New Chemical Dopant and Counterion Mechanism for Organic Electrochemical Transistors and Organic Mixed Ionic–Electronic Conductors

Abstract Organic mixed ionic–electronic conductors (OMIECs) have varied performance requirements across a diverse application space. Chemically doping the OMIEC can be a simple, low‐cost approach for adapting performance metrics. However, complex challenges, such as identifying new dopant materials...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vianna N. Le, Joel H. Bombile, Gehan S. Rupasinghe, Kyle N. Baustert, Ruipeng Li, Iuliana P. Maria, Maryam Shahi, Paula Alarcon Espejo, Iain McCulloch, Kenneth R. Graham, Chad Risko, Alexandra F. Paterson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-09-01
Series:Advanced Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202207694
_version_ 1797674003522912256
author Vianna N. Le
Joel H. Bombile
Gehan S. Rupasinghe
Kyle N. Baustert
Ruipeng Li
Iuliana P. Maria
Maryam Shahi
Paula Alarcon Espejo
Iain McCulloch
Kenneth R. Graham
Chad Risko
Alexandra F. Paterson
author_facet Vianna N. Le
Joel H. Bombile
Gehan S. Rupasinghe
Kyle N. Baustert
Ruipeng Li
Iuliana P. Maria
Maryam Shahi
Paula Alarcon Espejo
Iain McCulloch
Kenneth R. Graham
Chad Risko
Alexandra F. Paterson
author_sort Vianna N. Le
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Organic mixed ionic–electronic conductors (OMIECs) have varied performance requirements across a diverse application space. Chemically doping the OMIEC can be a simple, low‐cost approach for adapting performance metrics. However, complex challenges, such as identifying new dopant materials and elucidating design rules, inhibit its realization. Here, these challenges are approached by introducing a new n‐dopant, tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBA‐OH), and identifying a new design consideration underpinning its success. TBA‐OH behaves as both a chemical n‐dopant and morphology additive in donor acceptor co‐polymer naphthodithiophene diimide‐based polymer, which serves as an electron transporting material in organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs). The combined effects enhance OECT transconductance, charge carrier mobility, and volumetric capacitance, representative of the key metrics underpinning all OMIEC applications. Additionally, when the TBA+ counterion adopts an “edge‐on” location relative to the polymer backbone, Coulombic interaction between the counterion and polaron is reduced, and polaron delocalization increases. This is the first time such mechanisms are identified in doped‐OECTs and doped‐OMIECs. The work herein therefore takes the first steps toward developing the design guidelines needed to realize chemical doping as a generic strategy for tailoring performance metrics in OECTs and OMIECs.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T21:52:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b450cce69df44bb8afc1a16d19d350a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2198-3844
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T21:52:47Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advanced Science
spelling doaj.art-9b450cce69df44bb8afc1a16d19d350a2023-09-26T07:39:32ZengWileyAdvanced Science2198-38442023-09-011027n/an/a10.1002/advs.202207694New Chemical Dopant and Counterion Mechanism for Organic Electrochemical Transistors and Organic Mixed Ionic–Electronic ConductorsVianna N. Le0Joel H. Bombile1Gehan S. Rupasinghe2Kyle N. Baustert3Ruipeng Li4Iuliana P. Maria5Maryam Shahi6Paula Alarcon Espejo7Iain McCulloch8Kenneth R. Graham9Chad Risko10Alexandra F. Paterson11Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering Centre for Applied Energy Research University of Kentucky Lexington KY 40506 USADepartment of Chemistry and Centre for Applied Energy Research University of Kentucky Lexington KY 40506 USADepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering Centre for Applied Energy Research University of Kentucky Lexington KY 40506 USADepartment of Chemistry University of Kentucky Lexington KY 40506 USABrookhaven National Lab Upton NY 11973 USADepartment of Chemistry Chemistry Research Laboratory University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3TA UKDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering Centre for Applied Energy Research University of Kentucky Lexington KY 40506 USADepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering Centre for Applied Energy Research University of Kentucky Lexington KY 40506 USADepartment of Chemistry Chemistry Research Laboratory University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3TA UKDepartment of Chemistry University of Kentucky Lexington KY 40506 USADepartment of Chemistry and Centre for Applied Energy Research University of Kentucky Lexington KY 40506 USADepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering Centre for Applied Energy Research University of Kentucky Lexington KY 40506 USAAbstract Organic mixed ionic–electronic conductors (OMIECs) have varied performance requirements across a diverse application space. Chemically doping the OMIEC can be a simple, low‐cost approach for adapting performance metrics. However, complex challenges, such as identifying new dopant materials and elucidating design rules, inhibit its realization. Here, these challenges are approached by introducing a new n‐dopant, tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBA‐OH), and identifying a new design consideration underpinning its success. TBA‐OH behaves as both a chemical n‐dopant and morphology additive in donor acceptor co‐polymer naphthodithiophene diimide‐based polymer, which serves as an electron transporting material in organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs). The combined effects enhance OECT transconductance, charge carrier mobility, and volumetric capacitance, representative of the key metrics underpinning all OMIEC applications. Additionally, when the TBA+ counterion adopts an “edge‐on” location relative to the polymer backbone, Coulombic interaction between the counterion and polaron is reduced, and polaron delocalization increases. This is the first time such mechanisms are identified in doped‐OECTs and doped‐OMIECs. The work herein therefore takes the first steps toward developing the design guidelines needed to realize chemical doping as a generic strategy for tailoring performance metrics in OECTs and OMIECs.https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202207694chemical dopingelectron transportingmorphology additiveorganic bioelectronicsorganic electrochemical transistorsorganic electronics
spellingShingle Vianna N. Le
Joel H. Bombile
Gehan S. Rupasinghe
Kyle N. Baustert
Ruipeng Li
Iuliana P. Maria
Maryam Shahi
Paula Alarcon Espejo
Iain McCulloch
Kenneth R. Graham
Chad Risko
Alexandra F. Paterson
New Chemical Dopant and Counterion Mechanism for Organic Electrochemical Transistors and Organic Mixed Ionic–Electronic Conductors
Advanced Science
chemical doping
electron transporting
morphology additive
organic bioelectronics
organic electrochemical transistors
organic electronics
title New Chemical Dopant and Counterion Mechanism for Organic Electrochemical Transistors and Organic Mixed Ionic–Electronic Conductors
title_full New Chemical Dopant and Counterion Mechanism for Organic Electrochemical Transistors and Organic Mixed Ionic–Electronic Conductors
title_fullStr New Chemical Dopant and Counterion Mechanism for Organic Electrochemical Transistors and Organic Mixed Ionic–Electronic Conductors
title_full_unstemmed New Chemical Dopant and Counterion Mechanism for Organic Electrochemical Transistors and Organic Mixed Ionic–Electronic Conductors
title_short New Chemical Dopant and Counterion Mechanism for Organic Electrochemical Transistors and Organic Mixed Ionic–Electronic Conductors
title_sort new chemical dopant and counterion mechanism for organic electrochemical transistors and organic mixed ionic electronic conductors
topic chemical doping
electron transporting
morphology additive
organic bioelectronics
organic electrochemical transistors
organic electronics
url https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202207694
work_keys_str_mv AT viannanle newchemicaldopantandcounterionmechanismfororganicelectrochemicaltransistorsandorganicmixedionicelectronicconductors
AT joelhbombile newchemicaldopantandcounterionmechanismfororganicelectrochemicaltransistorsandorganicmixedionicelectronicconductors
AT gehansrupasinghe newchemicaldopantandcounterionmechanismfororganicelectrochemicaltransistorsandorganicmixedionicelectronicconductors
AT kylenbaustert newchemicaldopantandcounterionmechanismfororganicelectrochemicaltransistorsandorganicmixedionicelectronicconductors
AT ruipengli newchemicaldopantandcounterionmechanismfororganicelectrochemicaltransistorsandorganicmixedionicelectronicconductors
AT iulianapmaria newchemicaldopantandcounterionmechanismfororganicelectrochemicaltransistorsandorganicmixedionicelectronicconductors
AT maryamshahi newchemicaldopantandcounterionmechanismfororganicelectrochemicaltransistorsandorganicmixedionicelectronicconductors
AT paulaalarconespejo newchemicaldopantandcounterionmechanismfororganicelectrochemicaltransistorsandorganicmixedionicelectronicconductors
AT iainmcculloch newchemicaldopantandcounterionmechanismfororganicelectrochemicaltransistorsandorganicmixedionicelectronicconductors
AT kennethrgraham newchemicaldopantandcounterionmechanismfororganicelectrochemicaltransistorsandorganicmixedionicelectronicconductors
AT chadrisko newchemicaldopantandcounterionmechanismfororganicelectrochemicaltransistorsandorganicmixedionicelectronicconductors
AT alexandrafpaterson newchemicaldopantandcounterionmechanismfororganicelectrochemicaltransistorsandorganicmixedionicelectronicconductors