Role of surgery in T4N0-3M0 esophageal cancer

Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate an unsettled issue that whether T4 esophageal cancer could benefit from surgery. Methods Patients with T4N0-3M0 esophageal cancer from 2004 to 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in this study. Ka...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen Qi, Liwen Hu, Chi Zhang, Kang Wang, Bingmei Qiu, Jun Yi, Yi Shen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-11-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03239-8
_version_ 1797414950401998848
author Chen Qi
Liwen Hu
Chi Zhang
Kang Wang
Bingmei Qiu
Jun Yi
Yi Shen
author_facet Chen Qi
Liwen Hu
Chi Zhang
Kang Wang
Bingmei Qiu
Jun Yi
Yi Shen
author_sort Chen Qi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate an unsettled issue that whether T4 esophageal cancer could benefit from surgery. Methods Patients with T4N0-3M0 esophageal cancer from 2004 to 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in this study. Kaplan–Meier method, Cox proportional hazard regression, and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to compare overall survival (OS) between the surgery and no-surgery group. Results A total of 1822 patients were analyzed. The multivariable Cox regression showed the HR (95% CI) for surgery vs. no surgery was 0.492 (0.427–0.567) (P < 0.001) in T4N0-3M0 cohort, 0.471 (0.354–0.627) (P < 0.001) in T4aN0-3M0 cohort, and 0.480 (0.335–0.689) (P < 0.001) in T4bN0-3M0 cohort. The HR (95% CI) for neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery vs. no surgery and surgery without neoadjuvant therapy vs. no surgery were 0.548 (0.461–0.650) (P < 0.001) and 0.464 (0.375–0.574) (P < 0.001), respectively. No significant OS difference was observed between neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery and surgery without neoadjuvant therapy: 0.966 (0.686–1.360) (P = 0.843). Subgroup analyses and PSM-adjusted analyses showed consistent results. Conclusion Surgery might bring OS improvement for T4N0-3M0 esophageal cancer patients, no matter in T4a disease or in T4b disease. Surgery with and without neoadjuvant therapy might both achieve better OS than no surgery.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T05:41:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b52f1b69fb14609900e1e803fac49b3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-7819
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T05:41:21Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
spelling doaj.art-9b52f1b69fb14609900e1e803fac49b32023-12-03T12:24:58ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192023-11-0121111110.1186/s12957-023-03239-8Role of surgery in T4N0-3M0 esophageal cancerChen Qi0Liwen Hu1Chi Zhang2Kang Wang3Bingmei Qiu4Jun Yi5Yi Shen6Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing UniversityDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing UniversityDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing UniversityDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing UniversityDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing UniversityDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing UniversityDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing UniversityAbstract Background This study aimed to investigate an unsettled issue that whether T4 esophageal cancer could benefit from surgery. Methods Patients with T4N0-3M0 esophageal cancer from 2004 to 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in this study. Kaplan–Meier method, Cox proportional hazard regression, and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to compare overall survival (OS) between the surgery and no-surgery group. Results A total of 1822 patients were analyzed. The multivariable Cox regression showed the HR (95% CI) for surgery vs. no surgery was 0.492 (0.427–0.567) (P < 0.001) in T4N0-3M0 cohort, 0.471 (0.354–0.627) (P < 0.001) in T4aN0-3M0 cohort, and 0.480 (0.335–0.689) (P < 0.001) in T4bN0-3M0 cohort. The HR (95% CI) for neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery vs. no surgery and surgery without neoadjuvant therapy vs. no surgery were 0.548 (0.461–0.650) (P < 0.001) and 0.464 (0.375–0.574) (P < 0.001), respectively. No significant OS difference was observed between neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery and surgery without neoadjuvant therapy: 0.966 (0.686–1.360) (P = 0.843). Subgroup analyses and PSM-adjusted analyses showed consistent results. Conclusion Surgery might bring OS improvement for T4N0-3M0 esophageal cancer patients, no matter in T4a disease or in T4b disease. Surgery with and without neoadjuvant therapy might both achieve better OS than no surgery.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03239-8T4Esophageal cancerSurgeryPSMSEER
spellingShingle Chen Qi
Liwen Hu
Chi Zhang
Kang Wang
Bingmei Qiu
Jun Yi
Yi Shen
Role of surgery in T4N0-3M0 esophageal cancer
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
T4
Esophageal cancer
Surgery
PSM
SEER
title Role of surgery in T4N0-3M0 esophageal cancer
title_full Role of surgery in T4N0-3M0 esophageal cancer
title_fullStr Role of surgery in T4N0-3M0 esophageal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Role of surgery in T4N0-3M0 esophageal cancer
title_short Role of surgery in T4N0-3M0 esophageal cancer
title_sort role of surgery in t4n0 3m0 esophageal cancer
topic T4
Esophageal cancer
Surgery
PSM
SEER
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03239-8
work_keys_str_mv AT chenqi roleofsurgeryint4n03m0esophagealcancer
AT liwenhu roleofsurgeryint4n03m0esophagealcancer
AT chizhang roleofsurgeryint4n03m0esophagealcancer
AT kangwang roleofsurgeryint4n03m0esophagealcancer
AT bingmeiqiu roleofsurgeryint4n03m0esophagealcancer
AT junyi roleofsurgeryint4n03m0esophagealcancer
AT yishen roleofsurgeryint4n03m0esophagealcancer