Usefulness of a Colonoscopy Cap with an External Grid for the Measurement of Small-Sized Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Accurate measurement of polyp size during colonoscopy is crucial. The usefulness of cap-assisted colonoscopy and external grid application on monitor (gCAP) was evaluated for polyp size measurement in this 3-year, single-center, single-blind, randomized trial. Using the endoscopic forceps width as r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seul-Ki Han, Hyunil Kim, Jin-woo Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Su-Young Kim, Hong-Jun Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/11/2365
_version_ 1797532338048991232
author Seul-Ki Han
Hyunil Kim
Jin-woo Kim
Hyun-Soo Kim
Su-Young Kim
Hong-Jun Park
author_facet Seul-Ki Han
Hyunil Kim
Jin-woo Kim
Hyun-Soo Kim
Su-Young Kim
Hong-Jun Park
author_sort Seul-Ki Han
collection DOAJ
description Accurate measurement of polyp size during colonoscopy is crucial. The usefulness of cap-assisted colonoscopy and external grid application on monitor (gCAP) was evaluated for polyp size measurement in this 3-year, single-center, single-blind, randomized trial. Using the endoscopic forceps width as reference, the discrepancy percent (DP), error rate (ER), and measurement time were compared between gCAP and visual estimation (VE) after randomization. ER was calculated within a 20% and 33% limit. From the 111 patients, 280 polyps were measured. The mean polyp sizes were 4.0 ± 1.7 mm and 4.2 ± 1.8 mm with gCAP and VE, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.368). Compared with that by the forceps method, DP was significantly lower in the gCAP group than in the VE group. Moreover, ER was significantly lower in the gCAP group within its preset limit. The measurement time was 4 s longer in the gCAP group than in the VE group (8.2 ± 4.8 s vs. 4.2 ± 1.5 s; <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, the forceps method lasted 28 s longer than the others. On subgroup analysis by size, gCAP was more accurate for polyp size ≥ 5 mm. The gCAP method was more accurate for polyp size measurement than VE, especially for polyps ≥ 5 mm, and was more convenient than the forceps method.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T10:58:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b381560165d408e95f05aeedea2b73f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T10:58:44Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-9b381560165d408e95f05aeedea2b73f2023-11-21T21:43:16ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-05-011011236510.3390/jcm10112365Usefulness of a Colonoscopy Cap with an External Grid for the Measurement of Small-Sized Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized TrialSeul-Ki Han0Hyunil Kim1Jin-woo Kim2Hyun-Soo Kim3Su-Young Kim4Hong-Jun Park5Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju 24626, KoreaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju 24626, KoreaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju 24626, KoreaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju 24626, KoreaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju 24626, KoreaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju 24626, KoreaAccurate measurement of polyp size during colonoscopy is crucial. The usefulness of cap-assisted colonoscopy and external grid application on monitor (gCAP) was evaluated for polyp size measurement in this 3-year, single-center, single-blind, randomized trial. Using the endoscopic forceps width as reference, the discrepancy percent (DP), error rate (ER), and measurement time were compared between gCAP and visual estimation (VE) after randomization. ER was calculated within a 20% and 33% limit. From the 111 patients, 280 polyps were measured. The mean polyp sizes were 4.0 ± 1.7 mm and 4.2 ± 1.8 mm with gCAP and VE, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.368). Compared with that by the forceps method, DP was significantly lower in the gCAP group than in the VE group. Moreover, ER was significantly lower in the gCAP group within its preset limit. The measurement time was 4 s longer in the gCAP group than in the VE group (8.2 ± 4.8 s vs. 4.2 ± 1.5 s; <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, the forceps method lasted 28 s longer than the others. On subgroup analysis by size, gCAP was more accurate for polyp size ≥ 5 mm. The gCAP method was more accurate for polyp size measurement than VE, especially for polyps ≥ 5 mm, and was more convenient than the forceps method.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/11/2365colonic polypresectioncolorectal cancer
spellingShingle Seul-Ki Han
Hyunil Kim
Jin-woo Kim
Hyun-Soo Kim
Su-Young Kim
Hong-Jun Park
Usefulness of a Colonoscopy Cap with an External Grid for the Measurement of Small-Sized Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Journal of Clinical Medicine
colonic polyp
resection
colorectal cancer
title Usefulness of a Colonoscopy Cap with an External Grid for the Measurement of Small-Sized Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_full Usefulness of a Colonoscopy Cap with an External Grid for the Measurement of Small-Sized Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Usefulness of a Colonoscopy Cap with an External Grid for the Measurement of Small-Sized Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of a Colonoscopy Cap with an External Grid for the Measurement of Small-Sized Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_short Usefulness of a Colonoscopy Cap with an External Grid for the Measurement of Small-Sized Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_sort usefulness of a colonoscopy cap with an external grid for the measurement of small sized colorectal polyps a prospective randomized trial
topic colonic polyp
resection
colorectal cancer
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/11/2365
work_keys_str_mv AT seulkihan usefulnessofacolonoscopycapwithanexternalgridforthemeasurementofsmallsizedcolorectalpolypsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT hyunilkim usefulnessofacolonoscopycapwithanexternalgridforthemeasurementofsmallsizedcolorectalpolypsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT jinwookim usefulnessofacolonoscopycapwithanexternalgridforthemeasurementofsmallsizedcolorectalpolypsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT hyunsookim usefulnessofacolonoscopycapwithanexternalgridforthemeasurementofsmallsizedcolorectalpolypsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT suyoungkim usefulnessofacolonoscopycapwithanexternalgridforthemeasurementofsmallsizedcolorectalpolypsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT hongjunpark usefulnessofacolonoscopycapwithanexternalgridforthemeasurementofsmallsizedcolorectalpolypsaprospectiverandomizedtrial