Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic Shock
Background: Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices (tMCS) are increasingly being used in patients with infarct-associated cardiogenic shock (AMICS). Evidence on patient selection, complications and long-term outcomes is lacking. We aim to investigate differences in clinical characteristics...
Main Authors: | Jan-Sören Padberg, Jannik Feld, Leonie Padberg, Jeanette Köppe, Lena Makowski, Joachim Gerß, Patrik Dröge, Thomas Ruhnke, Christian Günster, Stefan Andreas Lange, Holger Reinecke |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/4/1167 |
Similar Items
-
Cardiogenic shock - novelty and emerging therapeutic concepts
by: I. Petrov, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Cardiogenic shock — the current state of the problem
by: S. A. Boytsov, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
IABP versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
by: Beatrice De Lazzari, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Computational Evaluation of IABP, Impella 2.5, TandemHeart and Combined IABP and Impella 2.5 Support in Cardiogenic Shock
by: Rahmi Alkan, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
Survey on Cardiogenic Shock and the Use of ECMO and Impella in Spanish Cardiac Critical Care Units
by: Manuel Martínez-Sellés, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)