_full Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
title_fullStr Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
title_full_unstemmed Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
title_short Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
title_sort prior associations affect bumblebees generalization performance in a tool selection task
topic Entomology
Cognitive neuroscience
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222017382
work_keys_str_mv AT pizzakayeechow priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask
AT topiklehtonen priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask
AT villenareaho priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask
AT ollijloukola priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask