Finding Common Ground towards Progressive Transformation in Student Residence Spaces: Residence Committee Members as Bricoleuric Brokers

This article stemmed from discussions related to residence committee members and their role as leaders within their communities. The ideas presented during these conversations gave rise to a research interest for a conceptual exploration of collaborative and progressive social transformative brokeri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neo Pat Maseko, Shawn Stützner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Journal of Student Affairs in Africa 2020-07-01
Series:Journal of Student Affairs in Africa
Online Access:https://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/jsaa/article/view/4183
_version_ 1819095277265485824
author Neo Pat Maseko
Shawn Stützner
author_facet Neo Pat Maseko
Shawn Stützner
author_sort Neo Pat Maseko
collection DOAJ
description This article stemmed from discussions related to residence committee members and their role as leaders within their communities. The ideas presented during these conversations gave rise to a research interest for a conceptual exploration of collaborative and progressive social transformative brokering within a complex context. In particular, the identified interest within this context relates to finding common ground, between, inter alia, student affairs management, and residence committee (RC) management in residence spaces. The specific focus is the RC leadership team as strategists who are positioned to deal with potential conflict resolution in policy interpretation and enactment. The argument presented here has to do with the extent to which they can do this in a manner that facilitates the collegial and amicable interpretation of policy in residence communities. Inherent within this is the notion of managing the potential disjuncture between policy formulation and policy implementation. The primary question about this concern finds expression in how RCs move from being part of active cultural residence spaces to critical participants in dialogic conversations as part of a multi-perspectival progressive transformation strategy. Indeed, while bringing about transformation, the dynamic issues of brokering cohesion within a context of ideological and political complexity remain. Given the inherent situational complexities, the article adopts a bricoleuric theoretical thread that requires a multiperspectival orientation. In this regard, appropriate components of critical complexity theory, critical system theories, transformative learning, and hope theory account for this theoretical approach. A further consideration is that of a positionality of finding progressive and transformative common ground. In this regard, the argument revolves around examining the systemic factors that bear relevance for actualising the envisaged intention, that is, common ground in the interests of the common good. At stake in this argument is the notion of RC identity and their role in building a values-based residence system of policy interpretation and enactment, while bridging the ideological divide and finding common ground between the expectations of student affairs management and the residence community.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T23:40:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b59dcc3933e416caa9c4aafd656d43d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2311-1771
2307-6267
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T23:40:45Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Journal of Student Affairs in Africa
record_format Article
series Journal of Student Affairs in Africa
spelling doaj.art-9b59dcc3933e416caa9c4aafd656d43d2022-12-21T18:46:14ZengJournal of Student Affairs in AfricaJournal of Student Affairs in Africa2311-17712307-62672020-07-018110.24085/jsaa.v8i1.41832753Finding Common Ground towards Progressive Transformation in Student Residence Spaces: Residence Committee Members as Bricoleuric BrokersNeo Pat Maseko0Shawn Stützner1Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of the Free State. She is currently a Research Associate at the Global Research Centre in GautengSenior Officer: Residence Head & Residence Dialogues Coordinator, University of the Free StateThis article stemmed from discussions related to residence committee members and their role as leaders within their communities. The ideas presented during these conversations gave rise to a research interest for a conceptual exploration of collaborative and progressive social transformative brokering within a complex context. In particular, the identified interest within this context relates to finding common ground, between, inter alia, student affairs management, and residence committee (RC) management in residence spaces. The specific focus is the RC leadership team as strategists who are positioned to deal with potential conflict resolution in policy interpretation and enactment. The argument presented here has to do with the extent to which they can do this in a manner that facilitates the collegial and amicable interpretation of policy in residence communities. Inherent within this is the notion of managing the potential disjuncture between policy formulation and policy implementation. The primary question about this concern finds expression in how RCs move from being part of active cultural residence spaces to critical participants in dialogic conversations as part of a multi-perspectival progressive transformation strategy. Indeed, while bringing about transformation, the dynamic issues of brokering cohesion within a context of ideological and political complexity remain. Given the inherent situational complexities, the article adopts a bricoleuric theoretical thread that requires a multiperspectival orientation. In this regard, appropriate components of critical complexity theory, critical system theories, transformative learning, and hope theory account for this theoretical approach. A further consideration is that of a positionality of finding progressive and transformative common ground. In this regard, the argument revolves around examining the systemic factors that bear relevance for actualising the envisaged intention, that is, common ground in the interests of the common good. At stake in this argument is the notion of RC identity and their role in building a values-based residence system of policy interpretation and enactment, while bridging the ideological divide and finding common ground between the expectations of student affairs management and the residence community.https://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/jsaa/article/view/4183
spellingShingle Neo Pat Maseko
Shawn Stützner
Finding Common Ground towards Progressive Transformation in Student Residence Spaces: Residence Committee Members as Bricoleuric Brokers
Journal of Student Affairs in Africa
title Finding Common Ground towards Progressive Transformation in Student Residence Spaces: Residence Committee Members as Bricoleuric Brokers
title_full Finding Common Ground towards Progressive Transformation in Student Residence Spaces: Residence Committee Members as Bricoleuric Brokers
title_fullStr Finding Common Ground towards Progressive Transformation in Student Residence Spaces: Residence Committee Members as Bricoleuric Brokers
title_full_unstemmed Finding Common Ground towards Progressive Transformation in Student Residence Spaces: Residence Committee Members as Bricoleuric Brokers
title_short Finding Common Ground towards Progressive Transformation in Student Residence Spaces: Residence Committee Members as Bricoleuric Brokers
title_sort finding common ground towards progressive transformation in student residence spaces residence committee members as bricoleuric brokers
url https://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/jsaa/article/view/4183
work_keys_str_mv AT neopatmaseko findingcommongroundtowardsprogressivetransformationinstudentresidencespacesresidencecommitteemembersasbricoleuricbrokers
AT shawnstutzner findingcommongroundtowardsprogressivetransformationinstudentresidencespacesresidencecommitteemembersasbricoleuricbrokers