What are 'Think Tanks'? Revisiting the Dilemma of the Definition

'Think tanks' (TTs) are 'sui generis' organizations that have been proliferating, playing more and more the role of very relevant actors on the political scene in clashes over interests, preferences and ideas for the formation of public policies. The definition of 'think tan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Juliana Cristina Rosa Hauck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Brazilian Political Science Association 2017-08-01
Series:Brazilian Political Science Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000200401&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
_version_ 1818179632158998528
author Juliana Cristina Rosa Hauck
author_facet Juliana Cristina Rosa Hauck
author_sort Juliana Cristina Rosa Hauck
collection DOAJ
description 'Think tanks' (TTs) are 'sui generis' organizations that have been proliferating, playing more and more the role of very relevant actors on the political scene in clashes over interests, preferences and ideas for the formation of public policies. The definition of 'think tank', however, creates a conceptual gap that causes serious limitations on the development of this field of study. Excessive generality or inflexibility in the use of the concept raises questions about the validity of the category. Either way, the 'trade offs' of the conceptual choices have delineated a not very useful concept of think tank to both inter-contextual and inter-organizational comparability and to differentiate think thanks from overlapping organizations. The article revisits some of these dilemmas. To do so, the treatment in the specialized literature of the analytic category, highlighting both the insensitivity of the traditional North American matrix to different national contexts and its obsolescence to the changes in the context of TTs' action, including their own context of origin, is explained. In shedding light on promising conceptual contributions, the main contribution of the present article is the proposal of the radial structuring of the concept of think tanks as 'boundary spanners', as advanced by Medvetz, and of corresponding indicators to deal with the large variation in the substantive properties of the operationalization of the adopted concept. Thus, the aim is to reduce non-specificities in the analytic category and the dissent of its social significance, which demands less abstraction facing the exploratory state of the field of study.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T21:06:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b4bd4f9fc304e27937a14f35f580c87
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1981-3821
1981-3821
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T21:06:57Z
publishDate 2017-08-01
publisher Brazilian Political Science Association
record_format Article
series Brazilian Political Science Review
spelling doaj.art-9b4bd4f9fc304e27937a14f35f580c872022-12-22T00:50:50ZengBrazilian Political Science AssociationBrazilian Political Science Review1981-38211981-38212017-08-0111213010.1590/1981-3821201700020006 What are 'Think Tanks'? Revisiting the Dilemma of the DefinitionJuliana Cristina Rosa Hauck0Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais'Think tanks' (TTs) are 'sui generis' organizations that have been proliferating, playing more and more the role of very relevant actors on the political scene in clashes over interests, preferences and ideas for the formation of public policies. The definition of 'think tank', however, creates a conceptual gap that causes serious limitations on the development of this field of study. Excessive generality or inflexibility in the use of the concept raises questions about the validity of the category. Either way, the 'trade offs' of the conceptual choices have delineated a not very useful concept of think tank to both inter-contextual and inter-organizational comparability and to differentiate think thanks from overlapping organizations. The article revisits some of these dilemmas. To do so, the treatment in the specialized literature of the analytic category, highlighting both the insensitivity of the traditional North American matrix to different national contexts and its obsolescence to the changes in the context of TTs' action, including their own context of origin, is explained. In shedding light on promising conceptual contributions, the main contribution of the present article is the proposal of the radial structuring of the concept of think tanks as 'boundary spanners', as advanced by Medvetz, and of corresponding indicators to deal with the large variation in the substantive properties of the operationalization of the adopted concept. Thus, the aim is to reduce non-specificities in the analytic category and the dissent of its social significance, which demands less abstraction facing the exploratory state of the field of study.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000200401&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=enThink tanksconcept operationalizationradial conceptorganizationscategories of analysis
spellingShingle Juliana Cristina Rosa Hauck
What are 'Think Tanks'? Revisiting the Dilemma of the Definition
Brazilian Political Science Review
Think tanks
concept operationalization
radial concept
organizations
categories of analysis
title What are 'Think Tanks'? Revisiting the Dilemma of the Definition
title_full What are 'Think Tanks'? Revisiting the Dilemma of the Definition
title_fullStr What are 'Think Tanks'? Revisiting the Dilemma of the Definition
title_full_unstemmed What are 'Think Tanks'? Revisiting the Dilemma of the Definition
title_short What are 'Think Tanks'? Revisiting the Dilemma of the Definition
title_sort what are think tanks revisiting the dilemma of the definition
topic Think tanks
concept operationalization
radial concept
organizations
categories of analysis
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000200401&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT julianacristinarosahauck whatarethinktanksrevisitingthedilemmaofthedefinition