Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic Shock

Background: Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices (tMCS) are increasingly being used in patients with infarct-associated cardiogenic shock (AMICS). Evidence on patient selection, complications and long-term outcomes is lacking. We aim to investigate differences in clinical characteristics...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jan-Sören Padberg, Jannik Feld, Leonie Padberg, Jeanette Köppe, Lena Makowski, Joachim Gerß, Patrik Dröge, Thomas Ruhnke, Christian Günster, Stefan Andreas Lange, Holger Reinecke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-02-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/4/1167
_version_ 1797297820265349120
author Jan-Sören Padberg
Jannik Feld
Leonie Padberg
Jeanette Köppe
Lena Makowski
Joachim Gerß
Patrik Dröge
Thomas Ruhnke
Christian Günster
Stefan Andreas Lange
Holger Reinecke
author_facet Jan-Sören Padberg
Jannik Feld
Leonie Padberg
Jeanette Köppe
Lena Makowski
Joachim Gerß
Patrik Dröge
Thomas Ruhnke
Christian Günster
Stefan Andreas Lange
Holger Reinecke
author_sort Jan-Sören Padberg
collection DOAJ
description Background: Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices (tMCS) are increasingly being used in patients with infarct-associated cardiogenic shock (AMICS). Evidence on patient selection, complications and long-term outcomes is lacking. We aim to investigate differences in clinical characteristics, complications and outcomes between patients receiving no tMCS or either intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) or Impella<sup>®</sup> for AMICS, with a particular focus on long-term outcomes. Methods: Using health claim data from AOK—Die Gesundheitskasse (local health care funds), we retrospectively analysed complications and outcomes of all insured patients with AMICS between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2017. Results: A total of 39,864 patients were included (IABP 5451; Impella 776; V-A ECMO 833; no tMCS 32,804). In-hospital complications, including renal failure requiring dialysis (50.3% V-A ECMO vs. 30.5% Impella vs. 29.2 IABP vs. 12.1% no tMCS), major bleeding (38.1% vs. 20.9% vs. 18.0% vs. 9.3%) and sepsis (22.5% vs. 15.9% vs. 13.9% vs. 9.3%) were more common in V-A ECMO patients. In a multivariate analysis, the use of both V-A ECMO (HR 1.57, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and Impella (HR 1.25, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were independently associated with long-term mortality, whereas use of IABP was not (HR 0.89, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier estimates showed better survival for patients on IABP compared with Impella, V-A ECMO and no-tMCS. Short- and long-term mortality was high across all groups. Conclusions: Our data show noticeably more in-hospital complications in patients on tMCS and higher mortality with V-A ECMO and Impella. The use of both devices is an independent risk factor for mortality, whereas the use of IABP is associated with a survival benefit.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:26:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b21b290bc0a48a7a9c4601d77f43211
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:26:51Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-9b21b290bc0a48a7a9c4601d77f432112024-02-23T15:22:29ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832024-02-01134116710.3390/jcm13041167Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic ShockJan-Sören Padberg0Jannik Feld1Leonie Padberg2Jeanette Köppe3Lena Makowski4Joachim Gerß5Patrik Dröge6Thomas Ruhnke7Christian Günster8Stefan Andreas Lange9Holger Reinecke10Department for Cardiology I: Coronary and Peripheral Vascular Disease, Heart Failure, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, D-48149 Münster, GermanyInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, GermanyDepartment for Cardiology I: Coronary and Peripheral Vascular Disease, Heart Failure, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, D-48149 Münster, GermanyInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, GermanyDepartment for Cardiology I: Coronary and Peripheral Vascular Disease, Heart Failure, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, D-48149 Münster, GermanyInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, GermanyAOK Research Institute (WIdO), AOK-Bundesverband, D-10178 Berlin, GermanyAOK Research Institute (WIdO), AOK-Bundesverband, D-10178 Berlin, GermanyAOK Research Institute (WIdO), AOK-Bundesverband, D-10178 Berlin, GermanyDepartment for Cardiology I: Coronary and Peripheral Vascular Disease, Heart Failure, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, D-48149 Münster, GermanyDepartment for Cardiology I: Coronary and Peripheral Vascular Disease, Heart Failure, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, D-48149 Münster, GermanyBackground: Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices (tMCS) are increasingly being used in patients with infarct-associated cardiogenic shock (AMICS). Evidence on patient selection, complications and long-term outcomes is lacking. We aim to investigate differences in clinical characteristics, complications and outcomes between patients receiving no tMCS or either intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) or Impella<sup>®</sup> for AMICS, with a particular focus on long-term outcomes. Methods: Using health claim data from AOK—Die Gesundheitskasse (local health care funds), we retrospectively analysed complications and outcomes of all insured patients with AMICS between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2017. Results: A total of 39,864 patients were included (IABP 5451; Impella 776; V-A ECMO 833; no tMCS 32,804). In-hospital complications, including renal failure requiring dialysis (50.3% V-A ECMO vs. 30.5% Impella vs. 29.2 IABP vs. 12.1% no tMCS), major bleeding (38.1% vs. 20.9% vs. 18.0% vs. 9.3%) and sepsis (22.5% vs. 15.9% vs. 13.9% vs. 9.3%) were more common in V-A ECMO patients. In a multivariate analysis, the use of both V-A ECMO (HR 1.57, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and Impella (HR 1.25, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were independently associated with long-term mortality, whereas use of IABP was not (HR 0.89, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier estimates showed better survival for patients on IABP compared with Impella, V-A ECMO and no-tMCS. Short- and long-term mortality was high across all groups. Conclusions: Our data show noticeably more in-hospital complications in patients on tMCS and higher mortality with V-A ECMO and Impella. The use of both devices is an independent risk factor for mortality, whereas the use of IABP is associated with a survival benefit.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/4/1167ImpellaV-A ECMOIABPcardiogenic shockacute myocardial infarctionmechanical circulatory support
spellingShingle Jan-Sören Padberg
Jannik Feld
Leonie Padberg
Jeanette Köppe
Lena Makowski
Joachim Gerß
Patrik Dröge
Thomas Ruhnke
Christian Günster
Stefan Andreas Lange
Holger Reinecke
Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic Shock
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Impella
V-A ECMO
IABP
cardiogenic shock
acute myocardial infarction
mechanical circulatory support
title Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic Shock
title_full Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic Shock
title_fullStr Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic Shock
title_full_unstemmed Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic Shock
title_short Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic Shock
title_sort complications and outcomes in 39 864 patients receiving standard care plus mechanical circulatory support or standard care alone for infarct associated cardiogenic shock
topic Impella
V-A ECMO
IABP
cardiogenic shock
acute myocardial infarction
mechanical circulatory support
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/4/1167
work_keys_str_mv AT jansorenpadberg complicationsandoutcomesin39864patientsreceivingstandardcareplusmechanicalcirculatorysupportorstandardcarealoneforinfarctassociatedcardiogenicshock
AT jannikfeld complicationsandoutcomesin39864patientsreceivingstandardcareplusmechanicalcirculatorysupportorstandardcarealoneforinfarctassociatedcardiogenicshock
AT leoniepadberg complicationsandoutcomesin39864patientsreceivingstandardcareplusmechanicalcirculatorysupportorstandardcarealoneforinfarctassociatedcardiogenicshock
AT jeanettekoppe complicationsandoutcomesin39864patientsreceivingstandardcareplusmechanicalcirculatorysupportorstandardcarealoneforinfarctassociatedcardiogenicshock
AT lenamakowski complicationsandoutcomesin39864patientsreceivingstandardcareplusmechanicalcirculatorysupportorstandardcarealoneforinfarctassociatedcardiogenicshock
AT joachimgerß complicationsandoutcomesin39864patientsreceivingstandardcareplusmechanicalcirculatorysupportorstandardcarealoneforinfarctassociatedcardiogenicshock
AT patrikdroge complicationsandoutcomesin39864patientsreceivingstandardcareplusmechanicalcirculatorysupportorstandardcarealoneforinfarctassociatedcardiogenicshock
AT thomasruhnke complicationsandoutcomesin39864patientsreceivingstandardcareplusmechanicalcirculatorysupportorstandardcarealoneforinfarctassociatedcardiogenicshock
AT christiangunster complicationsandoutcomesin39864patientsreceivingstandardcareplusmechanicalcirculatorysupportorstandardcarealoneforinfarctassociatedcardiogenicshock
AT stefanandreaslange complicationsandoutcomesin39864patientsreceivingstandardcareplusmechanicalcirculatorysupportorstandardcarealoneforinfarctassociatedcardiogenicshock
AT holgerreinecke complicationsandoutcomesin39864patientsreceivingstandardcareplusmechanicalcirculatorysupportorstandardcarealoneforinfarctassociatedcardiogenicshock