Professional judgement: a social practice perspective on a multiple mini-interview for specialty training selection
Abstract Background Interviewers’ judgements play a critical role in competency-based assessments for selection such as the multiple-mini-interview (MMI). Much of the published research focuses on the psychometrics of selection and the impact of rater subjectivity. Within the context of selecting fo...
Main Authors: | Chris Roberts, Annette Burgess, Karyn Mossman, Koshila Kumar |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2025-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06535-3 |
Similar Items
-
Multiple mini interview (MMI) for general practice training selection in Australia: interviewers’ motivation
by: Annette Burgess, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Change in postgraduate medical education – how much didactic shaping is possible at all? A document analysis of the guideline regulations on specialty training 1992-2018 with a focus on surgery
by: Prediger, Sarah, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Matching of advanced undergraduate medical students’ competence profiles with the required competence profiles of their specialty of choice for postgraduate training
by: Lea Jebram, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Defining competence profiles of different medical specialties with the requirement-tracking questionnaire – a pilot study to provide a framework for medial students’ choice of postgraduate training
by: Elena Zelesniack, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Exploring the educational journey: perspectives of ethnic minority GP-trainees in Dutch GP-specialty training - a qualitative interview study
by: N.M van Moppes, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01)