Historically grounded spatial population projections for the continental United States

Large-scale spatial population projections are of growing importance to the global change community. Spatial settlement patterns are a key determinant of vulnerability to climate-related hazards as well as to land-use and its consequences for habitat, energy use, and emissions of greenhouse gases an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bryan Jones, Brian C O’Neill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2013-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044021
_version_ 1827870685330931712
author Bryan Jones
Brian C O’Neill
author_facet Bryan Jones
Brian C O’Neill
author_sort Bryan Jones
collection DOAJ
description Large-scale spatial population projections are of growing importance to the global change community. Spatial settlement patterns are a key determinant of vulnerability to climate-related hazards as well as to land-use and its consequences for habitat, energy use, and emissions of greenhouse gases and air pollutants. Few projections exist of spatial distribution at national or larger scales, and while recent efforts improve on earlier approaches that simply scaled or extrapolated existing spatial patterns, important methodological shortcomings remain and models have not been calibrated to nor validated against historical trends. Here we present spatially explicit 100-year projections for the continental United States consistent with two different scenarios of possible socio-economic development. The projections are based on a new model that is calibrated to observed changes in regional population distribution since 1950, corrects for distorting effects at borders, and employs a spatial mask for designating protected or uninhabitable land. Using new metrics for comparing spatial outcomes, we find that our projections anticipate more moderate trends in urban expansion and coastal settlement than widely used existing projections. We also find that differences in outcomes across models are much larger than differences across alternative socio-economic scenarios for a given model, emphasizing the importance of better understanding of methods of spatial population projection for improved integrated assessments of social and environmental change.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:59:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b5de960191d4fadb4130693237a0ade
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:59:47Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-9b5de960191d4fadb4130693237a0ade2023-08-09T14:40:33ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262013-01-018404402110.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044021Historically grounded spatial population projections for the continental United StatesBryan Jones0Brian C O’Neill1Climate and Global Dynamics Division, Integrated Science Program, National Center for Atmospheric Research , PO Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USAClimate and Global Dynamics Division, Integrated Science Program, National Center for Atmospheric Research , PO Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USALarge-scale spatial population projections are of growing importance to the global change community. Spatial settlement patterns are a key determinant of vulnerability to climate-related hazards as well as to land-use and its consequences for habitat, energy use, and emissions of greenhouse gases and air pollutants. Few projections exist of spatial distribution at national or larger scales, and while recent efforts improve on earlier approaches that simply scaled or extrapolated existing spatial patterns, important methodological shortcomings remain and models have not been calibrated to nor validated against historical trends. Here we present spatially explicit 100-year projections for the continental United States consistent with two different scenarios of possible socio-economic development. The projections are based on a new model that is calibrated to observed changes in regional population distribution since 1950, corrects for distorting effects at borders, and employs a spatial mask for designating protected or uninhabitable land. Using new metrics for comparing spatial outcomes, we find that our projections anticipate more moderate trends in urban expansion and coastal settlement than widely used existing projections. We also find that differences in outcomes across models are much larger than differences across alternative socio-economic scenarios for a given model, emphasizing the importance of better understanding of methods of spatial population projection for improved integrated assessments of social and environmental change.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044021spatial populationpopulation projectionsgravity modelUnited States
spellingShingle Bryan Jones
Brian C O’Neill
Historically grounded spatial population projections for the continental United States
Environmental Research Letters
spatial population
population projections
gravity model
United States
title Historically grounded spatial population projections for the continental United States
title_full Historically grounded spatial population projections for the continental United States
title_fullStr Historically grounded spatial population projections for the continental United States
title_full_unstemmed Historically grounded spatial population projections for the continental United States
title_short Historically grounded spatial population projections for the continental United States
title_sort historically grounded spatial population projections for the continental united states
topic spatial population
population projections
gravity model
United States
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044021
work_keys_str_mv AT bryanjones historicallygroundedspatialpopulationprojectionsforthecontinentalunitedstates
AT brianconeill historicallygroundedspatialpopulationprojectionsforthecontinentalunitedstates