POLARIZATION IN MEDIA POLITICAL DISCOURSE ON THE WAR IN UKRAINE: CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
The war unleashed by Russia in 2022 is widely presented in online versions of English-language newspapers; Ukraine is constantly in the epicentre of the world news. This study highlights political and ideological contexts of the war in Ukraine, the sociopolitical and cognitive aspects of news acco...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Alfred Nobel University Publisher
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://phil.duan.edu.ua/images/PDF/2022/2/18.pdf |
Summary: | The war unleashed by Russia in 2022 is widely presented in online versions of English-language
newspapers; Ukraine is constantly in the epicentre of the world news. This study highlights political and
ideological contexts of the war in Ukraine, the sociopolitical and cognitive aspects of news according
to an interdisciplinary approach considering the language as a social practice. The article highlights the
polarization in the presentation of the events and the main actors entitled in the discursive strategies,
representing the dichotomy In- versus Out-group. The study is aimed at the investigation of the ideological
structures and their manifesting linguistic devices in political discourse based on Critical Discourse Analysis
(CDA) of discursive strategies for constructing the images of Ukraine and Russia in the British and American
press. The integrated Critical Discourse Analysis was applied to the research of the news to study the media
discourse and the language, where CDA focuses on social practice, social power and ideology. Political
Discourse Analysis (PDA) is used to research the ideology of war images presented in the language of news
reports. The relevance of this study determined by the aim is to show the main discursive strategies of
polaeization in political media discourse. The research methods of the article combine three vectors of the
analysis by Fairclough with explanatory tools (by van Dijk), and the elements of stylistic analysis and Critical
Metaphor Analysis. The illustrative material was collected by information search and continuous sample
from the open access newspapers and magazines issued in the US and Great Britain (The Daily Mail, The
Financial Times, The Guardian, The Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post and others).
Conclusion. This research argues that polarisation is being demonstrated in the media discourse on
the war in Ukraine in 2022. The taxonomy of the identified discursive strategies of polarization deployed
in the media political discourse includes labelling, evidentiality, number game, hyperbolism, victimization,
personalization and analogy, that can either be used singly or intervened. The discursive strategy of
evidentiality is applied to authorities, officials, witnesses that are accepted as trustworthy sources of data;
the number game strategy combined with victimization are verbalized by metaphoric simile, metonymy,
enumerating and magnifying the numbers with the modifying adverbs; the strategy of hyperbole conveys
the positive impression of the in-group and negative acts magnification of the out-group verbalized by
metaphor, metonymy, metaphtonymy; the personalization strategy is deployed with the purpose of
foregrounding the positive actions of the in-group that implies negative out-group actions; the strategy
of analogy is applied in the comparison of the war in Ukraine and the struggle of the Ukrainians for their
independence with other historical events. Linguistic means used to realize the discursive strategies of
polarization include the conceptual metaphor, metonymy, simile, idioms, metaphtonymy, intertextual
allusion and personification. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2523-4463 2523-4749 |