The Language of Comparisons: Communicating about Percentages

While comparisons between percentages or rates appear frequently in journalism and advertising, and are an essential component of quantitative writing, many students fail to understand precisely what percentages mean, and lack fluency with the language used for comparisons. After reviewing evidence...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jessica Polito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Numeracy Network 2014-01-01
Series:Numeracy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/numeracy/vol7/iss1/art6/
_version_ 1819211085811548160
author Jessica Polito
author_facet Jessica Polito
author_sort Jessica Polito
collection DOAJ
description While comparisons between percentages or rates appear frequently in journalism and advertising, and are an essential component of quantitative writing, many students fail to understand precisely what percentages mean, and lack fluency with the language used for comparisons. After reviewing evidence demonstrating this weakness, this experience-based perspective lays out a framework for teaching the language of comparisons in a structured way, and illustrates it with several authentic examples that exemplify mistaken or misleading uses of such numbers. The framework includes three common types of erroneous or misleading quantitative writing: the missing comparison, where a key number is omitted; the apples-to-pineapples comparison, where two subtly incomparable rates are presented; and the implied fallacy, where an invalid quantitative conclusion is left to the reader to infer.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T06:21:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b27ba5db98648febc9c3e5375f3f205
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1936-4660
1936-4660
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T06:21:28Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher National Numeracy Network
record_format Article
series Numeracy
spelling doaj.art-9b27ba5db98648febc9c3e5375f3f2052022-12-21T17:57:11ZengNational Numeracy NetworkNumeracy1936-46601936-46602014-01-01716http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.7.1.6The Language of Comparisons: Communicating about PercentagesJessica Polito0Wellesley CollegeWhile comparisons between percentages or rates appear frequently in journalism and advertising, and are an essential component of quantitative writing, many students fail to understand precisely what percentages mean, and lack fluency with the language used for comparisons. After reviewing evidence demonstrating this weakness, this experience-based perspective lays out a framework for teaching the language of comparisons in a structured way, and illustrates it with several authentic examples that exemplify mistaken or misleading uses of such numbers. The framework includes three common types of erroneous or misleading quantitative writing: the missing comparison, where a key number is omitted; the apples-to-pineapples comparison, where two subtly incomparable rates are presented; and the implied fallacy, where an invalid quantitative conclusion is left to the reader to infer.http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/numeracy/vol7/iss1/art6/ratespercentagesquantitative writingcomparisions
spellingShingle Jessica Polito
The Language of Comparisons: Communicating about Percentages
Numeracy
rates
percentages
quantitative writing
comparisions
title The Language of Comparisons: Communicating about Percentages
title_full The Language of Comparisons: Communicating about Percentages
title_fullStr The Language of Comparisons: Communicating about Percentages
title_full_unstemmed The Language of Comparisons: Communicating about Percentages
title_short The Language of Comparisons: Communicating about Percentages
title_sort language of comparisons communicating about percentages
topic rates
percentages
quantitative writing
comparisions
url http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/numeracy/vol7/iss1/art6/
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicapolito thelanguageofcomparisonscommunicatingaboutpercentages
AT jessicapolito languageofcomparisonscommunicatingaboutpercentages