Temporary Employment, Permanent Stigma? Perceptions of Temporary Agency Workers Across Low- and High-Skilled Jobs

Research on temporary agency work emphasizes that temporary agency workers (TAWs), particularly those in low-skilled jobs associated with precariousness and low social prestige, are likely to be exposed to poor treatment, as well as stigmatization. On the contrary, stigmatization of TAWs in high-ski...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pia Cardone, Markus Tümpel, Christian M. Huber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lodz University Press 2021-07-01
Series:Qualitative Sociology Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/qualit/article/view/10380
_version_ 1819148121996787712
author Pia Cardone
Markus Tümpel
Christian M. Huber
author_facet Pia Cardone
Markus Tümpel
Christian M. Huber
author_sort Pia Cardone
collection DOAJ
description Research on temporary agency work emphasizes that temporary agency workers (TAWs), particularly those in low-skilled jobs associated with precariousness and low social prestige, are likely to be exposed to poor treatment, as well as stigmatization. On the contrary, stigmatization of TAWs in high-skilled jobs has not been treated in much detail in previous studies. Literature provides an incomplete picture of stigmatization within the broader field of temporary employment regarding the focus on low-skilled jobs. Hence, the present qualitative study is based on data from interviews of a heterogeneous sample of TAWs employed in low- and high-skilled jobs in Germany. By using and modifying Boyce and colleagues’ (2007) model of stigmatization, the study shows that stigmatizing treatment towards TAWs occurs across all skill levels, although the intensity and form of those experiences, as well as coping strategies, differ. Thereby, this study contributes to a more differentiated and skill level-specific understanding of how TAWs perceive and cope with stigmatization linked to their employment status. It also provides an important opportunity to advance Boyce and colleagues’ (2007) complex model of TAW stigmatization with empirical underpinnings.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T13:40:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b0ce21ef2ca49dba5c9178981a3f823
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1733-8077
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T13:40:41Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Lodz University Press
record_format Article
series Qualitative Sociology Review
spelling doaj.art-9b0ce21ef2ca49dba5c9178981a3f8232022-12-21T18:23:56ZengLodz University PressQualitative Sociology Review1733-80772021-07-0117363310.18778/1733-8077.17.3.0110279Temporary Employment, Permanent Stigma? Perceptions of Temporary Agency Workers Across Low- and High-Skilled JobsPia Cardone0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3724-280XMarkus Tümpel1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7233-5502Christian M. Huber2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1168-3495Chemnitz University of Technology, GermanyChemnitz University of Technology, GermanyChemnitz University of Technology, GermanyResearch on temporary agency work emphasizes that temporary agency workers (TAWs), particularly those in low-skilled jobs associated with precariousness and low social prestige, are likely to be exposed to poor treatment, as well as stigmatization. On the contrary, stigmatization of TAWs in high-skilled jobs has not been treated in much detail in previous studies. Literature provides an incomplete picture of stigmatization within the broader field of temporary employment regarding the focus on low-skilled jobs. Hence, the present qualitative study is based on data from interviews of a heterogeneous sample of TAWs employed in low- and high-skilled jobs in Germany. By using and modifying Boyce and colleagues’ (2007) model of stigmatization, the study shows that stigmatizing treatment towards TAWs occurs across all skill levels, although the intensity and form of those experiences, as well as coping strategies, differ. Thereby, this study contributes to a more differentiated and skill level-specific understanding of how TAWs perceive and cope with stigmatization linked to their employment status. It also provides an important opportunity to advance Boyce and colleagues’ (2007) complex model of TAW stigmatization with empirical underpinnings.https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/qualit/article/view/10380employment statusintergroup relationsskill-levelstigmatemporary agency workers
spellingShingle Pia Cardone
Markus Tümpel
Christian M. Huber
Temporary Employment, Permanent Stigma? Perceptions of Temporary Agency Workers Across Low- and High-Skilled Jobs
Qualitative Sociology Review
employment status
intergroup relations
skill-level
stigma
temporary agency workers
title Temporary Employment, Permanent Stigma? Perceptions of Temporary Agency Workers Across Low- and High-Skilled Jobs
title_full Temporary Employment, Permanent Stigma? Perceptions of Temporary Agency Workers Across Low- and High-Skilled Jobs
title_fullStr Temporary Employment, Permanent Stigma? Perceptions of Temporary Agency Workers Across Low- and High-Skilled Jobs
title_full_unstemmed Temporary Employment, Permanent Stigma? Perceptions of Temporary Agency Workers Across Low- and High-Skilled Jobs
title_short Temporary Employment, Permanent Stigma? Perceptions of Temporary Agency Workers Across Low- and High-Skilled Jobs
title_sort temporary employment permanent stigma perceptions of temporary agency workers across low and high skilled jobs
topic employment status
intergroup relations
skill-level
stigma
temporary agency workers
url https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/qualit/article/view/10380
work_keys_str_mv AT piacardone temporaryemploymentpermanentstigmaperceptionsoftemporaryagencyworkersacrosslowandhighskilledjobs
AT markustumpel temporaryemploymentpermanentstigmaperceptionsoftemporaryagencyworkersacrosslowandhighskilledjobs
AT christianmhuber temporaryemploymentpermanentstigmaperceptionsoftemporaryagencyworkersacrosslowandhighskilledjobs