Modeling the Total Energy Costs of Resistance Exercise: a Work in Progress

We present an aerobic and anaerobic, exercise and recovery energy cost model of intermittent energy costs utilizing task (work, Joules) as opposed to rate (per minute) measurements. Low to moderate intensity steady state exercise energy costs are typically portrayed as the volumetric rate at which o...

Cur síos iomlán

Sonraí bibleagrafaíochta
Príomhchruthaitheoirí: Victor M. Reis, Christopher B. Scott
Formáid: Alt
Teanga:English
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego 2016-01-01
Sraith:Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Ábhair:
Rochtain ar líne:https://wnus.edu.pl/cejssm/en/issue/124/article/1296/
_version_ 1828349928841150464
author Victor M. Reis
Christopher B. Scott
author_facet Victor M. Reis
Christopher B. Scott
author_sort Victor M. Reis
collection DOAJ
description We present an aerobic and anaerobic, exercise and recovery energy cost model of intermittent energy costs utilizing task (work, Joules) as opposed to rate (per minute) measurements. Low to moderate intensity steady state exercise energy costs are typically portrayed as the volumetric rate at which oxygen is consumed (VO2 L min–1), where a proportionate upward climbing linear relationship is profiled with an increasing power output; add to this the concept of the anaerobic threshold and energy costs increase with more intense aerobic exercise in disproportion to VO2 L min–1 measurements. As a per task function, intermittent work and recovery bouts contain a combined estimate of total costs, that is as kJ or kcal (not kJ.min-1 or kcal.min-1). Adopting this approach to describe single and multiple sets of resistance training, the model that emerges for intermittent resistance exercise portrays linearity between equivalent work and total energy costs that differs proportionately among conditions – “continuous” muscular endurance vs. Intermittent higher load strength work, moderately paced vs. slower and faster conditions, smaller vs. larger working muscle masses and failure (fatigue) vs. non-failure states. Moreover, per kcal (or kJ) of total energy costs, work (J) is more inefficient with a greater load and lower repetition number as opposed to lower resistance with an increased number of repetitions. The concept of energy costs Rusing disproportionately with increased or prolonged work does not appear to apply to resistance exercise.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T01:18:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9af76f96b12d433bbbb917d67dbde1e2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2300-9705
2353-2807
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T01:18:10Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
record_format Article
series Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
spelling doaj.art-9af76f96b12d433bbbb917d67dbde1e22022-12-22T02:20:47ZengWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu SzczecińskiegoCentral European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine2300-97052353-28072016-01-011410.18276/cej.2016.2-01Modeling the Total Energy Costs of Resistance Exercise: a Work in ProgressVictor M. Reis0Christopher B. Scott1Research Centre for Sports Sciences, Health Sciences & Human Development, University of Trás-os-Montes & Alto Douro (UTAD), PortugalUniversity of Southern Maine, Exercise, Health and Sport Sciences, USAWe present an aerobic and anaerobic, exercise and recovery energy cost model of intermittent energy costs utilizing task (work, Joules) as opposed to rate (per minute) measurements. Low to moderate intensity steady state exercise energy costs are typically portrayed as the volumetric rate at which oxygen is consumed (VO2 L min–1), where a proportionate upward climbing linear relationship is profiled with an increasing power output; add to this the concept of the anaerobic threshold and energy costs increase with more intense aerobic exercise in disproportion to VO2 L min–1 measurements. As a per task function, intermittent work and recovery bouts contain a combined estimate of total costs, that is as kJ or kcal (not kJ.min-1 or kcal.min-1). Adopting this approach to describe single and multiple sets of resistance training, the model that emerges for intermittent resistance exercise portrays linearity between equivalent work and total energy costs that differs proportionately among conditions – “continuous” muscular endurance vs. Intermittent higher load strength work, moderately paced vs. slower and faster conditions, smaller vs. larger working muscle masses and failure (fatigue) vs. non-failure states. Moreover, per kcal (or kJ) of total energy costs, work (J) is more inefficient with a greater load and lower repetition number as opposed to lower resistance with an increased number of repetitions. The concept of energy costs Rusing disproportionately with increased or prolonged work does not appear to apply to resistance exercise.https://wnus.edu.pl/cejssm/en/issue/124/article/1296/intermittent exerciseoxygen uptakeweight lifting
spellingShingle Victor M. Reis
Christopher B. Scott
Modeling the Total Energy Costs of Resistance Exercise: a Work in Progress
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
intermittent exercise
oxygen uptake
weight lifting
title Modeling the Total Energy Costs of Resistance Exercise: a Work in Progress
title_full Modeling the Total Energy Costs of Resistance Exercise: a Work in Progress
title_fullStr Modeling the Total Energy Costs of Resistance Exercise: a Work in Progress
title_full_unstemmed Modeling the Total Energy Costs of Resistance Exercise: a Work in Progress
title_short Modeling the Total Energy Costs of Resistance Exercise: a Work in Progress
title_sort modeling the total energy costs of resistance exercise a work in progress
topic intermittent exercise
oxygen uptake
weight lifting
url https://wnus.edu.pl/cejssm/en/issue/124/article/1296/
work_keys_str_mv AT victormreis modelingthetotalenergycostsofresistanceexerciseaworkinprogress
AT christopherbscott modelingthetotalenergycostsofresistanceexerciseaworkinprogress