Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: A comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Public and private family planning providers face different incentive structures, which may affect overall quality and ultimately the acceptability of family planning for their intended clients. This analysis seeks to quantify differ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Agha Sohail, Do Mai, Hutchinson Paul L
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-08-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/203
_version_ 1818386148114825216
author Agha Sohail
Do Mai
Hutchinson Paul L
author_facet Agha Sohail
Do Mai
Hutchinson Paul L
author_sort Agha Sohail
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Public and private family planning providers face different incentive structures, which may affect overall quality and ultimately the acceptability of family planning for their intended clients. This analysis seeks to quantify differences in the quality of family planning (FP) services at public and private providers in three representative sub-Saharan African countries (Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana), to assess how these quality differentials impact upon FP clients' satisfaction, and to suggest how quality improvements can improve contraceptive continuation rates.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Indices of technical, structural and process measures of quality are constructed from Service Provision Assessments (SPAs) conducted in Tanzania (2006), Kenya (2004) and Ghana (2002) using direct observation of facility attributes and client-provider interactions. Marginal effects from multivariate regressions controlling for client characteristics and the multi-stage cluster sample design assess the relative importance of different measures of structural and process quality at public and private facilities on client satisfaction.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Private health facilities appear to be of higher (interpersonal) process quality than public facilities but not necessarily higher technical quality in the three countries, though these differentials are considerably larger at lower level facilities (clinics, health centers, dispensaries) than at hospitals. Family planning client satisfaction, however, appears considerably higher at private facilities - both hospitals and clinics - most likely attributable to both process and structural factors such as shorter waiting times and fewer stockouts of methods and supplies.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Because the public sector represents the major source of family planning services in developing countries, governments and Ministries of Health should continue to implement and to encourage incentives, perhaps performance-based, to improve quality at public sector health facilities, as well as to strengthen regulatory and monitoring structures to ensure quality at both public and private facilities. In the meantime, private providers appear to be fulfilling an important gap in the provision of FP services in these countries.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-14T03:49:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b4e77066e9d478ba0004d52c9ba6b0f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T03:49:26Z
publishDate 2011-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-9b4e77066e9d478ba0004d52c9ba6b0f2022-12-21T23:18:15ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632011-08-0111120310.1186/1472-6963-11-203Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: A comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and GhanaAgha SohailDo MaiHutchinson Paul L<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Public and private family planning providers face different incentive structures, which may affect overall quality and ultimately the acceptability of family planning for their intended clients. This analysis seeks to quantify differences in the quality of family planning (FP) services at public and private providers in three representative sub-Saharan African countries (Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana), to assess how these quality differentials impact upon FP clients' satisfaction, and to suggest how quality improvements can improve contraceptive continuation rates.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Indices of technical, structural and process measures of quality are constructed from Service Provision Assessments (SPAs) conducted in Tanzania (2006), Kenya (2004) and Ghana (2002) using direct observation of facility attributes and client-provider interactions. Marginal effects from multivariate regressions controlling for client characteristics and the multi-stage cluster sample design assess the relative importance of different measures of structural and process quality at public and private facilities on client satisfaction.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Private health facilities appear to be of higher (interpersonal) process quality than public facilities but not necessarily higher technical quality in the three countries, though these differentials are considerably larger at lower level facilities (clinics, health centers, dispensaries) than at hospitals. Family planning client satisfaction, however, appears considerably higher at private facilities - both hospitals and clinics - most likely attributable to both process and structural factors such as shorter waiting times and fewer stockouts of methods and supplies.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Because the public sector represents the major source of family planning services in developing countries, governments and Ministries of Health should continue to implement and to encourage incentives, perhaps performance-based, to improve quality at public sector health facilities, as well as to strengthen regulatory and monitoring structures to ensure quality at both public and private facilities. In the meantime, private providers appear to be fulfilling an important gap in the provision of FP services in these countries.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/203
spellingShingle Agha Sohail
Do Mai
Hutchinson Paul L
Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: A comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana
BMC Health Services Research
title Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: A comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana
title_full Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: A comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana
title_fullStr Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: A comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana
title_full_unstemmed Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: A comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana
title_short Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: A comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana
title_sort measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services a comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in tanzania kenya and ghana
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/203
work_keys_str_mv AT aghasohail measuringclientsatisfactionandthequalityoffamilyplanningservicesacomparativeanalysisofpublicandprivatehealthfacilitiesintanzaniakenyaandghana
AT domai measuringclientsatisfactionandthequalityoffamilyplanningservicesacomparativeanalysisofpublicandprivatehealthfacilitiesintanzaniakenyaandghana
AT hutchinsonpaull measuringclientsatisfactionandthequalityoffamilyplanningservicesacomparativeanalysisofpublicandprivatehealthfacilitiesintanzaniakenyaandghana