Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries

Abstract Recent scientific evidence shows that genetic diversity must be maintained, managed, and monitored to protect biodiversity and nature's contributions to people. Three genetic diversity indicators, two of which do not require DNA‐based assessment, have been proposed for reporting to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sean Hoban, Jessica M. da Silva, Alicia Mastretta‐Yanes, Catherine E. Grueber, Myriam Heuertz, Margaret E. Hunter, Joachim Mergeay, Ivan Paz‐Vinas, Keiichi Fukaya, Fumiko Ishihama, Rebecca Jordan, Viktoria Köppä, María Camilla Latorre‐Cárdenas, Anna J. MacDonald, Victor Rincon‐Parra, Per Sjögren‐Gulve, Naoki Tani, Henrik Thurfjell, Linda Laikre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-05-01
Series:Conservation Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12953
_version_ 1797793666650079232
author Sean Hoban
Jessica M. da Silva
Alicia Mastretta‐Yanes
Catherine E. Grueber
Myriam Heuertz
Margaret E. Hunter
Joachim Mergeay
Ivan Paz‐Vinas
Keiichi Fukaya
Fumiko Ishihama
Rebecca Jordan
Viktoria Köppä
María Camilla Latorre‐Cárdenas
Anna J. MacDonald
Victor Rincon‐Parra
Per Sjögren‐Gulve
Naoki Tani
Henrik Thurfjell
Linda Laikre
author_facet Sean Hoban
Jessica M. da Silva
Alicia Mastretta‐Yanes
Catherine E. Grueber
Myriam Heuertz
Margaret E. Hunter
Joachim Mergeay
Ivan Paz‐Vinas
Keiichi Fukaya
Fumiko Ishihama
Rebecca Jordan
Viktoria Köppä
María Camilla Latorre‐Cárdenas
Anna J. MacDonald
Victor Rincon‐Parra
Per Sjögren‐Gulve
Naoki Tani
Henrik Thurfjell
Linda Laikre
author_sort Sean Hoban
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Recent scientific evidence shows that genetic diversity must be maintained, managed, and monitored to protect biodiversity and nature's contributions to people. Three genetic diversity indicators, two of which do not require DNA‐based assessment, have been proposed for reporting to the Convention on Biological Diversity and other conservation and policy initiatives. These indicators allow an approximation of the status and trends of genetic diversity to inform policy, using existing demographic and geographic information. Application of these indicators has been initiated and here we describe ongoing efforts in calculating these indicators with examples. We specifically describe a project underway to apply these indicators in nine countries, provide example calculations, address concerns of policy makers and implementation challenges, and describe a roadmap for further development and deployment, incorporating feedback from the broader community. We also present guidance documents and data collection tools for calculating indicators. We demonstrate that Parties can successfully and cost‐effectively report these genetic diversity indicators with existing biodiversity observation data, and, in doing so, better conserve the Earth's biodiversity.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T02:50:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b546b2af5824bca98c2711a69d6af76
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1755-263X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T02:50:40Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Conservation Letters
spelling doaj.art-9b546b2af5824bca98c2711a69d6af762023-06-28T12:22:09ZengWileyConservation Letters1755-263X2023-05-01163n/an/a10.1111/conl.12953Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countriesSean Hoban0Jessica M. da Silva1Alicia Mastretta‐Yanes2Catherine E. Grueber3Myriam Heuertz4Margaret E. Hunter5Joachim Mergeay6Ivan Paz‐Vinas7Keiichi Fukaya8Fumiko Ishihama9Rebecca Jordan10Viktoria Köppä11María Camilla Latorre‐Cárdenas12Anna J. MacDonald13Victor Rincon‐Parra14Per Sjögren‐Gulve15Naoki Tani16Henrik Thurfjell17Linda Laikre18The Morton Arboretum Center for Tree Science Lisle IllinoisFoundational Biodiversity Sciences Division South African National Biodiversity Institute Pretoria South AfricaComisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad Ciudad de Mexico MexicoFaculty of Science School of Life and Environmental Sciences The University of Sydney NSW AustraliaINRAE, University of Bordeaux Biogeco, Cestas FranceU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center Gainesville FloridaResearch Institute for Nature and Forest Geraardsbergen BelgiumDepartment of Biology Colorado State University Fort Collins ColoradoNational Institute for Environmental Studies Tsukuba Ibaraki JapanNational Institute for Environmental Studies Tsukuba Ibaraki JapanCSIRO Sandy Bay Tasmania AustraliaDivision of Population Genetics, Department of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenInstituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Morelia MéxicoAustralian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy the Environment and Water, Kingston Tasmania AustraliaInstituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Programa de evaluación y monitoreo Bogotá ColombiaNordic Chapter of the Society for Conservation Biology Uppsala SwedenForestry Division, Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences Tsukuba Ibaraki JapanSwedish Species Information Centre Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala SwedenDivision of Population Genetics, Department of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenAbstract Recent scientific evidence shows that genetic diversity must be maintained, managed, and monitored to protect biodiversity and nature's contributions to people. Three genetic diversity indicators, two of which do not require DNA‐based assessment, have been proposed for reporting to the Convention on Biological Diversity and other conservation and policy initiatives. These indicators allow an approximation of the status and trends of genetic diversity to inform policy, using existing demographic and geographic information. Application of these indicators has been initiated and here we describe ongoing efforts in calculating these indicators with examples. We specifically describe a project underway to apply these indicators in nine countries, provide example calculations, address concerns of policy makers and implementation challenges, and describe a roadmap for further development and deployment, incorporating feedback from the broader community. We also present guidance documents and data collection tools for calculating indicators. We demonstrate that Parties can successfully and cost‐effectively report these genetic diversity indicators with existing biodiversity observation data, and, in doing so, better conserve the Earth's biodiversity.https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12953adaptive capacityconservation geneticsindicatorsmonitoringpolicyresilience
spellingShingle Sean Hoban
Jessica M. da Silva
Alicia Mastretta‐Yanes
Catherine E. Grueber
Myriam Heuertz
Margaret E. Hunter
Joachim Mergeay
Ivan Paz‐Vinas
Keiichi Fukaya
Fumiko Ishihama
Rebecca Jordan
Viktoria Köppä
María Camilla Latorre‐Cárdenas
Anna J. MacDonald
Victor Rincon‐Parra
Per Sjögren‐Gulve
Naoki Tani
Henrik Thurfjell
Linda Laikre
Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries
Conservation Letters
adaptive capacity
conservation genetics
indicators
monitoring
policy
resilience
title Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries
title_full Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries
title_fullStr Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries
title_short Monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the Convention on Biological Diversity: An ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries
title_sort monitoring status and trends in genetic diversity for the convention on biological diversity an ongoing assessment of genetic indicators in nine countries
topic adaptive capacity
conservation genetics
indicators
monitoring
policy
resilience
url https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12953
work_keys_str_mv AT seanhoban monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT jessicamdasilva monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT aliciamastrettayanes monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT catherineegrueber monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT myriamheuertz monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT margaretehunter monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT joachimmergeay monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT ivanpazvinas monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT keiichifukaya monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT fumikoishihama monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT rebeccajordan monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT viktoriakoppa monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT mariacamillalatorrecardenas monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT annajmacdonald monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT victorrinconparra monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT persjogrengulve monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT naokitani monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT henrikthurfjell monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries
AT lindalaikre monitoringstatusandtrendsingeneticdiversityfortheconventiononbiologicaldiversityanongoingassessmentofgeneticindicatorsinninecountries