DYNAMICS OF AMBIVALENT ASSESSMENT OF THE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL PROCESS DURING COVID–19 (THE CASE OF THE STUDENT PRAGMALINGUISTIC SURVEY)
The ambivalent nature of the higher educational process was clearly manifested during the COVID–19 pandemic. Such an organization of teaching process generates new cognitive learning model, thus being the relevance of this study. Purpose. It is aimed at identification of students’ verbal ambivalen...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Science and Innovation Center Publishing House
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | Sovremennye Issledovaniâ Socialʹnyh Problem |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://soc-journal.ru/jour/index.php/mssi/article/view/247 |
| _version_ | 1828088137407004672 |
|---|---|
| author | Anna V. Taktarova Marina N. Cherkasova |
| author_facet | Anna V. Taktarova Marina N. Cherkasova |
| author_sort | Anna V. Taktarova |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The ambivalent nature of the higher educational process was clearly manifested during the COVID–19 pandemic. Such an organization of teaching process generates new cognitive learning model, thus being the relevance of this study.
Purpose. It is aimed at identification of students’ verbal ambivalent behavior and function to the new learning format over two time periods in dynamics: 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. The scientific novelty of the study is to establish students’ ambivalent assessment of the educational process in terms of COVID–19. This assessment was proved experimentally during the survey.
Materials and methods. Materials of research are written recorded responses received from students during pragmalinguistic survey at the university. The following research methods were used: survey, lexico-semantic, pragmalinguistic experiment, as well as quantitative and interpretive methods.
Results. The pragmalinguistic survey gives a detailed analysis of appraisal vector over the two reference groups: the survey of the first period has changed significantly compared to the second period. All 167 respondents showed ambivalent reactions, the first group demonstrates positive-negative ambivalence, while the second group shows negative-positive ambivalence. Thus, the ambiguous, diametrically-opposed attitude of students to the educational reality from the ambivalence research approach was established. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T05:21:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9afb6b2e94f549b78a75a4609038fde2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2077-1770 2218-7405 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T05:21:56Z |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | Science and Innovation Center Publishing House |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sovremennye Issledovaniâ Socialʹnyh Problem |
| spelling | doaj.art-9afb6b2e94f549b78a75a4609038fde22022-12-23T17:02:59ZengScience and Innovation Center Publishing HouseSovremennye Issledovaniâ Socialʹnyh Problem2077-17702218-74052022-10-0114318319610.12731/2077-1770-2022-14-3-183-196247DYNAMICS OF AMBIVALENT ASSESSMENT OF THE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL PROCESS DURING COVID–19 (THE CASE OF THE STUDENT PRAGMALINGUISTIC SURVEY)Anna V. Taktarova0Marina N. Cherkasova1Федеральное Государственное Бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Ростовский Государственный университет путей сообщения»Федеральное Государственное Бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Ростовский Государственный университет путей сообщения»The ambivalent nature of the higher educational process was clearly manifested during the COVID–19 pandemic. Such an organization of teaching process generates new cognitive learning model, thus being the relevance of this study. Purpose. It is aimed at identification of students’ verbal ambivalent behavior and function to the new learning format over two time periods in dynamics: 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. The scientific novelty of the study is to establish students’ ambivalent assessment of the educational process in terms of COVID–19. This assessment was proved experimentally during the survey. Materials and methods. Materials of research are written recorded responses received from students during pragmalinguistic survey at the university. The following research methods were used: survey, lexico-semantic, pragmalinguistic experiment, as well as quantitative and interpretive methods. Results. The pragmalinguistic survey gives a detailed analysis of appraisal vector over the two reference groups: the survey of the first period has changed significantly compared to the second period. All 167 respondents showed ambivalent reactions, the first group demonstrates positive-negative ambivalence, while the second group shows negative-positive ambivalence. Thus, the ambiguous, diametrically-opposed attitude of students to the educational reality from the ambivalence research approach was established.http://soc-journal.ru/jour/index.php/mssi/article/view/247ambivalenceambivalent function and assessmentcovid–19higher school |
| spellingShingle | Anna V. Taktarova Marina N. Cherkasova DYNAMICS OF AMBIVALENT ASSESSMENT OF THE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL PROCESS DURING COVID–19 (THE CASE OF THE STUDENT PRAGMALINGUISTIC SURVEY) Sovremennye Issledovaniâ Socialʹnyh Problem ambivalence ambivalent function and assessment covid–19 higher school |
| title | DYNAMICS OF AMBIVALENT ASSESSMENT OF THE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL PROCESS DURING COVID–19 (THE CASE OF THE STUDENT PRAGMALINGUISTIC SURVEY) |
| title_full | DYNAMICS OF AMBIVALENT ASSESSMENT OF THE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL PROCESS DURING COVID–19 (THE CASE OF THE STUDENT PRAGMALINGUISTIC SURVEY) |
| title_fullStr | DYNAMICS OF AMBIVALENT ASSESSMENT OF THE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL PROCESS DURING COVID–19 (THE CASE OF THE STUDENT PRAGMALINGUISTIC SURVEY) |
| title_full_unstemmed | DYNAMICS OF AMBIVALENT ASSESSMENT OF THE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL PROCESS DURING COVID–19 (THE CASE OF THE STUDENT PRAGMALINGUISTIC SURVEY) |
| title_short | DYNAMICS OF AMBIVALENT ASSESSMENT OF THE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL PROCESS DURING COVID–19 (THE CASE OF THE STUDENT PRAGMALINGUISTIC SURVEY) |
| title_sort | dynamics of ambivalent assessment of the higher educational process during covid 19 the case of the student pragmalinguistic survey |
| topic | ambivalence ambivalent function and assessment covid–19 higher school |
| url | http://soc-journal.ru/jour/index.php/mssi/article/view/247 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT annavtaktarova dynamicsofambivalentassessmentofthehighereducationalprocessduringcovid19thecaseofthestudentpragmalinguisticsurvey AT marinancherkasova dynamicsofambivalentassessmentofthehighereducationalprocessduringcovid19thecaseofthestudentpragmalinguisticsurvey |