Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries
Abstract Recent scientific evidence shows that genetic diversity must be maintained, managed, and monitored to protect biodiversity and nature's contributions to people. Three genetic diversity indicators, two of which do not require DNA‐based assessment, have been proposed for reporting to the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2023-05-01
|
Series: | Conservation Letters |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12953 |
_version_ | 1827914887644315648 |
---|---|
author | Sean Hoban Jessica M. da Silva Alicia Mastretta‐Yanes Catherine E. Grueber Myriam Heuertz Margaret E. Hunter Joachim Mergeay Ivan Paz‐Vinas Keiichi Fukaya Fumiko Ishihama Rebecca Jordan Viktoria Köppä María Camilla Latorre‐Cárdenas Anna J. MacDonald Victor Rincon‐Parra Per Sjögren‐Gulve Naoki Tani Henrik Thurfjell Linda Laikre |
author_facet | Sean Hoban Jessica M. da Silva Alicia Mastretta‐Yanes Catherine E. Grueber Myriam Heuertz Margaret E. Hunter Joachim Mergeay Ivan Paz‐Vinas Keiichi Fukaya Fumiko Ishihama Rebecca Jordan Viktoria Köppä María Camilla Latorre‐Cárdenas Anna J. MacDonald Victor Rincon‐Parra Per Sjögren‐Gulve Naoki Tani Henrik Thurfjell Linda Laikre |
author_sort | Sean Hoban |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Recent scientific evidence shows that genetic diversity must be maintained, managed, and monitored to protect biodiversity and nature's contributions to people. Three genetic diversity indicators, two of which do not require DNA‐based assessment, have been proposed for reporting to the Convention on Biological Diversity and other conservation and policy initiatives. These indicators allow an approximation of the status and trends of genetic diversity to inform policy, using existing demographic and geographic information. Application of these indicators has been initiated and here we describe ongoing efforts in calculating these indicators with examples. We specifically describe a project underway to apply these indicators in nine countries, provide example calculations, address concerns of policy makers and implementation challenges, and describe a roadmap for further development and deployment, incorporating feedback from the broader community. We also present guidance documents and data collection tools for calculating indicators. We demonstrate that Parties can successfully and cost‐effectively report these genetic diversity indicators with existing biodiversity observation data, and, in doing so, better conserve the Earth's biodiversity. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T02:50:40Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9b546b2af5824bca98c2711a69d6af76 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1755-263X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T02:50:40Z |
publishDate | 2023-05-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Conservation Letters |
spelling | doaj.art-9b546b2af5824bca98c2711a69d6af762023-06-28T12:22:09ZengWileyConservation Letters1755-263X2023-05-01163n/an/a10.1111/conl.12953Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countriesSean Hoban0Jessica M. da Silva1Alicia Mastretta‐Yanes2Catherine E. Grueber3Myriam Heuertz4Margaret E. Hunter5Joachim Mergeay6Ivan Paz‐Vinas7Keiichi Fukaya8Fumiko Ishihama9Rebecca Jordan10Viktoria Köppä11María Camilla Latorre‐Cárdenas12Anna J. MacDonald13Victor Rincon‐Parra14Per Sjögren‐Gulve15Naoki Tani16Henrik Thurfjell17Linda Laikre18The Morton Arboretum Center for Tree Science Lisle IllinoisFoundational Biodiversity Sciences Division South African National Biodiversity Institute Pretoria South AfricaComisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad Ciudad de Mexico MexicoFaculty of Science School of Life and Environmental Sciences The University of Sydney NSW AustraliaINRAE, University of Bordeaux Biogeco, Cestas FranceU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center Gainesville FloridaResearch Institute for Nature and Forest Geraardsbergen BelgiumDepartment of Biology Colorado State University Fort Collins ColoradoNational Institute for Environmental Studies Tsukuba Ibaraki JapanNational Institute for Environmental Studies Tsukuba Ibaraki JapanCSIRO Sandy Bay Tasmania AustraliaDivision of Population Genetics, Department of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenInstituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Morelia MéxicoAustralian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy the Environment and Water, Kingston Tasmania AustraliaInstituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Programa de evaluación y monitoreo Bogotá ColombiaNordic Chapter of the Society for Conservation Biology Uppsala SwedenForestry Division, Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences Tsukuba Ibaraki JapanSwedish Species Information Centre Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala SwedenDivision of Population Genetics, Department of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenAbstract Recent scientific evidence shows that genetic diversity must be maintained, managed, and monitored to protect biodiversity and nature's contributions to people. Three genetic diversity indicators, two of which do not require DNA‐based assessment, have been proposed for reporting to the Convention on Biological Diversity and other conservation and policy initiatives. These indicators allow an approximation of the status and trends of genetic diversity to inform policy, using existing demographic and geographic information. Application of these indicators has been initiated and here we describe ongoing efforts in calculating these indicators with examples. We specifically describe a project underway to apply these indicators in nine countries, provide example calculations, address concerns of policy makers and implementation challenges, and describe a roadmap for further development and deployment, incorporating feedback from the broader community. We also present guidance documents and data collection tools for calculating indicators. We demonstrate that Parties can successfully and cost‐effectively report these genetic diversity indicators with existing biodiversity observation data, and, in doing so, better conserve the Earth's biodiversity.https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12953adaptive capacityconservation geneticsindicatorsmonitoringpolicyresilience |
spellingShingle | Sean Hoban Jessica M. da Silva Alicia Mastretta‐Yanes Catherine E. Grueber Myriam Heuertz Margaret E. Hunter Joachim Mergeay Ivan Paz‐Vinas Keiichi Fukaya Fumiko Ishihama Rebecca Jordan Viktoria Köppä María Camilla Latorre‐Cárdenas Anna J. MacDonald Victor Rincon‐Parra Per Sjögren‐Gulve Naoki Tani Henrik Thurfjell Linda Laikre Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries Conservation Letters adaptive capacity conservation genetics indicators monitoring policy resilience |
title | Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries |
title_full | Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries |
title_fullStr | Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries |
title_short | Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries |
title_sort | monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the convention on biological diversity an ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries |
topic | adaptive capacity conservation genetics indicators monitoring policy resilience |
url | https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12953 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seanhoban monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT jessicamdasilva monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT aliciamastrettayanes monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT catherineegrueber monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT myriamheuertz monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT margaretehunter monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT joachimmergeay monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT ivanpazvinas monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT keiichifukaya monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT fumikoishihama monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT rebeccajordan monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT viktoriakoppa monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT mariacamillalatorrecardenas monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT annajmacdonald monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT victorrinconparra monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT persjogrengulve monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT naokitani monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT henrikthurfjell monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries AT lindalaikre monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries |