Impact of Intersection Control on Battery Electric Vehicle Energy Consumption

Battery electric vehicle (BEV) sales have significantly increased in recent years. They have different energy consumption patterns compared to the fuel consumption patterns of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). This study quantified the impact of intersection control approaches—roundabout,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyoungho Ahn, Sangjun Park, Hesham A. Rakha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/12/3190
_version_ 1797564757497085952
author Kyoungho Ahn
Sangjun Park
Hesham A. Rakha
author_facet Kyoungho Ahn
Sangjun Park
Hesham A. Rakha
author_sort Kyoungho Ahn
collection DOAJ
description Battery electric vehicle (BEV) sales have significantly increased in recent years. They have different energy consumption patterns compared to the fuel consumption patterns of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). This study quantified the impact of intersection control approaches—roundabout, traffic signal, and two-way stop controls—on BEVs’ energy consumption. The paper systematically investigates BEVs’ energy consumption patterns compared to the fuel consumption of ICEVs. The results indicate that BEVs’ energy consumption patterns are significantly different than ICEVs’ patterns. For example, for BEVs approaching a high-speed intersection, the roundabout was found to be the most energy-efficient intersection control, while the two-way stop sign was the least efficient. In contrast, for ICEVs, the two-way stop sign was the most fuel-efficient control, while the roundabout was the least efficient. Findings also indicate that the energy saving of traffic signal coordination was less significant for BEVs compared to the fuel consumption of ICEVs since more regenerative energy is produced when partial or poorly coordinated signal plans are implemented. The study confirms that BEV regenerative energy is a major factor in energy efficiency, and that BEVs recover different amounts of energy in different urban driving environments. The study suggests that new transportation facilities and control strategies should be designed to enhance BEVs’ energy efficiency, particularly in zero emission zones.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T19:02:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b39ff39051b456c9a20173fe4a9c977
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T19:02:25Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-9b39ff39051b456c9a20173fe4a9c9772023-11-20T04:21:55ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-06-011312319010.3390/en13123190Impact of Intersection Control on Battery Electric Vehicle Energy ConsumptionKyoungho Ahn0Sangjun Park1Hesham A. Rakha2Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, 3500 Transportation Research Plaza, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USADepartment of Civil Engineering, Chosun University, 309 Pilmun-Daero, Dong-Gu, Gwangju 61452, KoreaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 3500 Transportation Research Plaza, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USABattery electric vehicle (BEV) sales have significantly increased in recent years. They have different energy consumption patterns compared to the fuel consumption patterns of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). This study quantified the impact of intersection control approaches—roundabout, traffic signal, and two-way stop controls—on BEVs’ energy consumption. The paper systematically investigates BEVs’ energy consumption patterns compared to the fuel consumption of ICEVs. The results indicate that BEVs’ energy consumption patterns are significantly different than ICEVs’ patterns. For example, for BEVs approaching a high-speed intersection, the roundabout was found to be the most energy-efficient intersection control, while the two-way stop sign was the least efficient. In contrast, for ICEVs, the two-way stop sign was the most fuel-efficient control, while the roundabout was the least efficient. Findings also indicate that the energy saving of traffic signal coordination was less significant for BEVs compared to the fuel consumption of ICEVs since more regenerative energy is produced when partial or poorly coordinated signal plans are implemented. The study confirms that BEV regenerative energy is a major factor in energy efficiency, and that BEVs recover different amounts of energy in different urban driving environments. The study suggests that new transportation facilities and control strategies should be designed to enhance BEVs’ energy efficiency, particularly in zero emission zones.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/12/3190battery electric vehiclessignalized intersectionstraffic signal control
spellingShingle Kyoungho Ahn
Sangjun Park
Hesham A. Rakha
Impact of Intersection Control on Battery Electric Vehicle Energy Consumption
Energies
battery electric vehicles
signalized intersections
traffic signal control
title Impact of Intersection Control on Battery Electric Vehicle Energy Consumption
title_full Impact of Intersection Control on Battery Electric Vehicle Energy Consumption
title_fullStr Impact of Intersection Control on Battery Electric Vehicle Energy Consumption
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Intersection Control on Battery Electric Vehicle Energy Consumption
title_short Impact of Intersection Control on Battery Electric Vehicle Energy Consumption
title_sort impact of intersection control on battery electric vehicle energy consumption
topic battery electric vehicles
signalized intersections
traffic signal control
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/12/3190
work_keys_str_mv AT kyounghoahn impactofintersectioncontrolonbatteryelectricvehicleenergyconsumption
AT sangjunpark impactofintersectioncontrolonbatteryelectricvehicleenergyconsumption
AT heshamarakha impactofintersectioncontrolonbatteryelectricvehicleenergyconsumption